Marchini, Andrea and Diotallevi, Francesco (2010): Methods and instruments for value perceptions. The conjoint analysis applied to the wine packaging. Published in: Proceedings of Advances in Business-Related Scientific Research Conference 2010 No. ISBN: 9789619291702
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_40637.pdf Download (63kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This work tries to provide a path to describe the modern marketing research and, at the same time, it tries to examine carefully in which context, a firm can be supported by marketing strategies focused to the consumers. Between different methods examined, the Conjoint analysis has resulted the most effective. It shows an precise description of the consumer perception and behaviour. This method has been chosen to evaluate how the features of a wine packaging can influence consumer purchasing. The research has shown that the label is the most important variable, which can prevalently influence the consumer product perception.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Methods and instruments for value perceptions. The conjoint analysis applied to the wine packaging. |
English Title: | Methods and instruments for value perceptions. The conjoint analysis applied to the wine packaging. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Marketing research, Conjoint analysis, Consumer behaviour |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing ; Cooperatives ; Agribusiness |
Item ID: | 40637 |
Depositing User: | Francesco Diotallevi |
Date Deposited: | 20 Dec 2012 12:05 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 13:28 |
References: | Baarsma B.E., (2003), “The valuation of the IJmeer Nature Reserve using Conjoint analysis”, Environmental and resource economics, 2003, vol. 25, n. 3. Bloch P.H., (1995), “Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response”, Journal of marketing, vol. 59, n. 3. Danaher P.J., (1997), “Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys”, Journal of retailing, vol. 73, n. 2. Lambin J.J., (2000), “Marketing strategico e operative”, McGraw-Hill, Ney York. Lancaster K., (1966), A new approach to consumer theory”, Journal of political economy, n. 74. Mazzanti M., Montini A., (2001), “Tecniche di valutazione multi-attributo ed esperimenti di scelta: un'analisi critica degli aspetti metodologici”, Rivista di Economia Agraria, LVI, n.2 Moore W. L., Louviere J., Verma R., (1999), “Using conjoint analysis to help design product platform”, The journal of product innovation management, 1999 , vol. 16, n. 1. Stefani G., Sutera L., (2001), “Costi di transazione e differenziali di potere nella scelta del canale di commercializzazione: un'applicazione della Conjoint analysis”, Rivista di Economia Agraria, LVI, n.2. Sungbin C., (2003), “Exploring artificial intelligence-based data fusion for Conjoint analysis”, Expert systems with applications, n.24. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/40637 |