Aghion, Edouard (2011): NAFTA and its Impact on Mexico. Forthcoming in: Scripta, Politica et Economica (April 2012)
Download (271kB) | Preview
The principal objective of a free trade agreement between two or more countries is to increase efficiency. As the well-known Heckscher-Ohlin (1933) theorem suggests, by going from autarky to free trade, the countries involved will tend to specialize in the production of those goods and services that each country has a comparative advantage in, and this will lead to increased efficiency and welfare. This paper analyzes how the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Canada and Mexico has created efficiency and welfare in Mexico, as it has been argued that NAFTA has been both advantageous as well as disadvantageous for Mexico. In sum, this paper investigates which particular sectors of Mexico’s economy benefitted from and were injured by NAFTA, while taking into account macroeconomic indicators such as GDP growth, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows, volume of trade, wage inequalities and education, as most studies have found the net economic effects of NAFTA on Mexico to be ambiguous.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||NAFTA and its Impact on Mexico|
|Keywords:||NAFTA; Mexico; growth; TFP; World Trade Organization|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade
|Depositing User:||Edouard Aghion|
|Date Deposited:||18. Feb 2012 14:09|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 18:49|
Aghion, P., and P. Howitt, (1992), “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica 60 pp. 323-351.
Aghion, P., and P. Howitt, (2009), “Economics of Growth”, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alesina, A., and R. Perotti, (1994), “Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment”, European Economic Review, 40, pp.1203-1222
Andreas, P., (1996), “The Political Economy of Narco-Corruption in Mexico”, in War on Politics: the Price of Denial, E. Bertram, M. Blachman, K. Sharp, P. Andreas, eds. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press
Aspe, P., (1993), Economic Transformation the Mexican Way, Cambridge: MA, MIT Press
Attanasio, O., C. Meghir, and A. Santiago, (2011), “Education Choices in Mexico: Using a Structural Model and a Randomized Experiment to evaluate Progresa”, typescript, London: University College London.
Bergoening, R., P. Kehoe, T. Kehoe and R. Soto, (2002), “A Decade Lost and Found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 5 pp. 166-205.
Caliendo, L., and F. Parro, (2009), “Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA”, typescript Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (2004), NAFTA’s Promise and Reality: Lessons from Mexico for the Hemisphere”, Washington D.C.
Cord, L., and Q. Wodon, (2001), “Do Mexico’s Agricultural Programs Alleviate Poverty? Evidence from the Ejido Sector”, Washington, D.C: The World Bank.
Cuevas, A., M. Messmacher, and A. Werner, (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico since the Approval of NAFTA”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.19, No. 3, pp.473-488, Washington, D.C: The World Bank.
Dell, M., (2011), “Trafficking Networks and the Mexican Drug War”, Econometrica, forthcoming. Esquivel, G., and A. Tornell, (1998), “The Political Economy of Mexico’s Entry Into NAFTA”, in T. Ito and A. Krueger eds. The Annual East Asian NBER Conference.
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, (2004), El Paso Branch, « Workers’ Remittances to Mexico » El Paso Business Frontier, Issue 1.
Fukao, K., and Okubo, T. and Stern, R., (2002), “An Econometric Analysis of Trade Diversion under NAFTA”, School of Public Policy, The University of Michigan, Discussion Paper No. 491, Ann Arbor, MI.
Garduño-Rivera, R., (2010), “Effect of NAFTA on Mexico’s Income Distribution in the presence of Migration”, Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association, Joint Annual Meeting, Denver: CO.
Gilbreth, C., and G. Otero, (2001), “Democratization in Mexico: The Zapatista Uprising and Civil Society”, Latin American Perspectives, Issue 119, Vol. 28, No. 4, July, pp. 7-29.
Gould, D., (1998), “Has NAFTA Changed North American Trade?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Economic Review, First Quarter, pp.12-23.
Grimwade, N., (1996), International Trade Policy: A Contemporary Analysis, Routledge, London: UK.
Grossman, G., and E., Helpman, (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hanson, G.,H., (2005), Globalization, Labor Income, and Poverty in Mexico, in A. Harrison (Ed. Globalization on Poverty, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kagan, J., (2004), “Workers’ Rights in the Mexican Maquiladora Sector: Collective Bargaining, Women’s Rights, and General Human Rights: Law, Norms, and Practice”, in D. Bacon, The Children of NAFTA: Labor Wars on the U.S./Mexico Border, San Francisco, CA: Univ. of California Press.
Kose, M. A., G.M. Meredith, and C.M. Towe, (2004) “How Has NAFTA Affected the Mexican Economy? Review and Evidence”, Washington, D.C: IMF Working Paper, WP/04/59.
Krueger, A.O., 1999, “Trade Creation and Trade Diversion under NAFTA,” NBER Working Paper No. 7429 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).
Krueger, A.O, 2000, “NAFTA’s Effects: A Preliminary Assessment,” The World Economy, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 761–775.
Krugman, P., and M. Obstfeld, and M. Melitz, (2011). International Economics: Theory & Policy. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Lopez-Cordova, J.E., 2002, “NAFTA and Mexico’s Manufacturing Productivity: An Empirical Investigation Using Micro-Level Data,” Working Paper of the Inter- American Development Bank.
Lustig, Nora. 2001. “Life is not Easy: Mexico’s Quest for Stability and Growth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15:85-106.
Markusen, J.R. and S. Zahniser. 1999. “Liberalization and incentives for labor migration: theory with applications to NAFTA.” In R. Faini, J. De Melo and K.F. Zimmermann, eds. Migration. The Controversies and the Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. McKenzie, David and Hillel Rapoport. 2004. “Network Effects and the Dynamics of Migration and Inequality: Theory and Evidence from Mexico.” SCID working paper 201. Stanford, CA, USA. Melchor del Rio, A., and S.Thorwarth, (2007), “Tomatoes or Tomato Pickers – Free Trade and Migration in the NAFTA Case”, Mexican Business Web, December 12, 2011
Migration Policy Institute, Migration Facts, “Variable Impacts: State-Level Analysis of the Slowdown in the Growth of Remittances to Mexico” September 2007
Millman, J., (2009), “Remittances to Mexico fall more than forecast”, in The Wall Street Journal Online.
Morales, I., (2011), “The Energy Factor in Mexico-US Relations”, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, University of Oxford: Rice University.
Nanto, D., (2009), “The Global Financial Crisis: Analysis and Policy Implications”, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress.
OECD Development Center, “Effects of Migration on Sending Countries: What Do We Know?”, Working Paper No. 250.
Perry G., D. Lederman, L. Serven, and W. Maloney, (2003), “Lessons from NAFTA for Latin America and the Carribean”, The World Bank.
Ribando Seelke, C., (2001), Mexico: Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service.
Romer, P., (1991), Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, Vol.98, pp.71-102.
Santiso, Javier. 2007. Latin America's Political Economy: Beyond Good Revolutionaries and Free-Marketeers. Cambridge: MIT Press
Tornell, A., F. Westermann, and L. Martinez, (2004) “NAFTA and Mexico’s Economic Performance”, CESifo Working Paper No. 1155.
Villareal, M.A, (2010) “NAFTA and the Mexican Economy”, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Washington, D.C.
The World Bank Statistics, Online Database.