Ética y Justicia. Reflexiones a partir de The Idea of Justice de Amartya Sen

Mejía Cubillos, Javier (2012): Ética y Justicia. Reflexiones a partir de The Idea of Justice de Amartya Sen.

Abstract

This paper carries out a brief analysis of Amartya Sen’s thinking on Justice, based on Part IV of his book The Idea of Justice. Besides of describing Sen’s thoughts on the subject, the paper aims to contextualize it in the evolution of Sen’s work and in the general discussion on Justice in economic theory, reconsidering his identity as a non utilitarian philosopher and reevaluating its importance in the history of economic thought. This work is important because it contributes to a better understanding of the most recent ideas of one of the most influential thinkers in moral discussion. The theory of Justice proposed by Sen has clear pragmatic features and does not pretend to determine an ideal set of conditions under which one can speak of absolute justice. In his theory, Justice does not require the existence of particular institutions, the subsistence of identical preferences among the members of society or the development of specific behaviors. The argumentative axis of his theory is the concept of public reasoning, whereby society would have to determine what Justice is about. Thus, Sen analyzes the main elements that would affect public reasoning in a society, including Democracy, as the ideal system for social dialogue, and Liberty, as a key factor of human welfare.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Commentary on: Eprints 0 not found.
• English Title: Ethics and justice. Reflections on The Idea of ​​Justice by Amartya Sen
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Amartya Sen; Ethics; Justice; Utilitarianism; Consequentialism
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology

References

Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.

Alvey, J.E. 2005. Overcoming positivism in economics: Amartya sen’s project of infusing Ethics into economics. Department of applied and international economics Discussion paper No. 05.03.

Arrow, K.J. 1950. A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58, p. 328.

Arrow, K.; Bolin, B.; Costanza, R.; Dasgupta, P.; Folke, C. ; Holling, C.S. ; Jansson, B.; Levin, S.; Maler, K.G.; Perrings, C. & Pimente, D. 1995. Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. SCIENCE, 268, 28.

Azqueta, D. & Delacámara, G. 2006. Ethics, economics and environmental management. Ecological Economics, 56, 4, pp. 524–533.

Berlin, I. 1958. Two Concepts of Liberty. En Isaiah Berlin (1969), Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.

Brandts, J. 2007. La economía experimental y la economía del comportamiento. Filosofía y Economía: Una Mirada Metodológica. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, 30, pp. 73-89.

Brighouse, H. & Robeyns, I. (Ed.). 2010. Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Cejudo, R. 2010. Deontología y consecuencialismo: un enfoque Informacional. CRÍTICA, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 42, 126, pp. 3–24.

Chaves, J.A. 2002. Ética y Economía. La perspectiva de Amartya Sen. Estudios filosóficos, 51, 146, pp. 5-37.

Cummiskey, D. 1990. Kantian Consequentialism. Ethics, 100, 3, pp. 586-615.

Eriksson, R. 2005. On the ethics of environmental economics as seen from textbooks. Ecological Economics, 52, 4, pp. 421-435.

Faravelli, M. 2007. How context matters: A survey based experiment on distributive justice. Journal of Public Economics, 91, pp. 1399–1422.

Fine, B. 2004. Economics and Ethics: Amartya Sen as point of departure. New School Economic Review, 1, 1, pp. 95-103.

Frey, B.S. 1992. Pricing and regulating affect environmental ethics. Environmental & Resource Economics, 2, 4, pp. 399-414.

Friedman, M. 1953. The methodology of positive economics. En M. Friedman, Essays in positive economics. Chicago, EEUU: University of Chicago Press.

Güth, W. & Kliemt, H. 2010. What ethics can learn from experimental economics - If anything. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 3, pp. 302-310.

Holler, M.J. & Leroch, M. 2010. Efficiency and justice revisited. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, pp. 311–319.

Huntington, S. 1996. The West : Unique, Not Universal. Foreign Affairs, 75, 6, pp. 28-46.

