De Prato, Giuditta and Nepelski, Daniel (2012): A framework for assessing innovation collaboration partners and its application to India.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_39284.pdf Download (285kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We develop a framework for assessing innovation collaboration partners. Based on the evidence from existing empirical studies, we identify four elements relevant as drivers of innovation collaboration. These elements include inventive capacity, technological specialization patterns, openness to international innovation collaboration and economic potential of technology. In order to make the framework operational, we propose a set of patent-based indicators that capture the relevant elements. In a second step, we apply the framework to analyse the attractiveness of India as a partner for innovation collaboration. Except for mapping India’s technological specialization patterns evolution, we show that it is a country very open to international collaboration. Moreover, as a lion’s share of India’s inventions is patented outside of the country, it can be expected that the technology developed in India has supranational commercial potential.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A framework for assessing innovation collaboration partners and its application to India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | collaborative innovation, science and technology collaboration, globalisation of technology, patent analysis, India |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology |
Item ID: | 39284 |
Depositing User: | Daniel Nepelski |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jun 2012 16:29 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 07:33 |
References: | Abraham, B. P., & Moitra, S. D. (2001). Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 21(4), 245-252. Archibugi, D., & Iammarino, S. (2002). The globalization of technological innovation: definition and evidence. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 98-122. Archibugi, D., & Planta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-519. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Managing innovation in the transnational corporation. In C. Bartlett, Y. Doz & G. Hedlund (Eds.), Managing the Global Firm: London, Routledge. Bergek, A., & Bruzelius, M. (2010). Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB. Research Policy, 39(10), 1321-1334. Bosworth, D. L. (1984). Foreign patent flows to and from the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 13(2), 115-124. Bruche, G. (2012). Emerging Indian pharma multinationals: latecomer catch-up strategies in a globalised high-tech industry. European J. of International Management, 6, 300 - 322. Chen, Y.-Y., Farris, G., & Chen, Y.-H. (2011). Effects of technology cycles on strategic alliances. International Journal of Technology Management, 53, 121 - 148. De Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2011a). Global R&D network. Network analysis of international R&D centres. Seville, Spain: JRC-IPTS. De Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2011b). Patent data analysis to support policy making. Assessing S&T cooperation partners: the case of India & China, 3rd IPTS Workshop The Output of R&D Activities: Harnessing the Power of Patents Data. JRC-IPTS, Sevilla. De Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2012). Global technological collaboration network. Network analysis of international co-inventions. Forthcoming in the Jorunal of Technology Transfer. De Prato, G., Nepelski, D., & Stancik, J. (2011). Internationalisation of ICT R&D: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission. de Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011). A corrected count of priority filings. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research Working Paper, forthcoming. Doz, Y. L., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy: Harvard Business Press. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31. Dunning, J. H. (1994). Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, 23(1), 67-88. Ernst, D. (2005). Pathways to innovation in Asia's leading electronics-exporting countries – a framework for exploring drivers and policy implications. International Journal of Technology Management, 29, 6 - 20. Grefermann, K., & Röthlingshöfer, K. (1974). Patentwesen und technischer Fortschritt: kritische Würdigung der Zusammenhänge in ausgewählten Branchen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland anhand empirischer Untersuchungen. Munich: IFO-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. Grevesen, C., & Damanpour, F. (2007). The Internationalization of R&D and Innovative Performance in Multinational Enterprises. International Journal of Technology Management, 38, 113-137. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661-1707. Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30(8), 1253-1266. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363. Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). An exploration into regional variation in innovative activity in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 21, 114-129. Malik, P. (2012). Information and communication technologies industry in emerging India. In G. De Prato, D. Nepelski & J.-P. Simon (Eds.), Dancing with the tigers: Asia in the global ICT innovation network: Chandos Publishing. Mazumdar, S. (2010). Industry and services in growth and structural change in India: some unexplored features: University Library of Munich, Germany. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2-4), 143-155. Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. (1999). Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation, 19(5), 283-294. OECD. (2008). Compendium of Patent Statistics. Paris: OECD. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2), 141-156. Picci, L. (2010). The internationalization of inventive activity: A gravity model using patent data. Research Policy, 39(8), 1070-1081. Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes - validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 939-957. Sachwald, F. (2008). Location choices within global innovation networks: the case of Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 364-378. Santamaria, L., & Surroca, J. (2011). Matching the Goals and Impacts of R&D Collaboration. European Management Review, 8(2), 95-109. Simon, J.-P. (2011). The ICT Landscape in BRICS Countries: Brazil, India, China: JRC-IPTS. Smith, K. (2005). Measuring Innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Turlea, G., Nepelski, D., De Prato, G., Simon, J.-P., Sabadash, A., Stancik, J., et al. (2011). The 2011 report on R&D in ICT in the European Union: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission. UNESCO. (2010). Science Report 2010: UNESCO. WIPO. (2010). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2010. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39284 |