Yamamura, Eiji (2012): Effects of siblings and birth order on income redistribution preferences.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_38658.pdf Download (411kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Japanese General Social Survey was used to determine how individual preferences for income redistribution are affected by family structure, such as the number of siblings and birth order where individuals grow up. After controlling for various individual characteristics, the important findings were as follows. (1) The first-born child was less likely to prefer income redistribution when the child was male. However, such a tendency was not observed when the child was female. (2) The larger the number of elder brothers, the more likely an individual preferred income redistribution. However, the number of elder sisters did not affect the preference. (3) The number of younger siblings did not affect a male’s preference for redistribution regardless of the sibling’s sex. The number of younger brothers did not affect a female’s preference, whereas the number of younger sisters was associated with females preferring income redistribution. These findings regarding the effect of birth order are not consistent with evidence provided by a study conducted in a European country (Fehr et al 2008).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effects of siblings and birth order on income redistribution preferences. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Birth order, Siblings, preference for redistribution |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions |
Item ID: | 38658 |
Depositing User: | eiji yamamura |
Date Deposited: | 08 May 2012 12:26 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:41 |
References: | Akerlof, G.A., Kranton,R.E. 2000. Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3), 715-753. Alesina, A.,Angeletos, G.M. 2005. Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review 95 (4), 960-980. Alesina, A., De Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. 2004. Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics 88, 2009-2042. Alesina, A. Giuliano, P. 2009. Preferences for redistribution. NBER Working Papers 14825. Alesina, A.,La Ferrara, E. 2005. Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics 89, 897-931. Alger, I., Weibull, J.W. 2010. Kinship, incentives, and evolution. American Economic Review 100, 1725-1758. Aristei, D., Perugini, C. 2010. Preferences for redistribution and inequality in well-being across Europe. Journal of Policy Modeling 32, 176-195. Averett, S. L., Argys, L. M., Rees, D. I. 2011. Older siblings and adolescent risky behavior: Does parenting play a role? Journal of Population Economics 24(3), 957-978. Becker, G. S., 1960. An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Universities-National Bureau Conference Series, No. 11. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Becker, G. S., Lewis, H. G. 1973. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81(2), S279-S288. Becker, G. S., Tomes,N. 1976. Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 84(4), S143-S162. Benjamin, D.J., Choi, J.J., Strckland, A.J. 2010. Social identity and preferences. American Economic Review 100, 1913-1928. Berman, J., Taubman, P. 1986. Birth order schooling, and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics 4, 121-145. Björklund, A., Ginther, D.K., Sundstöm, M. 2007. Family structure and child outcomes in the USA and Sweden. Journal of Population Economics 20, 183-201. Black,S., Devereux, P.J., Salvanes,K.G. 2005. The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children’s education. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, 669-700. Cáceres-Delpiano, J. 2006. The impact of family size on investment in child quality. Journal of Human Resources 41, 738-754. Chamarbagwala, R. 2011. Sibling composition and selective gender-based survival bias. Journal of Population Economics 24 (3), 935-955. Chang, W-C. 2010. Religion and preferences for redistributive policies in an East Asian country. Poverty & Public Policy, 2(4) article 5. Cho, H. 2011. Birth order and education: evidence from a Korean cohort. Economics Letters 110, 200-202. Corneo, G. and Grüner, H. P. 2002. Individual preferences for political distribution. Journal of Public Economics 83, 83-107. Dammert, A. C. 2010. Siblings, child labor, and schooling in Nicaragua and Guatemala. Journal of Population Economics 23(1), 199-224. Dayiogru, M., Kirdar, M.G., Tansel, A. 2009. Impact of sibship size, birth order and sex composition on school enrolment in Urban Turkey. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71(3), 399-426. Derin-Güre, P, Uler, N. 2010. Charitable giving under inequality aversion. Economics Letters 107, 208-210. Edmonds, E, V. 2006. Understanding sibling differences in child labor. Journal of Population Economics, 19 (4), 795-821. Eugster, B., Lalive, R., Steinhauer, A., Zweimuller, J. 2011. The demand for social insurance: does culture matter? Economic Journal 121, F413-F448. Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., Rockenbach, B. 2008. Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454(28), 1079-1083. Fehr, E., Hoff, K. 2011. Introduction: Tastes, castes and culture: The influence of society on preferences. Economic Journal 121, F396-F412. Fehr, E., Naef, M., Schmidt,Klaus M. 2006. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximum preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment. American Economic Review 96, 1912-1917. Fehr, E., Schmidt,Klaus M. 1999. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817-868. Fernandez, R., Fogli, A., and Olivetti, C. 2004. Mothersand sons: Preference formation and female labor force dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(4), 1249–1299. Garg, A., Morduch, J. 1998. Sibling rivalry and the gender gap: Evidence from child health outcomes in Ghana. Journal of Population Economics 11, 471-493. Greene, W. (1997). Econometric Analysis (3 Eds.), London: Prentice-Hall. Hanushek, E.A. 1992. The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy 100(1), 84-117. Hayami, Y. 2001. Development economics: From poverty to the wealth of nations. (second edition). New York: Oxford University Press. Kantrevic, J., Mechoulan, S. 2006. Birth order, educational attainment and earnings: an investigation using the PSID. Journal of Human Resources 41, 755-777. Kawaguchi, D., Miyazaki,J. 2009. Working mothers and sons’ preferences regarding female labor supply: direct evidence from stated preferences. Journal of Population Economics 22(1), 115-130. Kawashima, T. 1963. “Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan,” in A. von Mehren, ed. Law in Japan: The Legal Order in a Changing Society. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. Kessler, D. 1991, Birth order, family size, and achievement: family structure and wage determination. Journal of Labor Economics 9, 413-426. Klor, E. F., Shayo, M., 2010. Social identity and preferences over redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 94, 269-278. Lampi, E. Nordblom, K. 2010. Money and success-sibling and birth order effects on positional concerns, Journal of Economic Psychology 31, 131-142. Lampi, E. Nordblom, K. 2012.Nature and nurture: the relation between number of siblings and earnings, Applied Economics Letters 19, 759-762. Lee, J. 2008. Sibling size and investment in children’s education: an asian instrument. Journal of Population Economics 21, 855-875. Luttmer, E. 2005. Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3), 963-1002. Luttmer, E. 2011.Culture, context, and the taste for redistribution. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 3 (1), 157-179. Makepeace, G., Pal., S. 2008. Undestanding the effect of siblings on child mortality: evidence from India. Journal of Population Economics 21, 877-902. Mazumder, B. 2008. Sibling similarity and economic inequality in the US. Journal of Population Economics 21, 685-701. McBride, M. 2001. Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the corss-section. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 45, 251-278. Oettinger, G.S. 2000. Sibling similarity in high school graduate outcomes: causal interdependency or unobserved heterogeneity? Southern Economic Journal 66, 631-648. Ohtake, F., Tomioka, J. 2004. Who supports redistribution? Japanese Economic Review 55(4), 333-354. Rainer, H., S, T. 2008. Subjective income and employment expectations and preferences for redistribution. Economics Letters 99, 449-453. Ravallion, M., Lokshin, M. 2000. Who wants to redistribute? The tunnel effect in 1990 Russia. Journal of Public Economics 76, 87-104. Stutzer, A. 2004. The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 54(1), 89-109. Yamagishi, T. 1988a. The probision of sanctionning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly 51(3), 265-271. Yamagishi, T. 1988b. Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24, 530-542. Yamamura, E., 2012. Social capital, household income, and expressed preferences for income redistribution. Forthcoming in European Journal of Political Economy. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/38658 |