Using Sustainable Livelihoods Framework for assessing the impact of Extension programmes: An empirical study in the context of Joint Forest Management

Goswami, Rupak and Paul, Malay (2011): Using Sustainable Livelihoods Framework for assessing the impact of Extension programmes: An empirical study in the context of Joint Forest Management.

Abstract

As a profession, Extension has been prompted to embrace a broadened mandate that goes beyond transferring technologies and triggering agricultural development. International organisations have started to shift from ‘agricultural’ to ‘rural’ focus in their programmes and it is inevitable that extension’s success in future will not be judged in terms of technology transfer or (even) agricultural development alone. As a consequence, the scope of evaluating extension programmes will have to broaden itself for justifying the government expenditure and to enliven its prospect as a profession. Sustainable Livelihoods (SL) Framework provides excellent scope to capture the multifaceted impact of development programmes on clients’ livelihoods in terms of increase in their asset base and decrease in vulnerabilities. The present article describes development of a tool to assess the impact of Joint Forest Management (JFM) intervention in selected villages of the Ayodhya Hills of Purulia district, West Bengal and also shows the results of its field testing. The development of the tool followed a simple indicator-based multi-stakeholder approach taking SL framework as a reference. Conceptualisation of ‘impact pathway’ with continuous incorporation of stakeholder views helped to develop this tool. This was followed by the development of a ‘perception analysis tool’, using recall data, to assess the impact of JFM intervention on the respondents. The field testing of the tool successfully captured the impact of JFM on peoples’ assets and vulnerabilities. It could also discriminate successful Forest Protection Committee from the less successful one. This type of indicator-based multi-stakeholder approach may be applied for the future ‘extension plus’ programmes, which will contribute towards the sustainable livelihoods of its clients rather than disseminating technologies and/or technical information only.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Broad-based Extension, Impact Assessment, Impact Pathway, Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, Perception Analysis Tool, Joint Forest Management
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q23 - Forestry

References

A. Agrawal, and E. Ostrom (2001). “Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal”, Politics and Society 29 (4): 485-514.

G. Alex, G. W. Zijp and D. Byerlee (2002). “Rural extension and advisory services-new directions”, Rural Strategy Background Paper No 9, The World Bank, Washington DC.

P. Anandajayasekeram, R. Puskur, S. Workneh and D. Hoekstra (2008). Concepts and practices in agricultural extension in developing countries: A source book. IFPRI, Washington, DC, USA and ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya.

J. R. Anderson and R. W. Herdt (1990). “Reflections on impact assessment”, in Methods for diagnosing research system constraints and assessing the impact of agricultural research, Volume II, R. G. Echeverria, Ed, Volume II. The Hague, the Netherlands: ISNAR (International Service for National Agricultural Research), pp. 35–42.

V. K. Bahuguna and A. Upadhyay (2004). “Monitoring needs for JFM: the perspective of policy makers”, in Root to Canopy: Regenerating Forests through Community-State Partnerships, V. K. Bahuguna, K. Mitra, D. Capistrano and S. Saigal, Eds., New Delhi: Winrock International India/Commonwealth Forestry Association-India, pp. 309-316.

B. Belcher (2005). Monitoring Livelihood Impacts of Community Forest Management: Definitions, Criteria and Indicators. Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research, pp. 16.

B. Belcher, Ru´ız-P´erez, M. and R. Achdiawan. (2005). “Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: implications for livelihoods and conservation”, World Development, 33:1435–1452.

R. Bond, P. H. Kapondamgaga and R. P. S. Yadav (2003). “Monitoring the livelihood platform: Reflections on the operation of LAST”. A Paper Presented at the Conference on New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: Methods and Practice University of Manchester, 24 – 25 November 2003.

D. W. Bromley (1992). Making the Commons Work. San Francisco, CA: ICS, pp. 339.

R. Chambers (1994). “Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience”, World Development, 22 (9): 1253-1268.

I. Christoplos, J. Farrington and A. Kidd (2001). Extension, poverty and vulnerability: Inception report of a study for the Neuchâtel Initiative. Working paper 144. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.

DFID. (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. UK: DFID.

B. Douthwaite, T. Kuby, E. van de Fliert and S. Schulz (2003). “Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems”, Agricultural Systems, 78(2): 243-265.

J. Farrington, Christoplos, I., A. D. Kidd and M. Beckman (2002). “Extension, Poverty and Vulnerability: The Scope for Policy Reform-Final Report of a study for the Neuchatel Initiative”, Working Paper 155, Overseas Development Institute, UK.

C. J. Glendenning, Babu, S. and Asenso-Okyere, K. (2010). “Review of agricultural extension in India: are farmers’ information needs being met?” IFPRI Discussion Paper 01048. Addis Ababa: IFPRI.

I. Hill and D. Shields (1997). “Incentives for joint forest management in India: analytical methods and case studies”, World Bank Technical Paper no 394. Washington, DC., USA: World Bank, pp. 111.

B. M. McCay and J. M. Acheson (1987). The Question of the Commons, Arizona, USA: University of Arizona.

K. S. Murali, R. J. Rao and N. H. Ravindranath (2002). “Evaluation studies of Joint Forest Management in India: a review of analytical processes”, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 1(2): 184-199.

I. K. Murthy, K. S. Murali, G. T. Hegde, P. R. Bhat and N. H. Ravindranath (2002). “A comparative analysis of regeneration in natural forests and joint forest management plantations in Uttara Kannada district, Western Ghats”, Current Science, 83: 1358-1364.

P. Nayak, P. (2006). “Politics of co-optation: self-organized community forest management and joint forest management in Orissa, India”’ Unpublished MSc Thesis, Canada: Natural Resource Institute, University of Mannitoba.

Neuchatel Group (2002). “Common Framework on Financing Agricultural and Rural Extension”, Lindau : Neuchatel Group, Swiss Centre for Agricultural Extension and Rural Development,.

E. Ostrom (1990). Governing the Commons. UK: Cambridge University Press.

D. N. Pandey (1996). Beyond Vanishing Woods: Participatory Survival Options for Wildlife, Forests and People, Udaipur, India: Himanshu Publications.

D. N. Pandey (2005). “Poverty impact assessment of joint forest management in Jharkhand India”. Paper presented in the Rural Week hosted by PROFOR and ESSD Forests Team: Session on Forest Livelihoods and Vulnerability. Washington, D.C., March 31, 2005.

Pandey, N. (2005). “Monitoring the impact of joint forest management on rural livelihoods: a report of the study conducted during the summer internship of Aravali Institute of Management, Jodhpur with Winrock International-India, New Delhi.

N. H. Ravindranath and P. Sudha, P. (eds.) (2004). Joint forest management in India: spread, performance and impact. Hyderabad: University Press.

W. M. Rivera, M. K. Quamar, and L. V. Crowder (2001). “Agricultural and rural extension worldwide: options for institutional reform in the developing countries. extension, education and communication service, research, extension and training division, sustainable development department. Rome: FAO.

RKMLSP. (2008). Gramseva: The Annual Report of RKMLSP. Narendrapur: Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama.

M. Sarin (1995). “Joint Forest Management: achievements and unaddressed challenges”, Unasylva, 46 (1).

N. C. Saxena (1997). “The saga of participatory forest management in India”, CIFOR Special Publication, Indonesia.

R. V. Sulaiman and A. J. Hall (2002). An innovation system perspective on the restructuring of agricultural extension- evidence from India, Outlook on Agriculture 30(4);235-243.

N. Sundar, R. Jeffery and N. Thin. (2001). Branching out: Joint forest management in India.New Delhi: Oxford University Press.