Analyzing Washington state's welfare program design, workfirst

Axelsen, Dan and Snarr, Hal W. (2006): Analyzing Washington state's welfare program design, workfirst. Published in: Mountain Plains Journal of Business and Economics , Vol. 5, (2006)

Abstract

Much debate in the early nineties centered on whether the federal entitlement program Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) reduced welfare dependency. Many contend that AFDC discouraged work, increased welfare dependency, and undermined the institution of family. Partly in response to these criticisms, welfare was reformed through the Personal Responsibility and Work Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in 1996. PRWORA modified the primary objectives of welfare by placing more emphasis on work experience accumulation and less on human capital accumulation. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) was designed to meet this primary objective. Washington State’s TANF program, WorkFirst, utilizes a progressive system of programs (components) aimed at reducing welfare dependency through labor force participation. WorkFirst components have a variety of objectives including skills training, temporary subsidized employment, and mentoring. WorkFirst’s objective is to accumulate work experience of welfare recipients, thus making them more employable. More work experience should place upward pressure on wage rates, which then in turn reduces welfare dependency. We analyze the working decision as it is related to Washington State’s program design using a binary choice probit model. We find that welfare recipients who are enrolled in the later stage components of WorkFirst are more likely to find work and exit welfare than those that have only completed the initial components designed under WorkFirst. Cumulatively, WorkFirst seems to be an effective welfare program design.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: TANF; welfare reform; employment
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

References

Bartik, T. and R. Eberts (1999) “Examining the Effect of Industry Trends and Structure on Welfare Caseloads,” Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, Edited by S. Danziger, Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI, pp. 119-57.

Blank, R. M. (2000) “What Causes Public Assistance Caseloads to Grow?” Journal of Human Resources 36: 85-118.

Bloom, D. and C. Michalopoulos (2001) “How Welfare and Work Policies Affect Employment and Income: A Synthesis of Research,” New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

Fein, D., D. Long, J. Behrens, and W. Lee (2001) “The ABC Evaluation: Turning the Corner: Delaware’s A Better Chance Welfare Reform Program at Four Years,” Cambridge: Abt Associates.

Figlio, D. and J. Ziliak (1999) “Welfare Reform, the Business cycle, and the Deline in AFDC Caseloads,” Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, Edited by S. Danziger, Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI, pp. 17-48.

Friedlander, D. and G. Hamilton (1996) “The Impact of a Continuous Participation Obligation in a Welfare Employment Program.” The Journal of Human Resources 31(4): 734-756.

Friedlander, D., D. H. Greenberg, and P. K. Robins (1997) “Evaluating Government Training Programs for the Economically Disadvantaged.” Journal of Economic Literature 35(4): 1809-1855.

Greene, W. (2000) Econometric Analysis, Fourth Edition. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Harris, K. (1993) “Work and Welfare Among Single Mothers in Poverty,” American Journal of Sociology 99, pp. 317-352.

Harris, K. (1996) “Life After Welfare: Women, Work, and Repeat Dependency,” American Sociological Review 61, pp. 407-426.

Hoynes, H. (2000) “Local Labor Markets and Welfare Spells: Do Demand Conditions Matter?” Review of Economics and Statistics 82, pp. 351-368.

Learch, S., J. Mayfield, and M. Burley (1999) "WorkFirst Job Search Services: Preliminary Analysis," Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Publication #9-06-3301.

Nakosteen and Zimmer (1980) “Migration and Income: The Question of Self-Selection,” Southern Economic Journal 46, pp. 840-51.

O’Neill, J. and M.A. Hill (2001) “Gaining Ground? Measuring the Impact of Welfare Reform on Welfare and Work,” NY: Manhattan Institute.

Wallace, G. and R. Blank (1999) “What Goes Up Must Come Down,” Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, Edited by S. Danziger, Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI, pp. 49-89.

Ziliak, J., D. Figlio, E. Davis, and L. Connelly (2000) “Accounting for the Decline in AFDC Caseloads: Welfare Reform or Economic Growth?” Journal of Human Resources 35 (Summer): 570-586.