Lee, Frederic and Pham, Xuan and Gu, Gyun (2012): The UK research assessment exercise and the narrowing of UK economics.
Download (492kB) | Preview
The aim of this paper is to delineate an empirically grounded, structure-causal going concern recursive model of UK economics that, in the context of the RAE and local department decision-making, explains the progressive elimination of heterodox economics, the progressive homogenization of mainstream economics from 1992 to the present, and the continued rise to dominance of a select group of departments, and indicates whether these ‘regularities’ will continue under the Research Excellence Framework selectivity exercise in 2014.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The UK research assessment exercise and the narrowing of UK economics|
|Keywords:||UK Economics, Research Assessment Exercise, Critical Realism|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists
|Depositing User:||Frederic Lee|
|Date Deposited:||09. Oct 2012 20:08|
|Last Modified:||24. Aug 2015 00:30|
Alberti, M. 2012. Mainstream Economists on the Defensive, Remapping Debate, available at http://www.remappingdebate.org/article/mainstream-economists-defensive.
Beath, J. 2002. RAE Rankings and Top Journals: John Beath comments, Royal Economic Society Newsletter, issue no. 119, 6.
Bence, V. and Oppenheim, C. 2005. The Evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: publications, performance and perceptions, Journal of Educational Administration and History, vol. 37, no. 2, 137-55.
Conference of Heads of University Departments of Economics (CHUDE). 2003 -10. Minutes, available at: http://www.res.org.uk/view/chudeMinutes.html.
Da Silva, S. 2009. Going Parochial in the Assessment of the Brazilian Economics Research Output, Economic Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 4, 2826-846, available at: http://works.bepress.com/sergiodasilva/88/.
Diamond, A. 1989. The Core Journals of Economics, Current Contents, vol. 21, 4-11.
ESRC. 2008. International Benchmarking Review of UK Economics, available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Int_benchmarking_economics_tcm8-4552.pdf.
Freeman, A. 2006. Submission from the Association for Heterodox Economics to the consultation on the QAA Benchmark Statement on Economics, available at:
Freeman, A. 2008. Submission from the Association for Heterodox Economics to the International Benchmarking Review on Research Assessment, available at:
Freeman, A. 2011. Submission from the Association for Heterodox Economics to the Science and Technology Committee Enquiry into Peer Review, available at:
Gillies, D. 2012. Economics and Research Assessment Systems, Economic Thought, 1, 23-47, available at: http://etdiscussion.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?post=economics-and-research-assessment-systems.
Gomez-Suarez, A. 2007. Perpetrator Blocs, Genocidal Mentalities and Geographies: the destruction of the Union Patriotica in Columbia and its Lessons for Genocide Studies, Journal of Genocide Research, vol. 9, no. 4: 637-60.
Gordge, E. 2010. Personal communication. 28 September. In possession of the author.
Halkos, G. E. and Tzeremes, N. G. 2011. Measuring Economic Journals’ Citation Efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach, Scientometrics, vol. 88, no. 3, 979-1001.
Harley, S. and Lee, F. S. 1997. Research Selectivity, Managerialism, and the Academic Labor Process: the future of nonmainstream economics in U.K. universities, Human Relations, vol. 50, no. 11, 1427–60.
Jacobs, S. L. 2005. Language Death and Revival after Cultural Destruction: reflections on a little discussed aspect of genocide, Journal of Genocide Research, vol. 7, no. 3: 423-30.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., and Stengos, T. 2011. An Update Ranking of Academic Journals in Economics, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 44, no. 4, 1525-38.
Kogan, M. and Hanney, S. 2000. Reforming Higher Education, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Lee, F. S. 2006. The Ranking Game, Class, and Scholarship in American Mainstream Economics, Australasian Journal of Economics Education, vol. 3, nos. 1-2, 1-41.
Lee, F. S. 2007. The Research Assessment Exercise, the State and the Dominance of Mainstream Economics in British Universities, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 31, no. 2, 309-25.
Lee, F. S. 2009A. A History of Heterodox Economics: challenging the mainstream in the twentieth century, London: Routledge.
Lee, F. S. 2009B. A History of Heterodox Economics: challenging the mainstream in the twentieth century—appendix, http://cas.umkc.edu/economics/people/facultyPages/lee/default.asp.
Lee, F. S. and Harley, S. 1998. Peer Review, the Research Assessment Exercise and the Demise of Non-Mainstream Economics, Capital and Class, no. 66, 23–51.
Levy, G. 2006. Considerations on the Connections Between Race, Politics, Economics, and Genocide, Journal of Genocide Research, vol. 8, no. 2, 137-48.
Martin, B. and Whitley, R. 2010. The UK Research Assessment Exercise: a case of regulatory capture?, in R. Whitley, J. Glaser, and L. Engwell (eds), Reconfiguring Knowledge Production: Changing Authority Relationships in the Sciences and their Consequences for Intellectual Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Neary, P. 2011. Personal communication. 3 May. In possession of the author.
Nedeva, M., Boden, R., and Nugroho, Y. 2012. Rank and File: managing individual performance in university research, Higher Education Policy, vol. 25, 335-60.
Portes, R. 2008. The Annual Report of the Secretary-General, Royal Economic Society Newsletter, issue no. 141, 3-5.
Powell, C. 2011. Barbaric Civilization: a critical sociology of genocide, Montreal, McGill- Queen’s University Press.
Research Excellence Framework. 2010. Units of Assessment and Recruitment of Expert Panels, REF 01/2010, available at: http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/unitsofassessmentandrecruitmentofexpertpanels/01_10.pdf.
Research Excellence Framework. 2012. Panel Criteria and Working Methods, REF 01/2012, available at: http://www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/2012-01.
Ritzberger, K. 2008. A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields, German Economic Review, vol. 9, no. 4, 402-30.
Schneider, F. and Ursprung, H. W. 2008. The 2008 GEA Journal-Ranking for the Economics Profession, German Economic Review, vol. 9, no. 4, 532-38.
Tapper, T. and Salter, B. 2003. Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: the case of the Research Assessment Exercise, Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 1, 4-23.
Whitley, R. 2007. Changing Governance of the Public Sciences: the consequences of establishing research evaluation systems for knowledge production in different countries and scientific fields’, in Whitley, R. and Glaser, J. (eds), The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems, Dordrecht, Springer.
Williams, B. 1993. Research Management for Selectivity and Concentration – With What Effect?, Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 1, 4-16.