Kuloglu, Ayhan and Lobont, Oana-Ramona and Topcu, Mert (2012): A question of causality between political corruption, economic freedom and economic growth in Europe. Published in: Crisis Aftermath: Economic policy changes in the EU and its Member States, Conference Proceedings, Szeged, University of Szeged , Vol. ISBN 9, (2012): pp. 412-425.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_40365.pdf Download (656kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Economic, cultural, social, psychological, political, administrative and religious effects of corruption are manifested by functional, political and moral degradation of local public authorities, which is a result of the expansion of political corruption, by reducing the transparent and accountable political power or by social tensions and increasing impoverishment of the population.
In the executive activity, corruption has an effect on the reduced quality of public administration, the existence of an informal decision-making system and close links between organized crime, corrupt officials and politicians. Thus, outwardly effects of corruption, even in international relations, is manifested by the conduct of incompetent, irresponsible, provocative and subjective – conventional behavior of persons in positions of responsibility which, in dealing with foreign partners, primarily promotes personal and corporate interests against national interests, which, inevitably undermines the country's image and credibility as a partner in international relations.
This paper tries to show a more accurate picture of the extent of corruption in Europe, through individual analysis of indicators measuring corruption and by quantifying the relation between corruption and political, administrative and economic determinants factors, through a regressive “pool data” model. For a fine approximation of the decision-making mechanism, in accordance with the policies they generate, there is a necessity the knowledge and understanding of how the political elements are transformed into real elements to measure their incidence. This paper adds to the empirical literature on the relationship between corruption and economic growth by incorporating the impact of economic freedom.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A question of causality between political corruption, economic freedom and economic growth in Europe |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Political corruption; economic freedom; economic growth |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook |
Item ID: | 40365 |
Depositing User: | Beata Farkas |
Date Deposited: | 06 Aug 2012 14:12 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:16 |
References: | Adkins, L.C. – Moomaw, R. S. – Savvides A. (2002): Institutions, Freedom, and Technical Efficiency. Southern Economic Journal, 69, 1, pp. 92-108. Aidt, T. – Dutta, J. – Vania, S. (2008): Governance regimes, corruption and growth: theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 2, pp. 195-220. Ali, A. – Crain, W.M. (2002): Institutional Distortions, Economic Freedom and Growth. Cato Journal, 21, 3, pp. 415-426. Aliyu, S. U. R. – Elijah, A. O. (2009): Corruption and Economic Growth in Nigeria: 1986-2007. MPRA Paper No. 12504. Ayal, E. B. – Karras, G. (1998): Components of economic freedom and growth: An Empirical Study. Journal of Developing Areas, 32, 3, pp. 327-338. Billger, S. M. – Goel, R. K. (2009): Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling cor-ruption? Cross-country quantile regression estimates. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 2, pp. 299-305. Blackburn, K. – Forgues-Puccio, G. (2007): Why is corruption less harmful in some countries than in others? Discussion Paper Series, Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research, Economic Studies. University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK, no 088. Carlsson, F. – Lundstrom, S. (2001): Economic freedom and growth: decomposing the effects. Working Paper in Economics no. 33, available on line http://swopec.hhs.se/gunwpe/papers/gunwpe0033.pdf Cebula, R.J. (2011): Economic Growth, Ten Forms of Economic Freedom, and Political Stability: An Empirical Study Using Panel Data, 2003–2007. Journal of Private Enterprise, 26, 2, pp. 61-81. Dawson, J.W. (2003): Causality in the Freedom-Growth Relationship. