Macroeconomic aspects of the grey economy - the case of Macedonia

Nenovski, Tome (2012): Macroeconomic aspects of the grey economy - the case of Macedonia.

Abstract

Compared regionally, Republic of Macedonia has one of the highest levels of grey economy activity. According to some estimations, it accounts for about 40% of GDP. This high level of grey economy has a direct influence to the main economic indicators, categories and instruments for macroeconomic regulation: GDP value cannot be precisely measured, there are problems in formulating and realization of macroeconomic policy instruments (fiscal policy, monetary policy, social policy, foreign-trade policy), etc. Because of its high value, grey economy is challenging and serious danger for macroeconomic planning and regulation. By using qualitative, descriptive, statistic and comparative methodologies, this research attempts to locate causes, consequences and the scope of grey economy in Republic of Macedonia. It also presents different ways for measurement of the size of grey economy in the Republic of Macedonia and understands the basic characteristics of the Macedonian case in order to present well‐grounded policy recommendations. The main finding (conclusion) of the paper is the fact that the grey economy in The Republic of Macedonia is a multifaceted phenomenon and the most efficient manner to remove the causes for the occurrence and presence of the grey economy is the improvement of the institutional frame in the country. There is a need for directly focused Government measures that would precipitate the integration of the grey economy in the formal sector, once the right conditions are put in place. The recommendations that this paper promotes will head exactly in that direction. The main recommendation is directed towards activities and measures of the authorities for preventing and removing the reasons of grey economy appearance and punishment of the consequences of this national economy “evil”. Another recommendation is for the Government to increase the speed for redefining (changing) its role on the market. Although there are noticeable signs that the situation has been changing, there is a need for widening the awareness of all business players for the necessity of playing by the rules as well as for enforcing the institutional framework, legal order, moral values and the motivators of the country’s functional economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: macroeconomics; grey economy; informal economy; formal economy; tax evasion
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook

References

1. Ahmad Nadim, Statistics Directorate, OECD, Measuring the non-observed economy in Western Balkan Countries – Practical lessons for transition economies, 2007;

2. “Biznis”, Local Macedonian Daily News, December 26, 2007;

3. Bogov Dimitar, Hidden economy in F.Y.R. of Macedonia and its treatment in the statistical office, Statistical Office of Republic of Macedonia, 2002;

4. Frey S. Bruno S., Schneider Friedrich, Informal and Underground Economy, International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Science, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, 2000;

5. Ivan-Ungureanu Clementina, Non observed economy in Romania, National Institut of Statistics and Economic Studies;

6. Lemieux Pierre: The Underground Economy (Causes, Extent, Approaches), Montreal Economic Institute Research Papers - Department of Management Sciences, Nov. 2007;

7. Lippert Owen, Walker Michael, The Underground Economy: Global Evidence of its Size and Impact, The Fraiser Institute, Vancuver, Canada, 1997;

8. National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia, www.nbrm.mk;

9. Nenovski Tome, Economic Mirror, Nam, Skopje, 2002;

10. Nenovski Tome, Economic clearing up, NAMpress, 2008; 11. Nenovski Tome, Macroeconomics, University American College Skopje, 2010;

12. Ogubc Fethi, Yilmaz Gokhan, Estimating the underground economy in Turkey, The Central bank of the Republic of Turkey, sept. 2000;

13. Organization for economic co-operation and development, Framework for the measurement of unrecorded economic activities in transition economies, Paris, 1997;

14. Ott Katarina, The Underground Economy in Croatia, Institute of Public Finance, 2002, Zagreb, Republic of Croatia;

15. Republic of Macedonia – State Statistical Office, Methods for reaching complete exhaustiveness of the Macedonian GDP, Skopje, 2002;

16. Sennholz F. Hans, The Underground Economy, The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2003;

17. United Nations economic commission for Europe, Non-observed economy in national accounts (Survey of national practices), United Nations, Geneva, 2003;