Ghafele, Roya and Gibert, Benjamin and DiGiammarino, Paul (2011): Crowdsourcing patent application review to capitalize on innovation. Published in: Journal of Intellectual Property Rights , Vol. 4, No. 16 (2011): pp. 303-308.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_38330.pdf Download (322kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Worldwide filings of patent applications and the ensuing invalidation requests have seen staggering growth over the last decade. The result is increasing patent backlog, deteriorating patent quality and an uncertain economic environment. Patent application review is an integral part of the examination procedures undertaken by patent offices before a patent grant is given. Prior art search is a complex and time consuming part of this process. Crowdsourcing this critical stage is a valuable opportunity to render the patent application review process more efficient. This paper describes the crowdsourcing phenomenon and then details how it can aid patent review. The open source review pilot projects of the USPTO and JPO are presented in order to assess the potential of opening prior art search to the wider community of experts and practitioners. Public-private partnerships between patent offices and companies managing online review communities are proposed as a valuable opportunity to leverage the benefits of open review while providing sufficient incentives and quality assurances to yield useful contributions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Crowdsourcing patent application review to capitalize on innovation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Patent application review, prior art search, crowdsourcing, public-private partnerships, patent quality |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 38330 |
Depositing User: | Roya Ghafele |
Date Deposited: | 23 Apr 2012 23:54 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 07:09 |
References: | World Intellectual Property Organization [WIPO]. 2010. World Intellectual Property Indicators: 2010 Edition. Available from: <www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/wipo_pub_941_2010.pdf> (Accessed 8 March 2011). World Intellectual Property Organization [WIPO]. 2009. World Intellectual Property Indicators: 2009 Edition. Available from: <www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/941/wipo_pub_941.pdf> (Accessed 8 March 2011). European Patent Office[EPO]. 2008. Annual Report 2008. Available from: <www.epo.org/about-us/publications/.../annual-reports.html> (Accessed 6 October 2010). Howe, J. 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14, no. 6: 1-4. Albors, J., J.C. Ramos, and J.L. Hervas. 2008. New learning network paradigms: Communities of objectives, crowdsourcing, wikis and open source. International Journal of Information Management 28, no. 3 (June): 194-202. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.09.006. Brabham, D. 2008. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving. Convergence 14, no. 1: 75–90. Surowiecki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. 2004. New York: Random House. Terranova, T. 2004. Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto. Howe, J. 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14, no. 6: 1-4. Noveck, B. S. 2006. Peer to Patent: Collective Intelligence, Open Review, and Patent Reform. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 20, no. 1: 123–162. Center For Patent Innovations [CPI], New York Law School. 2008. Peer-to-Patent Report June 2008. New York, CPI. Available from: <http://dotank.nyls.edu/communitypatent/> (Accessed 2 October 2010). Japanese Patent Office [JPO]. 2010. Community Pilot Review Report. Available from: <www.peertopatent.org/CPR_Pilot_Report.pdf> (Accessed 6 October 2010). Brabham, D. 2008. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving. Convergence 14, no. 1: 75–90. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/38330 |