Behavioral dynamics of tax compliance under an information services initiative

McKee, Michael and Siladke, Caleb and Vossler, Christian A. (2011): Behavioral dynamics of tax compliance under an information services initiative.

Abstract

Tax authorities utilize the audit process, imposing penalties on tax evaders, as their primary means of enforcement. In recent years, a “service” paradigm, whereby tax authorities provide information about correct tax reporting to taxpayers, has shown the potential to further “encourage” correct tax reporting. This research utilizes laboratory experiments to investigate the behavioral dynamics pertaining to information acquisition and tax evasion. The results show that the overall effect of a helpful information service is to decrease tax evasion. Further, an audit has the behavioral effect of lowering information acquisition rates and increasing evasion immediately after experiencing a penalty. This effect persists (although diminishes) in subsequent tax reporting decisions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Tax evasion; Tax compliance; Behavioral Dynamics; Behavioral economics; Experimental economics
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion and Avoidance

References

Alm, James, Kim Bloomquist, and Michael McKee, 2011, “On the External Validity of Tax Compliance Experiments,” prepared for presentation at 2011 IRS Research Conference, Washington, DC.

Alm, James, Todd Cherry, Michael Jones, and Michael McKee, 2008. “Encouraging Filing via Tax Credits and Social Safety Nets,” The IRS Research Bulletin: Proceedings of the2008 IRS Research Conference, pp 43 – 57.

____________________________________________, 2010.“Taxpayer Information Assistance Services and Tax Reporting Behavior.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31 (4): 577-586.

Alm, James, Betty R. Jackson, and Michael McKee. 1992a. “Estimating the Determinants of Taxpayer Compliance with Experimental Data.” National Tax Journal 65 (1): 107-114.

__________________________________. 1992b. “Institutional Uncertainty and Taxpayer Compliance,” American Economic Review, 82 (4): 1018-1026.

____________________________________________. 2009. “Getting the Word Out: Enforcement Information Dissemination and Tax Compliance Behavior.” Journal of Public Economics 93 (3-4): 392-402.

Alm, James and Michael McKee. 2006. “Audit Certainty and Taxpayer Compliance.” National Tax Journal 59 (4): 801-816.

Andreoni, James, Brian Erard, and Jonathan Feinstein. 1998. “Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (2): 818-860.

Cadsby, C. Bram, Elizabeth Maynes, and Viswanath Umashanker Trivedi. 2006. “Tax Compliance and Obedience to Authority at Home and in the Lab: A New Experimental Approach,” Experimental Economics, 9 (4): 343-359.

Erard, Brian, 1992, “The Influence of Tax Audits on Reporting Behavior,” in Joel Slemrod (ed), Why People Pay Taxes, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

Feld, Lars and Bruno Frey. 2002. “Trust Breeds trust: How Taxpayers are Treated,” Economics of Governance, 3: 87-99.

Gravell, Jane, 2008, “Comments,” The IRS Research Bulletin: Proceedings of the 2008 IRS Research Conference, pp 59-60.

Greiner, Ben, 2004. “The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 - A Guide for the Organization of Experiments in Economics,” Working Paper Series in Economics 10, University of Cologne, Department of Economics.

Kastlunger, B., E. Kirchler, L. Mittone, and J. Pitters. 2009. “Sequences of Audits, Tax Compliance and Taxpaying Strategies,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (3): 405-18.

Maciejovsky, B., E. Kirchler, and H. Schwarzenberger. 2007. “Misperception of Chance and Loss Repair: On the Dynamics of Tax Compliance, Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (6): 678-91.

Mittone, L., 2006, “Dynamic Behavior in Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach,” Journal of Socio-Economics, 35 (5): 813-835.

Plott, Charles R. 1987. “Dimensions of Parallelism: Some Policy Applications of Experimental Methods.” In Alvin E. Roth (ed.), Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, Vernon. 1982. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.” The American Economic Review 72 (5): 923-955.

Vossler, Christian, Michael McKee, Michael Jones, 2010, “The Impact of Taxpayer Information Services on Tax Reporting and Tax Filing,” presented at the 2010 meetings of the Southern Economics Association, Atlanta, GA.