Dong, Baomin and Ni, Debing and Wang, Yuntong (2012): Sharing a polluted river network. Forthcoming in: Environmental and Resource Economics
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_38839.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
A polluted river network is populated with agents (e.g., firms, villages, municipalities, or countries) located upstream and downstream. This river network must be cleaned, the costs of which must be shared among the agents. We model this problem as a cost sharing problem on a tree network. Based on the two theories in international disputes, namely the Absolute Territorial Sovereignty (ATS) and the Unlimitted Territorial Integrity (UTI), we propose three different cost sharing methods for the problem. They are the Local Responsibility Sharing (LRS), the Upstream Equal Sharing (UES), and the Downstream Equal Sharing (DES), respectively. The LRS and the UES generalize Ni and Wang ("Sharing a polluted river", Games Econ. Behav., 60 (2007), 176-186) but the DES is new. The DES is based on a new interpretation of the UTI. We provide axiomatic characterizations for the three methods. We also show that they coincide with the Shapley values of the three different games that can be defined for the problem. Moreover, we show that they are in the cores of the three games, respectively. Our methods can shed light on pollution abatement of a river network with multiple sovereignties.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Sharing a polluted river network |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | River network, Water pollution, Cost sharing, the Shapley value |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C71 - Cooperative Games D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis |
Item ID: | 38839 |
Depositing User: | Baomin Dong |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2012 03:10 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 05:02 |
References: | Aadland D. and Kolpin V., 1998. Shared irrigation costs: An empirical and axiomatic analysis. Mathematical Social Sciences 849, 203-218. Ambec, S., 2008. Sharing a resource with concave benefits. Social Choice and Welfare 31, 1-13 Ambec, S., Ehlers, L., 2008a. Sharing a river among satiable agents. Games and Economic Behavior, 64(1): 35-50 Ambec, S., Ehlers, L., 2008b. Cooperation and equity in the river sharing problem. In Game Theory and Policy Making in Natural Resources and the Environment, edited by Arial Dinar et al., Routledge Publishers. Ambec, S., Sprumont, Y., 2002. Sharing a River. Journal of Economic Theory 107, 453-462. Ansink, E. and Ruijs, A., 2008, Climate change and the stability of water allocation agreements, Environmental and Resource Economics, 41:249-266 Barrett, S., 1994. Conflict and cooperation in managing international water resources, Working Paper 1303, World Bank, Washington. Coase, R., 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 1, 1-14. Godana, B., 1985. Africa's shared water resources, France Printer, London. Hung, M-F. and Shaw, D., 2005, A trading-ratio system for trading water pollution discharge permits, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49:83-102 Kilgour, M. and Dinar, A., 1996. Are stable agreements for sharing international river waters now possible? Working Paper 1474, World Bank, Washington. Kilgour, M. and Dinar, A., 2001, Flexible water sharing within an international river basin, Environmental and Resource Economics, 18:43-60 Littlechild, S. and Owen, G., 1973. A Simple Expression for the Shapley Value in a Special Case. Management Science 20, 370-372. Littlechild, S., and Thompson G., 1977. Aircraft landing fees: a game theoretic approach. The Bell Journal of Economics 8, 186-204. Marchiori, C., 2010, Concern for fairness and incentives in water negotiations, Environmental and Resource Economics 45:553-571 Moulin, H., 2002. Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., and Suzumura, K. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Volume 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam. Moulin, H., 2011. Cost sharing in networks: some open questions. Working paper, Rice University. Ni, D. and Wang, Y., 2007. Sharing a Polluted River. Games and Economic Behavior 60, 176-186. Van den Brink, J. R. and Gilles, R. P., 1996. Axiomatizations of the Conjunctive Permission Value for Games with Permission Structures. Games and Economic Behavior 12, 113-126. Shapley, L. S., 1953. A Value for n-Person Games. In: H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Annals of Mathematics Studies 28, 307-17. Shapley, L. S. 1971. Core of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory 1: 11-26 Wang, Y.. 2011. Trading water along a river. Mathematical Social Sciences 61: 124-130 Weber, M. L., 2001. Markets for Water Rights under Environmental Constraints. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42, 53-64. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/38839 |