Haq, Rashida (2009): Measuring human wellbeing in Pakistan: objective versus subjective indicators. Published in: European Journal of Social Sciences , Vol. 9, No. 3 (2009): pp. 516-532.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_38968.pdf Download (252kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The concern for measuring wellbeing objectively and subjectively is found in modern political philosophy. This study explores objective indicators versus subjective perceptions of human wellbeing in ranking of survey data for districts of Pakistan. Data used for the analysis is ‘The Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey’ for the year 2006-07. The human wellbeing is examined in four domains: education, health, living conditions and economic situation. Principal component analysis is employed for indexing human wellbeing for hundred districts, rated in five quintiles are generated. The paper demonstrates the importance of education domain in determining the human wellbeing. Objective indicators of education: literacy rate, net primary enrolment and gender equality in education are positively correlated with subjective satisfaction in education facilities. Economic status of the households and communities are important variables in subjective perception of wellbeing. The results indicate substantial variation in objective wellbeing among districts of Pakistan It may be considered that disparity in objective condition and in subjective perceptions are adequately depicting wellbeing differences.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Measuring human wellbeing in Pakistan: objective versus subjective indicators |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Well-being; objective indicators; subjective indicators; quality of life; ranking |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics |
Item ID: | 38968 |
Depositing User: | Nabeela Arshad |
Date Deposited: | 24 May 2012 13:03 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 18:58 |
References: | [1] Akhtar, S., and Sarwer, M.N. (2007). Social development and quality of living in districts of Pakistan. Comparative ranking between 1998 and 2004-05, Centre for Research on Poverty Reduction and Income Distribution. Discussion paper series No: 16. [2] Bradshaw,Y.W., & Fraser,E. (1989). City size, economic development and quality of life in Chaina: New Empirical Evidence. America Sociological Review. 54, 986-1003. [3] Campbell, A. (981) The sense of wellbeing in America. (McGraw-Hill, New York) [4] Campbell,A., Converse, P.E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The perceived quality of life and its implications. In A. Campbell,P.E. Converse & W.L. Rodgers (Eds.), The qualiy of American life (pp.471-508). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [5] Diener, E. (1995). A value based index for measuring national quality of life. Social Indicators Research 36, pp. 107–127. [6] Diener, E., M.Diener and C. Diener (1995). Factor predicting the subjective wellbeing of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(5), pp.851-864. [7] Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., and Helliwell, J. (2008). Well Being and Public Policy. Oxford University Press. [8] Diener, E. and Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators, Social Indicators Research, 40, pp. 189-216. [9] Ghaus, A.F.A, Hafiz, A. Pasha and Rafia Ghaus.(1996). Social development ranking of districts of Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 35:4, Part II, 593-614. [10] Jamal, H., and Amir, K. J. (2007). Trends in regional human development indices.Research report No.73. Social Policy Development Centre, Islamabad. [11] Land, K. C. (1996). Social indicators and the quality of life: Where do we stand in the mid-1990s?’, SINET [Science Information Network] 45, pp. 5–8. [12] Lewis,S., & Lyo, L. (1986). The quality of community and the quality of life. Sociological Spectrum, 6, 397-410. [13] Midhet, F.(2004). Development ranking of rural districts of Pakistan: A methodology to identity contextual determinants of safe motherhood. Population Association of Pakistan. [14] Murtag , F. and Heck, A. (1987). Multivariate data analysis. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland. [15] Pakistan, Government of (2008). Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey (2006-2007).Federal Bureau of Statistics, Islamabad. [16] Pasha, A.G., and Naeem, A. (1999). Pakistan’s ranking in social development: Have we always been backward? The Pakistan Development Review 38(4), 739-754. [17] Pasha, H. A., and H. Tariq, (1982). Development ranking of districts of Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics Vol. I (2), 157-192. [18] Pasha, H.A. (1990). The changing profile of regional development in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, 9(1), 1-26. [19] Prescott-Allen, R. (2001). The Wellbeing of Nations: A Country-by-Country Index of Quality of Life and the Environment. Washington DC: Island Press. [20] Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 89, 41-60. [21] Sen, A.K., (1993). Capability and well-being, in M.C. Nussbaum and A.K. Sen (eds), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press. [22] Siddiqui, R. (2008) Income, public social services, and capability development: A cross-district analysis of Pakistan. Working papers No. 43. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad. [23] Suh,K.T, E, Diener and F.Fujita (1996). Events and subjective Wellbeing: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70, pp.1091-1102. [24] Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Claredon Press. [25] Uddin, F. (2007) State of social development in Pakistan: Issues of access and quality. Pakistan Economy: An assessment with special reference to quality of life. Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad. [26] United Nation Development Programme (UNDP) (2007). Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in divided world. Human Development Report 2007/2008. New York, USA. [27] United Nation Development Programme (UNDP) (2003). Pakistan National Human Development Report 2003. Poverty , Growth and Governance. UNDP, Pakistan. [28] Veenhoven, R.(2007). Subjective measures of well-Being, In: Mc Gillvray (Ed.) Human Wellbeing, Concepts and Measurement, Palgrave/McMillan, 2007, Houndmills, New Hampshire,USA, Chapter 9,pp.214-239 ISBN 10-0-230-00498-9. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/38968 |