Finding the Optimal Way of Electricity Production in Pakistan

Zeshan, Muhammad (2012): Finding the Optimal Way of Electricity Production in Pakistan. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

Present study reveals the impact of electricity production on economic growth in Pakistan. It covers the period of 1975-2010 and assumes a log-linear relationship between the variables. Both the bounds test and Johansen test for cointegration indicate a unique long-run relationship between the variables. However; higher tariff rates, associated with thermal power plants, are eroding the private business investment in short-run. Based on these facts, this study advocates the promotion of hydropower plants that are beneficial for two reasons. First, it would produce clean power in the country. Second, cost of production would also drop resulting in lower tariff rates. Finally; it finds bi-directional causal relationship between the variables in long-run, whereas no causal relationship has been found in short-run.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Hydropower, Cointegration, Causality
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources

References

• Akinlo, A.E., 2008. Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from 11 Sub-Sahara African countries. Energy Economics 30, 2391-400. • Altinay, G., Karagol, E., 2005. Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics 27, 849-56. • Aqeel, A., Butt, M.S., 2001. The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 8, 101–110. • Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 427–431. • Fatai, K., Oxley, L., Scrimgeour, F.G., 2004. Modelling the causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in New Zealand, Australia, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 64, 431-45. • Ghosh, S., 2002. Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy 30, 125–129. • Ho, C.Y., Siu, K.W., 2007. A dynamic equilibrium of electricity consumption and GDP in • Hong Kong: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 35, 2507-13. • Hydro potential in Pakistan (2010), A report by Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority, [http://wapda.gov.pk/pdf/BrchreHydrpwerPotJuly2010.pdf]. • Khan, A. M., Ahmed, U., 2009. Energy demand in Pakistan: a disaggregate analysis. The Pakistan Development Review 47, 347-455. • Jamil, F., Ahmad, E., 2010. The relationship between electricity consumption, electricity prices and GDP in Pakistan. Energy Policy 38, 6016-6025. • Johansen S., 1991. Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegrating Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models. Econometrica 59, 1551-80. • Johansen, S., 1988. Statistical and hypothesis testing of cointegration vector. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231–254. • Johansen S., Juselius K., 1990. Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegratin with Application to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, 169-209. • Jumbe, C.B.L., 2004. Cointegration and causality between electricity consumption and GDP: empirical evidence from Malawi. Energy Economics 26, 61-8. • Laurenceson J., Chai J., 2003. Financial Reform and Economic Development in China. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar. • Lee, C.C., Chang, C.P., 2005. Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revisited: evidence from Taiwan. Energy Economics 27, 857-72. • Mirzaa, U. K., Ahmada, N., Majeeda, T., Harijanb, K. 2008. Hydropower use in Pakistan: Past, present and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12, 1641–1651. • Morimoto, R., Hope, C., 2004. The impact of electricity supply on economic growth in Sri Lanka. Energy Economics 26, 77-85. • Mozumder, P., Marathe, A., 2007. Causality relationship between electricity consumption and GDP in Bangladesh. Energy Policy 35, 395-402. • Narayan, P. K., 2004a. Reformulating critical values for the bounds F -statictics approach to cointegration: an application to the tourism demand model for Fiji. Department of Economics Discussion Papers No. 02/04, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. • Narayan, P. K., 2004b. An econometric model of tourism demand and a computable general equilibrium analysis of the impact of tourism: the case of the Fiji Islands. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. • Narayan, P. K., 2005. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests, Applied Economics 37, 1979-1990. • Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R., 2005. Electricity consumption, employment, and real income in • Australia: evidence from multivariate Granger causality tests. Energy Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 1109-16. • Narayan, P.K., Singh, B., 2007. The electricity consumption and GDP nexus for the Fiji Islands. Energy Economics 29, 1141–1150. • Nasir, M., TARIQ, M. S., ARIF, A., 2008. Residential Demand for Electricity in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 47, 457–467. • Noor, S., and Siddiqi, M. W., 2010. Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in South Asian Countries: A Co-integrated Panel Analysis. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 5, 14 2010. • Pesaran, M.H., Pesaran B., 1997. Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press. • Pesaran, M.H., Shin Y., Smith, R.J., 2001. Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16, 289-326. • Shahbaz, M., Tang, C. F., Shabbir, M. S., 2011. Electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in Portugal using cointegration and causality approaches. Energy Policy 39, 3529-3536. • Shahbaz, M., Lean, H. H., 2012. Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy 40, 473–479. • Shiu, A., Lam, P.L., 2004. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy 32, 47-54. • Weynand, G., 2007. Energy Sector Assessment for USAID/Pakisttan. Energy Team Office of Infrastructure & Engineering Bureau for Economic Growth, Agriculture, & Trade United States Agency for International Development. • Wolde-Rufael, Y., 2004. Disaggregated industrial energy consumption and GDP: the case of Shanghai, 1952-1999. Energy Economics 26, 69-75. • Yang, H.Y., 2000. A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan. Energy Economics 22, 309-17. • Yoo, S.H., 2005. Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Korea. Energy Policy 33, 1627-32. • Yoo, S.H., Kim, Y., 2006. Electricity generation and economic growth in Indonesia. Energy 31, 2890-9. • Yoo, S.H., 2006. The causal relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN countries. Energy Policy 34, 3573-82. • Yuan, J., Zhao, C., Yu, S., Hu, Z., 2007. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Economics 29, 1179-91. • Yuan, J., Kang, J., Zhao, C., Hu, Z., 2008. Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from China at both aggregated and disaggregated levels”, Energy Economics 30, 3077-94. • Zahid, A., 2008. Energy–GDP relationship: A causal analysis for the five countries of South Asia. Applied Econometrics and International Development 1, 167-180. • Zamani, M., 2007. Energy consumption and economic activities in Iran. Energy Economics 29, 1135-40. • Ziramba, E., 2009. Disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in South Africa. Energy Policy 37, 2214–2220.