Dealing with small samples and dimensionality issues in data envelopment analysis

Zervopoulos, Panagiotis (2012): Dealing with small samples and dimensionality issues in data envelopment analysis.

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely applied nonparametric method for comparative evaluation of firms’ efficiency. A deficiency of DEA is that the efficiency scores assigned to each firm are sensitive to sampling variations, particularly when small samples are used. In addition, an upward bias is present due to dimensionality issues when the sample size is limited compared to the number of inputs and output. As a result, in case of small samples, DEA efficiency scores cannot be considered as reliable measures. The DEA Bootstrap addresses this limitation of the DEA method as it provides the efficiency scores with stochastic properties. However, the DEA Bootstrap is still inappropriate in the presence of small samples. In this context, we introduce a new method that draws on random data generation procedures, unlike Bootstrap which is based on resampling, and Monte Carlo simulations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Data generation process; Random data; Bootstrap; Bias correction; Efficiency
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

References

Banker RD (1993) Maximum-Likelihood, Consistency and Data Envelopment Analysis - a Statistical Foundation. Manage Sci 39 (10):1265-1273

Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2 (6):429-444

Chernick MR (2008) Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey Coelli T, Rao P, O'Donnell CJ, Battese G (2005) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer, New York

Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software. 2nd edn. Springer Science + Business Media, New York

Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods; another look at the jacknife. Annals of Statistics 7:1-26

Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1998) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

Perelman S, Santin D (2009) How to generate regularly behaved production data? A Monte Carlo experimentation of DEA scale efficiency measurement. Eur J Oper Res 19:303-310

Sherman HD, Zhu J (2006) Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: Evidence from a US bank application. Ann Oper Res 145:301-319.

Silverman BW (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London

Simar L (2007) How to improve the performances of DEA/FDH estimators in the presence of noise? J Prod Anal 28:183-201

Simar L, Wilson PW (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage Sci 44 (1):49-61

Smith P (1997) Model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis. Ann Oper Res 73:233-252

Staat M (2001) The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency in DEA: Comment. J Prod Anal 15:129-137

Zhang Y, Bartels R (1998) The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency in DEA with an applicatino to electricity distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand. J Prod nal 9:187-204