Johansson-Stenman, O. 1998. The Importance of Ethics in Environmental Economics with a Focus on Existence Values. Environmental and Resource Economics,11, 3, pp. 429-442.

Khan, H.A. 2008. Friedman's Methodology: A Puzzle and A Proposal for Generating Useful Debates through Causal Comparisons (with a postscript on positive vs. normative theories). MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Lopera, M.T. & Cuervo, F. 1997. John Suart Mill, John Rawls y Amartya Sen, los tres nombres de la equidad. Lecturas de Economía, 46, pp. 95-126.

Lucht, M. 2007. Does Kant Have Anything to Teach Us About Environmental Ethics? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66, 1, pp. 127-149.

Mäki, U. (Ed.). 2009. The methodology of positive economics: reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Meade, J. E. 1976. The just economy. Londres, Reino Unido: Allen and Unwin.

Morgan, S. 2009. Can There Be a Kantian Consequentialism?, Ratio, 22, pp. 19-40.

Muñoz, A.E. La utilidad como satisfacción de sí. Ecos de Economía, 26, pp. 129-168.

Norman, W.J. La filosofía política anglosajona antes y después de Rawls. Taula. Palma de Mayorca, 17-18.

Peterson, Martin. 2003. From Consequentialism to Utilitarianism. The Journal of Philosophy, 100, 8, pp. 403-415.

Piera, A. 2010. Amartya Sen, La idea de la Justicia, taurus, Madrid, 2007. 448 páginas. Foro Interno, 10, pp. 199-257.

Parfit, D. 2011. On What Matters. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.

Pedrajas, M. 2006. La transformación ética de la racionalidad económica en Amartya Sen. Una recuperación de Adam Smith. Quaderns de filosofia i ciència, 36, pp. 105-117.

Polk, J. 1989. From Locke to Hume. The Radicalization of theSensualistic Premisses in the Empirical Interpretation of the Origins of Speech. En J. Gessinger & W. Von Rahden (Eds.) Theorien vom Ursprung der Sprache. 2 vols. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Ripstein, A. 2006. Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls. Virginia Law Review, 92, 7.

Sen, A. 1970. The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78, pp. 152–157.

Sen, A. 1977. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6, 4, pp. 317-344.

Sen, A. 1979. Informational Analysis of Moral Principles. En R. Harrison (Ed.), Rational Action. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. 1985. Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, pp. 169-221.

Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford, Reino Unido: Blackwell Publishing.

Sen, A. 1990. Justice: Means versus Freedoms. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19, 2, pp. 111-121.

Sen, A. 1997. From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality. Southern Economic Journal, 64, 2, pp. 383-401.

Sen. A. 1999. Democracy as Universal Value. Journal of Democracy, 10, 3, pp. 3-17.

Sen, A. 2003. Democracy and its global roots. Why democracy is not the same as Westernization. The New Republic. October 6.

Sen, A. 2004. What’s the Point of Press Freedom? World Association of Newspapers, Mayo 3.

Sen, A. 2009a. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, EEUU: Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. 2009b. The Idea of Justice. Conferencia presentada en The London School of Economics and Polítical Science, Londres, Reino Unido.

Srinivasan, S. 2007. No Democracy without Justice: Political Freedom in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach. Journal of Human Development, 8, 3, pp. 457-480.

Stigler, G.J. 1980. Economics or Ethics? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values presentada en Harvard University, abril 24, 25 y 28.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 1998. Press release: The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1998. 14 de Octubre.

Valencia, G.D. & Cuervo, J.F. 1999. Critica a las bases éticas de la teoría neoclásica en la propuesta del bienestar social de Amartya Sen. Lecturas de Economía, 51, pp. 111-148.

Vizard, P. 2005. The contributions of Professor Amartya Sen in the field of human rights. CASEpaper, 91.

Williams, G. 2009. Kant's Account of Reason. En Edward N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.