Stravelakis, Nikos (2012): Why recession and depression policies differ.
This draft presents a model of internally generated growth and effective demand. It is constructed with the rationale of separating fast and slow variables. Slow variables appear as parameters. We show the reaction of profit growth to different rates of profit (slow variable) through the variation of the rate of interest and the price level (fast variables). The model is within the classical / Marxist tradition in the sense that profitability is the driving force of capital accumulation and the Marxist / post Keynesian tradition in the sense that the rate of interest is a purely monetary phenomenon depending on the competition between borrowers and lenders. Although we let prices and the rate of savings adjust to the rate of capital accumulation and the rate of interest respectively the prevailing rate of profit is the dominant force of accumulation giving insights on the characteristics of depressions and the effectiveness of various policies in that context. More specifically, the model shows the difference between fluctuations in profitability and production which characterize a recession to a standstill in profit growth which is the mark of a depression. As we will show savings adjustments are sufficient to bring an economy out of recession but are totally ineffective in depressions. Therefore, recession and depression policies should differ significantly not only quantitatively but also qualitatively. In a depression increasing, bank liquidity, trough governments and central banks, will not drive the system out of stagnation because profits are too low and outstanding debt is too high for banks to extend credit and corporations to invest. Furthermore, major restructuring involving real wage reductions, mergers and acquisitions of corporations and banks, includes the impairment of the weaker capital which will take a long undefined period of time with persistent high unemployment. Direct state investment, on the other hand, will reduce unemployment and create adequate demand to eventually drive the economy out of stagnation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Why recession and depression policies differ|
|English Title:||Why Recession and Depression Policies Differ|
|Keywords:||profitability, capital accumulation, profit of enterprise, depression|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B14 - Socialist ; Marxist
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B22 - Macroeconomics
|Depositing User:||Nikos Stravelakis|
|Date Deposited:||30. May 2012 15:30|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 12:43|
Aris Papageorgiou* and Lefteris Tsoulfidis* «:Kondratiev, Marx and the Long Cycle»
Luxemburg, R. (1951) The Accumulation of Capital(Routledge Kegan Paul, London, 1951)
Bernstein, E. (1899) Die Voraussetzungen des Socializmus (Stuttgart, 1899). [English translation:The preconditions of socialism Cambridge, 1993].
Grossman H. Law of Accumulation and Breakdown ,Pluto publications 1929
Bauer, Otto (1913) ‘Die akkumulation des kapitals’, Neue Zeit. 31 (1913) I. [English translation: ‘Accumulation of Capital’ History of Political Economy, 18.1, 1986, pp 87-111 tr. King, J.E] .
Dobb, M. 1959. The falling rate of profit, Science and Society.
Mandel E. «Long Waves in Capitalist Development» Cambridge University Press 1980
Shaikh A. The Falling Rate of Profit as the Cause of Long Waves: Theory and Empirical Evidence in New Findings in Long Wave Research, Alfred Kleinknecht, Ernest Mandel, and Immanuel Wallerstein (eds.), Macmillan Press, London
Fred Moseley :CAPITAL IN GENERAL AND COMPETITION IN VOLUME 3 OF CAPITAL: THE QUANTITATIVE DIMENSION
Shaikh A. Accumulation, Finance, and Effective Demand in Marx, Keynes, and Kalecki in Financial Dynamics and Business Cycles: New Prospects, Willi Semmler, (ed.), M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York (1989).
Dumenil, G. 1977. Marx el Keynes Face a la crise. Paris: Economica.
Folley D 1984. "Money, Accumulation, and Crises." Mimeo
Shaikh A. Explaining Inflation and Unemployment: An Alternative to Neoliberal Economic Theory in Contemporary Economic Theory, Andriana Vachlou (ed.), Macmillan, London
Moudoud J and Shaikh A. «Measuring Capacity Utilization in OECD Countries: A Cointegration Method» The Levy Institute of Bard college Working Paper No. 415 2004.
Goodwin R. «A Growth Cycle», 1967, in Feinstein, editor, Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth
Asimakopulos, A. 1983. "Kalecki and Keynes on Finance, Investment, and Saving."Cambridge Journal of Economics 37(Sept./Dec.)
Marx K The Capital VIII International Publishers, NY, [n.d.]First Published: 1894; On-Line Version: Marx.org 1996, Marxists.org 1999
Feigenbaum MJ The metric universal properties of period doubling bifurcations and the spectrum for a route to turbulence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1980;357:330- 336
Brigs « Feigenbaum Scaling in Discrete Dynamical Systems» Phd Dissertation Department of Mathematics University of Melbourne JAN 2001.
B.Mandelbrot and R,Hudson «The ( Mis) Behavior of Markets»
Shaikh A. «The First Great Depression of the 21st Century» Socialist Register, 2011
Ochoa E.«An Input Output Study of Labor Productivity in the U.S. Economy, 1947 1972.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 19, no. 1 (1986)
May R. “Biological Populations Obeying Difference Equations : Stable Points, Stable Cycles, and Chaos» Journal of theor. Biology (1975) 51, 511-524
Pain Without Gain» By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: February 19, 2012 New York Times
Marx K. "Theories of Surplus Value" On-Line Version: Marx.org 1996, Marxists.org 1999