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 3, pp. 479-495. De Haan, J. – Sturm, J. (2000): On the Relationship between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 2, pp. 215-241. Farr, K. W. – Lord R. A. – Wolfenbarger J. L. (1998): Economic Freedom, Political Freedom and Economic Well-Being: A Causality Analysis. Cato Journal, 18, 2, pp. 247-262. Goldsmith, A.A. (1995): Democracy, Property Rights and Economic Growth. Journal of Development Studies, 32, 2, pp. 157-174. Graeff, P. – Mehlkop, G. (2003): The Impacts of Economic Freedom on Corruption: Different Patterns for Rich and Poor Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, pp. 605-620. Gwartney, J. – Holcombe R. – Lawson, R.A. (2006): Institutions and the Impact of Investment on Growth. Kyklos, 59, 2, pp. 255-273. Gwartney, J. – Lawson, R.A. – Hall J. (2011): Economic Freedom of the World: 2011 Annual Report. Hanke, S. – Walters, S. (1997): Economic Freedom, Prosperity, and Equality: A Survey. Cato Journal, 17, 3, pp. 117-146. Hanson, J. R. (2000): Prosperity and Economic Freedom. A Virtuous Cycle. The Independent Review, 4, 4. (available on line http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_04_4_hanson.pdf) Haque, M. E. – Kneller R. (2005): Corruption Clubs: Endogenous Thresholds in Corruption and Development. Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research, Economic Studies. University of Manchester. M13 9PL, UK. Heckelman, J.C. (2000): Economic Freedom and Economic Growth: A Short-Run Causal Relationship. Journal of Applied Economics, 3, 1, pp. 71-91. Heckelman, J.C. – Stroup, M.D. (2002), Which Economic Freedoms Contribute to Economic Growth? Replay. Kyklos, 55, 3, pp. 417-420. Islam, N. (1995): Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 4, pp. 1127-1170. Jong-Sung, Y. – Khagram, S. (2005): A Comparative Study of Inequality and Corruption. American Sociological Review, 70, pp. 136-157. Lanyi, A. – Azfar, O. (2005): Tools for Assessing Corruption and Integrity in Institutions: A Handbook. United States Agency for International Development, United States Government of America (Available on line at http://www.irisprojects.umd.edu/anticorruption/Files/IRIS_Assessment_Handbook.pdf) Leschke, M. (2000): Constitutional Choice and Prosperity: A Factor Analysis. Constitutional Political Economy, 11, 3, pp. 265-279. Mahmood, K. – Azid, T. – Chaudhry, I.S. – Faridi, M.Z. (2010): Impact of Economic Freedom on Economic Growth: The Case of Some Selected SAARC Member Countries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 52. Mauro, P. (1995): Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 3, pp. 681-712. Méndez, F. – Sepúlveda, F. (2006): Corruption, growth and political regimes: Cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 1, pp. 82-98. Méon, P. G. – Sekkat, K. (2005): Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122, pp. 69-97. Méon, P. G. – Sekkat, K. (2007): Revisiting the relationship between governance and foreign di-rect investment. Brussels Economic Review, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 50, 1, pp. 41-61. Pitlik, H. (2002): The Path of Liberalization and Economic Growth. Kyklos, 55, 1, pp. 57-80. Rahman, A. – Kisunko G. – Kapoor, K. (1999): Estimating the Effects of Corruption Implications for Bangladesh. Background paper for a World Bank Report “Corruption in Bangladesh: Costs and Cures”, World Bank, Washington D.C. Rohwer, A. (2009): Measuring Corruption: A Comparison between the Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index and the World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators. CESifo DICE Report, 7, 3, pp. 42-52. (Available on line at http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/1192926.PDF) Swaleheen, M. – Stansel, D. (2007): Economic freedom, corruption, and growth. The Cato Journal, 27, 3, pp. 343-358. U4 – Anti-Corruption Resource Center (2009): Glossary. (Available on line at http://www.u4.no/document/glossary.cfm) Ugur, M. – Nandini, D. (2011 a): Corruption and economic growth: A meta-analysis of the evidence on low-income countries and beyond. MPRA Paper 31226, University Library of Munich, Germany. Ugur, M. – Nandini, D. (2011 b): Evidence on the economic growth impacts of corruption in low-income countries and beyond. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. University of London. UNDP (2008): A Users’ Guide to Measuring Corruption. (available on line at http://www.globalintegrity.org/toolkits/books.cfm) Vega-Gordillo, M. – Álvarez-Arce, J. L. (2003): Economic Growth and Freedom: A Causality Study. The Cato Journal, 23, 2, pp. 199-215. Weede, E. – Kämpf S. (2002): The Impact of Intelligence and Institutional Improvements on Economic Growth. Kyklos, 55, 3, pp. 361-380. World Bank (WB) Database, World Government Indicators (WGI). (Available on line at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/mc_countries.asp) |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/40365 |