Kabir, ASM (2007): Sanguinity and aspiration toward South Asian Regional integration: a case study of the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) Agreement.
Download (124kB) | Preview
The expansion of regional economic cooperation was one of the major developments in the world political economy after the Second World War. Factors that thrust countries closer were both economic and political but economic factors prevailed; the classic example was the EU and ASEAN where economic dimension have brought long time foes in the same dais. The present international economic situation characterized by stagnant growth, recessionary conditions, and protectionist tendencies in the developed countries has seriously underpinned the economic growth in developing countries. The worsening terms of trade, acute balance of payment crisis and debt burden on developing countries have further crippled the potential economic growth of these countries. Therefore current world economic conditions call for a greater economic cooperation among the developing countries. Around 330 agreements are notified in World Trade Organization (WTO). Apart from Mongolia, all WTO members are involved in one or more regional trade agreements. Unsuccessful WTO talks in Cancun increased a world-wide trend towards regional cooperation and integration, such as EU, NAFTA, CAFTA, MERCOSUR, ASEAN, SAARC etc. The latest report by the World Bank, entitled Global Economic Prospects: Managing the Next Wave of Globalization predicts that in the next 25 years the growth in the global economy will be powered by the developing countries, whose share in global output will increase from about one-fifth of the global economy to nearly one-third. It means that some of the key drivers in the global economy will be China and some of the countries from South Asia. There are today six developing countries which have populations greater than 100 million and GDP of more than $100 billion. By 2030, there will be 10 countries that would have reached the twin 100s threshold, and four of them will be from the vicinity of South Asia. In addition to India and China, who have already reached that level, Pakistan and Bangladesh are also likely to be part of this dynamic group. Increased participation in global trade was an important determinant of economic growth of the catch-up economies. This is one reason why South Asia has lagged and has not been a catch-up economy. Could the decision of the 2004 SAARC summit change South Asia’s economic structure and move towards economic union? Can South Asia become a major player in the global economic and trading system? The following report aims to come across the answer of the above issue regarding SAFTA.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||university of east london|
|Original Title:||Sanguinity and aspiration toward South Asian Regional integration: a case study of the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) Agreement|
|Keywords:||REGIONALISM: BUILDING BLOCK OR STUMBLING BLOCK?; WTO PROVISIONS FOR PTAS/RTAS; Trade Facilitation; South Asian position:|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations
|Depositing User:||ASM KABIR|
|Date Deposited:||15. Oct 2007|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 17:21|
Arnold, John (2004). “Bangladesh Logistics and Trade Facilitation,” Washington, D.C.: World Bank 2004.
Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) (2003). “Vietnam Individual Action Plan: Customs Procedures.”
Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) (1999). Assessing APEC Trade Liberalization and Facilitation: 1999 Update, Economic Committee, September 1999. APEC: Singapore.
Baier, S.L. and J.H. Bergstrand (2001). “The Growth of World Trade: Tariffs, Transport Costs, and Income Similarity.” Journal of International Economics, February 53(1): 1-27.
Business Standard (2004). “Nhava Sheva Port in Jam.” Business Standard. (August 6). Mumbai. http://www.businessstandard.com/common/storypage.php?hpFlag=Y&chklogin=N&autono=163402&leftnm=lmnu2&lselect=0&leftindx=2
Chandra D Bhatta. Regional integration and peace in South Asia: An analysis. 2004.
Clark, Ximena, David Dollar, Alejandro Micco (2004). “Port Efficiency, Maritime Transport Costs and Bilateral Trade.” Working Paper 10353. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cook, Robin. 2004. A Strong Europe or Bush’s Feral US Capitalism: The Guardian, October 29.
Daily Mirror (2003). “US Takes Lanka on Board Container Security Initiative.” Daily Mirror. (June 27).
Frankel, J. A., E. Stein, and S. J. Wei. 1997. Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Ghosh, S. and S. Yamraik. Are Regional Trading Arrangements Trade Creating? An Analysis of Extreme Bounds Analysis: Journal of International Economics, 63, 369-95.
Gorkhapatra Daily (2004). “Reform in Customs Boosts Revenue.” Gorkhapatra Daily.January 24. http://www.gorkhapatra.org.np/pageloader.php?file=2004/01/26/topstories/main3
Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance (MoF). “Three Years Customs Reform and Modernization Action Plan 2003-2006.”
Hall, Magnolia. THE COMMONWEALTH BUSINESS COUNCIL SAFTA ROUNDTABLE ACHIEVING THE SOUTH ASIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (SAFTA): A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP? 15th-16th December 2004. The India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, India.
Hirantha. Seekkuwa Wasam. 2004. From SAPTA to SAFTA: Gravity Analysis of South Asian Free Trade: University of Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka.
Hindu Business Line (2004). “CII Urges Use of Electronic Media for Trade Facilitation.” Hindu Business Line. (July 5): pp. 1. http://www.blonnet.com/2004/07/05/stories/2004070501580500.htm
Hindu Business Line (2001). “India, Nepal Discuss Trade, Transit Treaty.” Hindu Business Line. (August 10): pp. 1. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/businessline/2001/08/10/stories/141032bb.htm
Hindu Business Line (2000). “India: Panja for Rapid Economic Integration.” Hindu Business Line. (May 11): pp. 1.
Jayatilleke S Bandara and Wusheng Yu.2001. How desirable is the South Asian free trade area? A quantitative assessment: 77th EAAE Seminar / NJF Seminar No. 325, August 17-18, 2001, Helsinki.
Karmacharya, Binod K.(2002). “Facilitating Trade in SASEC Region in the Perspective of Recent Developments: A Case Study of India and Nepal.” Paper presented for Asian Development Bank: South Asia Business Forum (SABF), South Asia Sub-regional Economic Cooperation (SASEC), 12-13 August 2002, New Delhi, India.
Krueger, Elizabeth. (2004). “Impact of South Asia Free Trade Agreement.” Policy Analysis Workshop, Public Affairs 869.
Lahiri, S. 1998. Controversy: Regionalism Versus Multilateralism. The Economic Journal Vol.108, p. 1,126-1,127.
Spring. Madison, Wisconsin: La Follette School of Public Affairs University of Wisconsin, Madison. http://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workshops/2003-2004/pa869/2004- SAFTA.pdf
South Asia Regional Integration Bangladesh Country Note. “Promoting Regional Integration in South Asia: A Private Sector Perspective.” The World Bank/ International Monetary Fund, 2004 Annual Meetings Program of Seminars, October 1, 2004 Washington, D.C.
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2003. Globalization and Its Discontents. Norton: New York. USITC. 2004. COMTRADE Statistics 2004.
Winters L. Alan. 2004. Trade Liberalization and Economic Performance: An Overview. The Economic Journal, 114 (February), pp. F4-F.
What Does Regional Trade in South Asia Reveal about Future Trade Integration? Some Empirical Evidence: By Nihal Pitigala. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3497, February 2005.
World Bank. 1993. The East Asian Miracle Economic Growth and Public Policy. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2004a. Global Economic Prospects, 2005. Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2004b. Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism and Development. Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2004c. South Asia Free Trade Area: Promise and Pitfalls of Preferential Trade Arrangements. Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2004d. Trade Policies in South Asia: An Overview, 2004. Report #29949. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2004e. World Development Indicators 2006.