Badran, M.F. (2007): What determines broadband uptake in emerging countries? An empirical study. Published in:
Download (243kB) | Preview
Before recent technological developments in telecom the use of available fixed line was limited to voice telecommunication only. At present the high frequencies on the subscriber line were used for high speed internet access. This Internet access technology is generally referred to as broadband. A popular example is the ADSL, the Asymmetric Digital Subscriber line for broadband Internet access. Econometric studies performed to evaluate the uptake of broadband have focused on developed economies like USA and OECD countries. However, emerging economies are playing an increasing role in the global economy. These countries are neither developed or least developed countries. They are a heterogeneous group of countries that have certain characteristics in common. Out of 22 emerging economies used in the sample for this study, 15 economies are among the top 75 countries for broadband penetration per 100 inhabitants.1 Recognizing the importance to transform their economies, these countries have adopted policies to transform their economies from traditional to knowledge based economies. Broadband uptake was recognized by economists and policy makers as the main vehicle to achieve knowledge based economy. The purpose of this paper is to determine the factors or indicators that impact broadband penetration in emerging countries, and to provide policy recommendations to increase broadband uptake in these economies.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||What determines broadband uptake in emerging countries? An empirical study.|
|Keywords:||Emerging economies, broadband penetration, panel data, fixed effects, random effects|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L96 - Telecommunications
L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services ; Computer Software
|Depositing User:||Mona Badran|
|Date Deposited:||07. Apr 2012 18:53|
|Last Modified:||09. Sep 2015 12:32|
Aron, Debra J. and David E. Burnstein, 2003 “ Broadband adoption in the United States an empirical study”, SSRN .
2. Austan Goolsbee, 2002”Subsidies, the value of broadband and the importance of fixed costs”, 2002, Broadband Should We Regulate High-Speed Internet Access? Edited by Robert W. Crandall James H. Alleman, AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies,Washington, D.C.
3. Bauer, J.M., Gai, P., Kim, J., Muth, T.A., Wildman, S.S., 2003. Broadband uptake in OECD countries. Paper presented at the 31st Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, Arlington, VA, USA
4. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M. and Yang, S(2002) "Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics (1): 137-199
5. Fernando A. Broner Guido Lorenzoni Sergio L. Schmukler, 2007, “Why do emerging economies borrow short term?”, World Bank paper WPS 3389
6. George S. Ford, Lawrence J. Spiwak(September 2004), The positive effects of unbundling on broadband deployment, Phoenix Center for Public Studies
7. Gillett, S., and Lehr, W. (1999) “Availability of Broadband Internet Access: Empirical Evidence,” paper presented at 27th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, VA.
8. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. 5th ed.Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall
9. ITU, “Core ICT Indicators, Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development”, 2005
10. ITU, “E-strategies, empowering development”, 2006
11. ITU, “E-strategies, empowering development”, 2006
12. ITU, “Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2006”
13. ITU, Internet Report, Digital life, 2006
14. Kedzie, C. (1997), "Communication and Democracy: Coincident Revolutions and the Emergent Dictator's Dilemma", RGSD-127, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica CA.
15. Kenneth Flamm , Anindya Chaudhuri, 2005, “AN ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINANTS OF BROADBAND ACCESS”, presented at the Telecommunications Policy - Research Conference Washington, DC, September 24, 2005
16. Lichtenberg, F. and Lehr, W. (1998), “Computer Use and Productivity Growth in Federal Government Agencies, 1987-92,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), pp. 257-279.
17. Maria Michalis (2001), Local competition and the role of regulation: The EU debate and Britain’s experience, Telecommunications Policy 25 (2001) 759–776
18. Scott Wallsten “Broadband and Unbundling Regulations in OECD Countries” , Working Paper 06-16, June 2006, AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C.
19. Scott Wallsten, June 2005 “Broadband penetration, an empirical analysis of state
& federal policies,” ,Working Paper 05-12, June 2005, AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.
20. Scott Wallsten, June 2005 “Broadband penetration, an empirical analysis of state & federal policies,” ,Working Paper 05-12, June 2005, AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies
21. UNCTAD report, “THE DIGITAL DIVIDE REPORT: ICT DIFFUSION INDEX 2005” United Nations New York and Geneva, 2006
22. Walter Distaso, Paolo Lupi , Fabio M. Manenti( 2006) Platform Competition and broadband uptake: Theory and Empirical evidence from the European Union., Information Economics and Policy 18 (2006) 87–106.
23. William H. Lehr, Carlos A. Osorio, Sharon E. Gillett, Marvin A. Sirbu “ Measuring broadband’s economic impact” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineering Systems Division, Working Paper Series ESD-WP-2006-02
24. Wooldridge, 2002, “ Woolridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross- Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, 25. World Economic Forum , Agusto Lopez –Claros and Klaus Schwab (2005) The Arab World Competitiveness Report 2005.