Koundouri, Phoebe (2004): Econometrics Informing Natural Resources Management:Selected Empirical Analyses. Published in: (2004)
Download (79kB) | Preview
The increasing scarcity of natural resources (in terms of quantity and quality) is one of the most pervasive allocation issues facing development planners throughout the world. The need for sustainable management of these valuable resources has become a critical policy concern. Econometrics is a tool that can inform and facilitate such a management. However, it is only recently that natural resource management has attracted the attention and interest of a critical mass of applied econometricians.This volume outlines the fundamental principles and difficulties that characterize the challenging task of using econometrics to inform natural resource management policies and illustrates them through a number of case-studies from all over the world. The book aims to be a comprehensive sketch of the boarder picture of the state-of-the-art in the area of Econometrics applied to Environmental and Natural Resource Management. The selection of contributions and referee process, opted for a wide range of econometric techniques that can be used to inform natural resource management, while keeping a balance between methods and applications. Applications concern atmospheric carbon reduction, water resource management, wildlife, crop and aquatic biodiversity conservation, fisheries management, as well as broader issues on the relationship between growth, sustainability and the environment. The case studies have been carefully chosen to be of major concern in the arena of environmental policy, mainly in Europe (both EU member states and assessing countries), but also in the US and some developing countries.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Econometrics Informing Natural Resources Management:Selected Empirical Analyses|
|English Title:||Econometrics Informing Natural Resources Management:Selected Empirical Analyses|
|Keywords:||Econometrics, natural resources, management|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C01 - Econometrics
|Depositing User:||Phoebe Koundouri|
|Date Deposited:||01. Oct 2012 13:42|
|Last Modified:||23. Apr 2015 18:55|
Antle, J., 1983. Testing the Stochastic Structure of Production: A Flexible Moment-Based Approach. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1, 192-201.
Antle, J., 1987. Econometric Estimation of Producers' Risk Attitudes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 509-522.
Arrow, K., R., Solow, P., R., Portney, E. E., Learner, R., and H. Schuman, 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, Federal Register, 58(10): 4601-4614.
Ajzen I., Brown T. C., Rosenthal L. H., 1996. Information Bias in Contingent Valuation: Effect of Personal Relevance, Quality of Information and Motivational Orientation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 43-57
Bergstrom J. C., Stoll J. R., Randall A., 1989. Information Effects in Contingent Markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(3), 685-691.
Blackorby, C. and Russell, R. R., 1989. Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities. American Economic Review, 79(4), 882-888.
Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models’, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-43.
Boyle K. J., Welsh M. P., Bishop R. C., Baumgartner R. M., 1995. Validating Contingent Valuation with surveys of Experts, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, October, 247-54.
Boxall, P. C., and V., L., Adamovicz, 2002. Understanding heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: The Use of Latent Class Analysis. Environmental and Resources Economics, 23(4): 421-446.
Kenyion W., Edward-Jones G., 1998. What Level of Information Enables the Public to Act like Experts when Evaluating Ecological Goods? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(4), 463-75.
Li, C. Z., and K.G., Lofgren, 2000. Renewable Resources and Economic Sustainability: A Dynamic Analysis with Heterogeneous Time Preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40, 236-250.
Just, R. & R. Pope, 1978. Stochastic Representation of Production Functions and Econometric Implications. Journal of Econometrics 7, 67-86.
Grossman, G., M., and A., B., Krueger (1995), Economic growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2).
Provencher, B., Barenklau, K.A., and R.C., Bishop, 2002. A finite mixture logit model of recreational angling with serially correlated ransom utility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84: 1066-1076.
Taskin, F., and O., Zaim, 2000, Searching for a Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency using kernel estimation. Economic Letters, 68, 217-223.
Train, K., 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, V. K., and W. H., Desvousges, 1986. The Value of Avoiding a LULU: Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68: 93-99.