Logo
Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Orphan versus non-orphan IPOs: the difference analyst coverage makes

Boissin, Romain (2012): Orphan versus non-orphan IPOs: the difference analyst coverage makes. Forthcoming in:

[img]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_41584.pdf

Download (103kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of the importance of analyst coverage for the long-run returns of IPO firms over the period from 1991 to 2010. In US IPOs, during the one- to five-year horizon, we find a significant long-run abnormal performance by orphans (IPOs without analyst coverage) compared to non-orphans (IPOs with analyst coverage.Further analysis reveals that this outperformance by non-orphans stems from high analyst coverage. Our results are robust after accounting for venture capital backing, underwriting syndicates, underpricing, institutional investor ownership, or operating performance variables.

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact us: mpra@ub.uni-muenchen.de

This repository has been built using EPrints software.

MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by Logo of the University Library LMU Munich.