Li, Yan and Pittman, Russell (2012): The proposed merger of AT&T and T-Mobile: Are there unexhausted scale economies in U.S. mobile telephony?
Download (405kB) | Preview
From the beginning, the debate on the likely results of the proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA by AT&T focused more on the claims of the parties that “immense” merger efficiencies would overwhelm any apparent losses of competition than on the presence or absence of those losses, and the factors that might affect them, such as market definition. The companies based their “economic model” of the merger on estimates of efficiencies on AT&T’s “engineering model”, without addressing the credibility of the results of the latter in the context of the economics literature on the telecommunications sector. In this paper we first argue that the economics literature on economies of scale (especially) and economies of density in mobile telephony suggests caution in expecting such massive cost reductions from increasing the size of an already very large firm. We then present new econometric evidence from an international data base supporting the notion that most large mobile telephone service providers have reached the point of constant or even (rarely) declining returns to scale.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The proposed merger of AT&T and T-Mobile: Are there unexhausted scale economies in U.S. mobile telephony?|
|Keywords:||merger efficiencies; economies of scale; economies of density; mobile telephony; antitrust; stochastic frontier analysis|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L96 - Telecommunications
K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law
D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity
L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L40 - General
|Depositing User:||Russell Pittman|
|Date Deposited:||26. May 2012 16:04|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 02:11|
AAI, “The Effect of AT&T’s Acquisition of T-Mobile Is Likely to Substantially Lessen Competition.” Washington, DC: American Antitrust Institute, August 2011.
Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 30(9): 1078-1092.
Baumol, W.J. (1976). “Scale Economies, Average Cost, and the Profitability of Marginal Cost Pricing.” In Public and Urban Economics, ed. R.E. Grieson. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath/Lexington Books.
Bruner, F., K. Eades, R. Harris and R. Higgins (1998), “Best practices in estimating the cost of capital: Survey and synthesis”, Financial Practice and Education, 8(1): 13-28.
Cave, Martin, Sumit Majumdar, and Ingo Vogelsang, “Structure, Regulation and Competition in the Telecommunications Industry.” In Cave, Majumdar, and Vogelsang, eds., Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, vol. 1: Structure, Regulation and Competition. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2002.
Caves, Douglas, Laurits Christensen, and Michael Tretheway, “Economies of density versus economies of scale: why trunk and local service airline costs differ,” Rand Journal of Economics 15 (1984), 471-489.
Chambers, R. G. (1988), Applied Production Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, Howard, David Evans, and Richard Schmalensee, “AT&T/T-Mobile: Does Efficiency Really Count?” CPI Antitrust Chronicle 2 (2011).
Christensen Associates, A Study of Competition in the U.S. Freight Railroad Industry and Analysis of Proposals that Might Enhance Competition. Study for the Surface Transportation Board. Madison, WI: Laurits R. Christensen Associates, 2008.
Coelli, T.J. and S. Perelman (1996), “Efficiency Measurement, Multiple Output Technologies and Distance Functions: With Application to European Railways,” European Journal of Operational Research, 117: 326-339.
Dennis, Scott, and Wayne Talley, eds., Railroad Economics (Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 20). Oxford: Elsevier, 2007.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. Lovell (1994), Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Farrell, M. (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3): 253-290.
FCC, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Mobile Wireless, Including Commercial Mobile Services (14th Report). Washington: Federal Communications Commission, May 20, 2010.
Gabel, David, and Mark Kennet, “Estimating the Cost Structure of the Local Telephone Exchange Network.” Report No. 91-16, National Regulatory Research Institute, October 1991.
Gagnepain, Philippe, and Pedro Pereira, “Entry, costs reduction, and competition in the Portuguese mobile telephony industry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 25 (2007), 461-481.
Goldfarb, Charles, “The Proposed AT&T/T-Mobile Merger: Would It Create a Virtuous Cycle or a Vicious Cycle?” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, May 10, 2011.
Greene, W.H. (2004a), “Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(1): 7-32.
---- (2004b), “Distinguishing Between Heterogeneity and Inefficiency: Stochastic Frontier Analysis of the World Health Organization’s Panel Data on National Health Care Systems,” Health Economics, 13: 959-980.
---- (2005), “Reconsidering Heterogeneity in Panel Data Estimators of the Stochastic Frontier Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 126(2): 269-303.
Grunes, Allen, and Maurice Stucke, “Antitrust Review of the AT&T/T-Mobile Transaction.” Federal Communications Law Journal 64 (2011), 47-85.
Kahn, Alfred E., The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions. New York: Wiley, 1971.
Li, Y. and B. Lyons (2012), “Market structure, Regulation and the Speed of Mobile Network Penetration”, ESRC Centre for Competition Policy, Working Paper: 12-03.
McKenzie, David, and John Small, “Econometric Cost Structure Estimates for Cellular Telephony in the United States.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 12 (1997), 147-157.
Marshall, Alfred, Principles of Economics (8th Ed.). Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, 1982 (reprint of 1920 edition).
Nam, Changi, Youngsun Kwon, Seongcheol Kim, and Hyeongjik Lee, “Estimating scale economies of the wireless telecommunications industry using EVA data.” Telecommunications Policy 33 (2009), 29-40.
Pittman, Russell, “Options for Restructuring the State-Owned Monopoly Railway.” In Dennis and Talley (2007). Ray, D. (1998), Development Economics, Princeton: Princeton U. Press.
Savignat, M.G. and Chris Nash, “The case for rail reform in Europe: Evidence from studies of production characteristics of the rail industry.” International Journal of Transport Economics 26 (1999), 201-217.
Truong G., G. Partington and M. Peat (2008), “Cost of capital estimation and capital budgeting practice in Australia”, Australian Journal of Management, 33: 1-6.
Vendruscolo, Maria Ivanice, and Tiago Wickstrom Alves, “Study of the scale economy in the Brazilian mobile telecommunication sector after privatizations” (in Portuguese). Revista Contabilidade & Financas (2009).
Viner, Jacob, “Cost Curves and Supply Curves.” In George Stigler and Kenneth Boulding, eds., Readings in Price Theory. Chicago: Irwin, 1952, for the American Economic Association (from Zeitschrift für Nationalkonomie, 1931).
Vogelsang, Ingo, “The relationship between mobile and fixed-line communications: A survey.” Information Economics and Policy 22 (2010), 4-17.
Waters, William G. II, “Evolution of Railroad Economics.” In Dennis and Talley (2007).
Weyl, E. Glen, and Michal Fabinger, “A Restatement of the Theory of Monopoly.” Unpublished paper, June 2011, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1851326.