European Integration and the Peripheral Disparities in Greece. The way ahead

Kavvadia, Helen (2009): European Integration and the Peripheral Disparities in Greece. The way ahead. Published in: Review of decentralisation, local government and regional development , Vol. 56, No. October 2009 (1 October 2009)

Abstract

As the main initiatives in economic and regional policy in Greece focuses on creating favourable conditions for general economic growth and innovation rather than regional redistribution and cohesion, the future of the peripheral areas is largely a local concern and to an increasingly degree depending upon European co-operation and initiatives. Recent studies point to the fact that there has been a convergence in terms of economic development between the countries in the EU during the last two decades. However, simultaneously with the reduced economic disparities at a national level, there has been increasing disparities between regions within countries. Not surprisingly, it is the European capital and metropolitan regions that display the strongest economic growth, while the peripheral and largely rural regions are lagging behind. As a consequence, there has been an increasing spatial polarization in the EU-27 countries. At a policy level, the EU has had its primarily focus on the objectives of economic growth and competitiveness (the Lisbon Strategy) and sustainable development (the Gothenburg Strategy). However, in 2004 the European Commission’s Third Cohesion Report, identified territorial cohesion as a additional strategic policy objective. The instruments for achieving the objective of territorial cohesion is the co-ordination of Regional Policy with various sectoral policies and initiatives. The principle of territorial cohesion has been pushed strongly by the Conference for Peripheral and Maritime Regions (CPMR), founded in 1973. One area where CPMR has been particularly active during the last years is on the initiative taken by the European Commission concerning a future EU Maritime Policy, which has been out for public consultation as a Green Paper between June 2006 and June 2007.

Undoubtedly, Greece is attempting to achieve the EU policy objectives of economic growth and competitiveness (the Lisbon Strategy) and comply with the principles of sustainable development (the Gothenburg Strategy). In doing this, Greek regional policy, as in most of Europe, has undergone a significant shift from being based on direct economic subsidies to the creation of favorable conditions for development and growth. In terms of organization it is also evident that new structures are put in place, which on the one hand strengthens activities at the regional level, and on the other hand secure channels for carrying out governmental national policies. However, while the emphasis on growth and competitiveness is clearly the guiding principle in the Greek economic and regional policy, the issue of territorial cohesion is not addressed explicitly.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: EU economic and regional policy, EU Regional Co-operation, Greece
• Subjects: Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General > Z00 - General

References

Athanassopoulos, C.G. (1988), ‘’Observations compares sur les incitations financiers au développement régional en Grèce (1982-1986)’’, Revue d’Economie et Financière, N7, Paris.

Αθανασόπουλος, K.Γ. (2006), ‘’Θεσμικό πλαίσιο περιφερειακής ανάπτυξης’’, Τόμοι Α, Β, Γ,Ε, Ειδική Εκδοτική, Αθήναι.

Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions - CPMR (2007), ‘’ Final Contribution from the CPMR: Proposals and Points for Consideration. Consultation on the European Commission’s Green Paper on a Maritime Policy for the European Union. Opinion of the CPMR Political Bureau’’, Brussels, May 2007.

Dahlström, M. (2006), ‘’How To Make A Living in Insular Areas – Six Nordic Cases’’, Nordregio Report 1, Stockholm.

Davoudi, S. (2005), ‘’Understanding Territorial Cohesion’’, Planning, Practice & Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, November 2005.

European Spatial Planning Observation Network – ESPON (2006), ‘’ Applied Territorial Research. Building a scientific platform for competitiveness and cohesion’’, ESPON Scientific Report II, Luxembourg.

European Islands System of Links and Exchanges - Eurisles (1997), ‘’ Regional Disparities: Statistical Indicators Linked to Insularity and Ultra-Peripherality’’, Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions - CPMR, Brussels.

European Commission (2006), ‘’Towards A Future Maritime Policy of the Union. A European Vision for the Oceans and Seas’’, Brussels.

European Investment Bank (2005), ‘’Social and economic cohesion’’, Luxembourg.

European Parliament (2007), ‘’Regional Disparities and Cohesion: What Strategies for the Future?’’, Study by the Policy Department Structural and Cohesion Policies, Directorate General Internal Policies of the Union, May 2007, Strasbourg.

Haas, P.M. and Haas, E.B. (2002), ‘’Pragmatic constructivism and the study of international institutions’’, Millenium, Vol 31, No 3, London.

Kokko, A. and Gustavsson, P. (2004), ‘’Regional integration, foreign direct investment, and regional development’’, EIB Papers, Vol 9, No1, Luxembourg

Λάτσου, Σ. (2007), ‘’ Βιώσιμη περιφερειακή ανάπτυξη και κοινοτικές διαρθρωτικές παρεμβάσεις’’, Επιθεώρηση Αποκέντρωσης, Τοπικής Αυτοδιοίκησης και Περιφερειακής Ανάπτυξης, No 49, Αθήναι.