Perceptions of entrepreneurs among polish students

Starnawska, Marzena (2010): Perceptions of entrepreneurs among polish students. Published in: Working Papers of Gdansk University of Technology No. VII (2010): pp. 95-117.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present how we can approach and explore the field of entrepreneurship phenomenon in an alternative way. We do this by employing constructivist philosophical position than is gaining more acceptance in business and management research. We hope to outline how we can approach topic of entrepreneurship using alternative, not mainstream method, This is done with the use of visual data gathered among Gdansk University of Technology among students who were asked to present their constructions of an entrepreneur. The data presented here is part of a wider research project, focused on semiotics of symbols present in the pictorial representations of entrepreneurs. When an individual is being described as ‘entrepreneurial’ or ‘enterprising’ this is usually taken as a compliment. Nevertheless, these words have different meanings for different people. One of the first academics who encompassed the negative notions of being enterprising in the field of entrepreneurship was Baumol (1990) who analyzed perceptions of entrepreneurs from historical perspective. He has distinguished three types of entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. The alternative understandings and meanings of entrepreneurship have recently emerged in the field of entrepreneurship, especially the ones situated in the interpretative paradigm. They have been explained and explored under the theme of ‘entrepreneurship beyond the boundaries’ .

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: transition economies; Poland; entrepreneurship; entrepreneur
• Subjects: Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L26 - Entrepreneurship; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M13 - New Firms ; Startups

References

1. Antonoupoulos G.A. and Mitra J. (2009) ‘ The Hidden Enterprise of Bootlegging Cigarretes out of Greece’, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship , 22(1), 1-8

2. Anderson, A.R. (2000), ‘Paradox in the Periphery: an Entrepreneurial Reconception’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1), 91-110.

3. Anderson, A.R. and Starnawska, M., (2008), ‘Research practices in entrepreneurship; problems of definition, description and meaning’ , International Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(4).

4. Bacławski K., Korczega M. and Zbierowski P. (2005), ‘Studium przedsiębiorczości w Polsce w roku 2004’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Fundacja Edukacyjna Bachalski, Poznań

5. Ball M. And Smith G. (1992) Analysing Visual Data, Sage Publications

6. Banks, M. (2007) Using Visual Methods in Qualitative Research, Sage Publications

7. Baumol, W.J. (1990) ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’ Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893-921

8. Bell, P. (2001) ‘Content analysis of Visual Images’ in: Handbook of Visual Analysis, T. Van Leeuwen, C. Jewitt (eds.), Sage Publications, pp. 10-34

9. Berger A.A. (2004) Media Analysis Techniques, Sage Publications

10. Berger, P. and Luckman, T. (1983) Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa, (Polish edition)

11. Burns, P. (2007) Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

12. Chell, E., Pittaway, L. (1998), ‘The social constructionism of entrepreneurship’, paper presented at ISBA Conference, Durham, November.

13. Cierniak-Szóstak E. (2006) Wizerunek polskiego przedsiębiorcy jako element legitymizacji/delegitymizacji nowego ładu, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego 8(1), Rzeszów.

14. Davidsson, P. (2003), ‘The Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: Some Suggestions’, in: Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol 6, JAI Press, pp 2-90.

15. Drakopoulou-Dodd, S. and Anderson, A.R., (2007), ‘Mumpsimus and the mything of the individualistic entrepreneur’, International Journal of Small Business, 25(4), 341-360.

16. Eriksson P. and Kovalainen A. (2008) Qualitative Methods in Business Research, Sage Publications,

17. Fletcher, D. E. (2006) ‘Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity’ Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(5), 421-440.

18. Gell A., (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, Oxford, Claredon

19. Glinka, B. (2008) Kulturowe uwarunkowania przedsiębiorczości w Polsce, PWE, Warszawa.

20. Heath C. and Hindmarsch J. (2002) ‘Analysing interaction: video, ethnography and situated conduct’ in Qualitative research in action, T. May (ed.), London, Sage Publications.

21. Lindgren M. and Packendorff J., (2009), ‘Social constructionism and entrepreneurship. Basic assumptions and consequences for theory and research’ International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 15(1), 25-47

22. Martz W.B. Jr, Neil T.C. and Biscaccianti A. (2003) ‘Student perception of entrepreneurs: a cultural perspective’ International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 7, 67-86

23. Opinie o bogactwie i ludziach bogatych. Komunikat z badań., Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, Warszawa, czerwiec 2007. http://www.cbos.pl/PL/publikacje/raporty_2007.php accessed on 12 May 2010.

24. Prestiż zawodów. Komunikat z badań. Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, Warszawa , styczeń 2009, Warszawa. www.cbos.pl/SPISKM.POL/2009/K_008_09.PDF accessed on 12 May 2010

25. Silverman, D. (2007) Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, Sage Publications

26. Smith, R., (2006) Entrepreneur as socially constructed, Unpublished PhD Thesis, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, the UK.

27. Smith R., (2008) ‘Have you heard the one about the entrepreneur? Curiosity and entrepreneur jokes’ mimeo

28. Smith R. and Anderson A.R. (year) ‘Recognizing meaning: semiotics in entrepreneurial research’ in Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship Research, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 169-192

29. Starnawska, M. (2009), ‘The way things are done here – Polish entrepreneurship – having endowed heritage or burden?’ in: What do we know /and would like to know/ about entrepreneurship in Poland, J.E. Wasilczuk (ed.), GUT, Gdańsk.

30. Stiles, D. R. (2004) ‘ Pictorial representation’ in: Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Cassel C. and Symon G. (eds.). Sage Publications

31. Świadomość ekonomiczna społeczeństwa i wizerunek biznesu, Kolarska-Bobińska L. (ed.), ISPWarszawa 2004

32. Wade G., Smith R. and Anderson A.R. (2003) ‘Becoming, Being and Belonging Entrepreneurial Establishment: Alternative views of the social construction of entrepreneurship’ Manchester Metropolitan University Business School Working paper Series (online), http://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/e-space/handle/2173/1792 accessed 12 March 2010