دراسة قياسية لسوق العمل فى مصر بإستخدام نموذج التوازن العام

Khalifa, Ali Abd Elaal and El-Batran, Mohsen Mahmoud and Atta, Sahra Khaleel and Shehata, Emad Abd Elmessih (2003): دراسة قياسية لسوق العمل فى مصر بإستخدام نموذج التوازن العام. Published in: The Egyptian Society of Agricultural Economics , Vol. 1, No. 11 (24 September 2003): pp. 1-24.

Abstract

Human labor input is considered the essential core in arising and increasing gross national product, so the equilibrium between supply and demand for labor, is one of the pivots of Egyptian strategy, the overcoming unemployment is the challenging for economic reform in Egypt, by creation productive true employment in all fields. There are many problems hinder motivation the economic development, so the main research problem of the study, can be summarized in the effectiveness of economic reform policies, in the shade of fiscal and monetary policies tools that affect the equilibrium of the structure of labor market. The objective of the study is to explore the effect and role of the economic variables on the behavior and equilibrium of the economic sectors relations through the general equilibrium model. To achieve the objective of the study, the dynamic Liverpool model, that is considered one of the general equilibrium models was estimated, by simultaneous equations system, according to Jerry Hausman method of non linear full information maximum likelihood (NL-FIML). The Liverpool model consists of 28 behavioral equations, and 9 identitiy equations, and included 34 endogenous variables, 28 lagged endogenous variables, and 16 exogenous variables. The study detected and remedied the econometric problems, i.e., autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, non normality of the random error term, and multicollinearity among independents variables, by using Beach-Mackinnon, White’s generalized method of moments, Box-Tidwell, and Marquardt ridge algorithms, for the previous problems respectively. The study used time series data for analysis Liverpool model, that collected from different sources to cover the period (1980-2002), with respect to agriculture, commodities, and services sectors in Egypt. The results of Liverpool model were consistent with the economic theory, it is noticed that the agricultural sector came in the first order according to the effect of the demand for labor in increasing the agricultural domestic product, also the agricultural national product affects increasing the demand for labor, but the agricultural investment didn’t affect, also, there was substitution between technology and the demand for labor. On the other hand, the results showed the effectiveness of the fiscal policy and ineffectiveness of the monetary policy as a result of the inelastic investment with respect to interest rate in all sectors, also increasing taxes led to decreasing the consumption, as an indicator of the effectiveness of fiscal policy. The demand for money with respect to interest rate was inelastic, as an indicator of the effectiveness of monetary policy. Finally, the study recommended applying expanded monetary policy by encouragement investment, especially in the intensive labor projects, also applying expanded fiscal policy by reducing taxation and increasing government expenditure for increasing production, consumption, and employment rates, moreover, the joint among economic plans, education, and training for achieving the equilibrium labor market, and decreasing the quantitative and qualitative unemployment rates in the Egyptian sectors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: An Econometric Study for Labor Market in Egypt by Using the General Equilibrium Model
• Language: Arabic
• Keywords: Liverpool Model, General Equilibrium Model, Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B22 - Macroeconomics

References

Beach, Charles & James G. Mackinnon “A Maximum Likelihood Procedure for Regression with Autocorrelated Errors” Econometrica, Vol. 46, Jan., 1978; 51-58. Box, George & Tidwell P. “Transformation of Independent Variables” Technometrics, Vol. 4, 1962;531-550. Breusch, T. & Adrian Pagan “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Application to Model Specification in Econometrics” Rev. Econ. Stud., Vol. 47, 1980; 239-254. Dixon, P., Parmenter R., Alan A. & Peter J. “Notes and Problems in Applied General Equilibrium Economics” North-Holland Publishing Company, Netherlands, 1992. Edgmand, Michael “Macro Economics: Theory and Policy” 2nd ed, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1983. Engle, Robert “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of Variance of United Kingdom Inflation”Econometrica,Vol.50 ,July ,1982;987-1007. Greene, William “Econometric Analysis” 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 2003. Harris, Richard “Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Small Open Economies with Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition” Am. Econ. Rev., Vol. 74, 1984; 1016-1032. Hausman, Jerry “An Instrumental Variable Approach to Full-Information Estimator for Linear and Certain Nonlinear Econometric Models” Econometrica, Vol. 43, No. 4, July, 1975; 727-738. Jarque, C. & Bera A. “A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals” Inter. Stat. Rev., Vol. 55, 1987; 163-172. Marquardt, D. & Snee R. “Ridge Regression in Practice” Am. Stat., Vol. 29, No. 1, 1975; 3-20. Minford, A., Marwaha K. & Sprague A. “The LiverpooL Macroeconomic Model of the United Kingdom” Economic Modelling, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1984; 24-63. Nerlove, Marc & William Addison “Statistical Estimation of Long-Run Elasticities of Supply and Demand” J. Farm Econ., Vol. 40, No. 4, Nov., 1958; 861-880. Sadoulet, Elisabeth & Alain Dejanvry “Agricultural Trade Liberalization and the Low Income Countries: A General Equilibrium-Multimarket Approach” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 74, No. 1, Feb., 1992; 268-280. Sapsford, David & Tzannatos Zafiris “The Economics of Labour Market” Macmillan Publishing Company Co. Press Ltd., UK, 1993. Scharf, W. “K-Matrix Class Estimators and the Full Information Maximum-Likelihood Estimator as a Special Case” J. Econometrics, Vol. 4, 1976; 41-50. White, Halbert “A Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heteroskedasticity” Econometrica,Vol.48,July,1980; 817-838.