Adaman, Fikret and Gökşen, Fatoş and Zenginobuz, Unal (2003): Political economy of citizens’ participation in environmental improvement: The case of Istanbul. Published in: Integrating and Articulating Environments: A Challenge for Northern and Southern Europe, , Vol. Volume, No. Integrated Assessment Series (2003): pp. 73-90.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_375.pdf Download (210kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We aim at questioning, within a political economy framework, the institutional context of environmental policies for the case of Turkey in general and of Istanbul in particular. The paper is centred around a survey study conducted with citizens of Istanbul (n=1565), a metropolitan city whose population is around 9 millions, with regard to their attitudes and behaviours on environmental issues, together with a set of in-depth interviews (n=16) carried out with representatives of business, NGOs, trade unions, and bureaucrats. The point of departure of the paper is the claim that environmental policies are likely to alter, overtly or covertly, the income distribution of societies, and ipso facto those who will be worse off in the ex-post sense will have a clear incentive to influence public authorities and politicians (be they central or local units) in not implementing them—their success depending of course on the extent to which the governing body is not sterile but open to corruption (the so-called “government failures”). The implication of the existence of such government failures on the enforceability of regulations dealing with environmental issues is certainly an area to which attention has recently been given, both at theoretical and empirical levels, where the issue of institutional context has emerged as one if not the important issue in addressing such failures. Turkey, being one of the clear examples of the existence of such corruptive elements, should certainly offer rich inputs to the said discussion, and the paper makes an attempt to questioning the institutional aspect of environmental policies from the point of view of citizens of Istanbul and of different stakeholders.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Political economy of citizens’ participation in environmental improvement: The case of Istanbul |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | political economy; environment; citizen participation; Istanbul |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 375 |
Depositing User: | Unal Zenginobuz |
Date Deposited: | 10 Oct 2006 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 17:52 |
References: | Adaman, Fikret (1997). The political economy of the environment in Turkey. New Perspectives in Turkey, Fall 17, 129-150. Adaman, Fikret and Ali Çarkoğlu (2000). Türkiye’de Yerel ve Merkezi Yönetimlerde Hizmetlerden Tatmin, Patronaj İlişkileri ve Reform. TESEV, Istanbul. Adaman, Fikret, Ali Çarkoğlu and Burhan Şenatalar (2001). Hanehalkı Gözünden Türkiye’de Yolsuzluğun Nedenleri ve Önlenmesine İlişkin Öneriler, Tesev, Istanbul. Adaman, Fikret, Sina Mandalinci and Yahya Madra (2002). The prospects of co-determination: The textile industry in Turkey. in F. Adaman and P. Devine (eds), Reciprocity, Redistribution and Exchange Revisited, Blackrose, Montreal. Arcury, T.A. (1990). Environmental attitudes and environmental knowledge. Human Organization, 44, 300-304. Belge, Taciser and Orhan Bilgit (eds) (1997). Yurttaş Katılımı: Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları ve Yerel Yönetimler Arasında Ortaklık ve İşbirliği. Burfaş, Bursa. Boyce, James K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11, 169-178. Brechin, Steven R. and Willett Kempton (1994). Global environmentalism: A challenge to the postmaterialism thesis, Social Science Quarterly, 51, 121-137. Carson, Richard T., Robert C. Mitchell, W. Michael Hanemann, Raymond J. Kopp, Stanley Presser, and Paul A. Ruud (1992). A contingent valuation study of lost passive use values resulting from the exxon valdez oil spill. A report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska (November 19, 1992). DPT (Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı) (2001), Gelir Dağılımının İyileştirilmesi ve Yoksullukla Mücadele (Improving the Income Distribution and Poverty Eradication), Ankara. Dunlap, Riley E., George H. Gallup and Alec M. Gallup (1993). Of global concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Survey. Environment, 35, 33-39. Duraiappah, Anantha K. (1998). Poverty and environmental degradation: A review and analysis of the nexus. World Development, 26(12), 2169-2179. Esmer, Yılmaz (1999). Devrim, Evrim, Statüko: Türkiye’de Sosyal, Siyasal, Ekonomik Değerler. TESEV, Istanbul. Gökşen, Fatoş, Fikret Adaman and E. Ünal Zenginobuz (2002). On environmental concern, willingness to pay, and postmaterialist values: Evidence from Istanbul. Environment and Behavior. Inglehart, Ronald (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Inglehart, Ronald (1990). Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Inglehart, Ronald (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science and Politics, 28, 57-72. Keleş, Ruhşen and C. Hamamcı (1993). Çevrebilim. İmge, Ankara. Krueger, O. Anne (1994). Economists’ changing perceptions of government. Weltwirtschaftliche Archive, 127, 417-431. Lemos, Maria C. (1998). The politics of pollution control in Brazil: State actors and social movements cleaning up Cubatão. World Development, 26(1), 75-87. Michener, Victoria J. (1998). The participatory approach: Contradiction and Co-option in Burkina Faso. World Development, 26(12), 2105-2118. North, Douglass (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Olson, Mancur (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Pearce, David W. and Kerry R. Turner (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Türkiye Çevre Vakfı (1999). Türkiyenin Çevre Sorunları. Ankara, Türkiye Çevre Vakfı. UNDP: Insani Gelişme Raporu (1998). Ankara, UNDP. Yaşamış, Firuz D. (1999). Turkish Environmental Law: an overview of legal principles. Mimeo. Zenginobuz, E. Ünal, Fikret Adaman and Fatoş Gökşen (2000). Local vs. national vs. global environmental goods: Does it make any difference in terms of willingness to pay?—Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Istanbul. Mimeo. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/375 |