Pisani, Elena and Franceschetti, Giorgio (2011): Territorial approaches for rural development in Latin America: a case study in Chile. Published in: REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO , Vol. 1, No. 43 (2011): pp. 201-218.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_42807.pdf Download (569kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A recent transition in the field of agrarian economics theory for rural development is the move from a narrow agricultural sector approach, to one which adopts broader territorial vision. This passage seeks to interpret interactions between urban and rural worlds in a more comprehensive manner.This relatively new theoretical perspective is of particular interest to academics and politicians in Latin American countries where, since the mid 1990s, the concept of new rurality has been seen as the source of a new approach to rural development. Therefore the theoretical purpose of this research is to clarify the analytical signposts of the new rurality theme in Latin America and to identify the differences between sectoral and territorial approaches considering the socio-economic, institutional and environmental aspects involved. The transition from sectoral to territorial approaches also means, from an operative point of view, the recognition of homogeneous areas for the suggestion of rural development strategies. The operative purpose of this research consists in proposing a methodology to identify these areas with an application in the Maule Region in Chile. The conclusion underlines some critical elements that should be considered in the definition of territorial rural development strategies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Territorial approaches for rural development in Latin America: a case study in Chile |
English Title: | Territorial approaches for rural development in Latin America: a case study in Chile |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | sectoral and territorial approaches, rural development policy, new rurality, Latin America, Chile, cluster analysis |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure N - Economic History > N9 - Regional and Urban History R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries > N56 - Latin America ; Caribbean |
Item ID: | 42807 |
Depositing User: | Elena Pisani |
Date Deposited: | 24 Nov 2012 17:49 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 08:13 |
References: | Baquero, F.S.; Beduschi Filho, L.C; Falconi, C., 2007. Desarrollo Territorial Rural: Analisis de experiencias en Brasil, Chile y Mexico. Santiago, Chile. Oficina Regional de la FAO para América Latina y el Caribe. Barrera, M.A., 2007. Modernidad, Agricultura del conocimiento y nueva ruralidad en Chile. Santiago, Chile. Fundación Chile. Bergman E.; Feser E., 1999. Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications. Regional Research Institute West Virginia University. Morgantown. http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/Bergman-Feser/ website consulted on January 2010. Bresciani, F.; Valdés A., 2007. Beyond food production. The role of agriculture in poverty reduction. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Edward Elgar Publishing. Chiriboga, M., 1999. Cambiar se puede. Experiencias del FEPP en el desarrollo rural del Ecuador. Quito. Imprefepp. Chiriboga, M.; Jara C.J., 2004. Del acceso a la tierra a la producción campesina sostenible: El caso del FEPP en el Ecuador. http://www.landcoalition.org/pdf/odfeppsum.pdf web site consulted on August 2010. Cloke, P., 2006. Conceptualizing rurality. Handbook of Rural Studies. Ed. Cloke, P.; Marsden, T.; Mooney, P.H. London. Sage Publications. Da Veiga, E., 2001. Brasil Rural precisa de uma Estratégia de Desenvolvimento. Série Textos para Discussão n. 1, Convenio FIPE-IICA (MDA-CNDRS/NEAD) Brasília. De Ferranti, D.; Perry, G.E.; Foster, W.; Lederman, D.; Valdés A., 2005. Beyond the City: The Rural Contribution to Development. Washington, DC. World Bank. Douglass, M., 1998. A Regional Network Strategy for Reciprocal Rural-Urban Linkages: An Agenda for Policy Research with Reference to Indonesia. Third World Planning Review. Vol. 20, n. 1: 1–34. Fabbris, L., 1997. Statistica multivariata Analisi esplorativa dei dati. Milano. McGraw Hill. FAO, 2005a. Agricultural Trade and Poverty. Can trade work for the poor? The State of Food and Agriculture. 2005. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, 2005b. Trends and Challenges in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile. FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean in Cooperation with the Agricultural and Development Economics Division. FAO, 2003. La Nueva Ruralidad en Europa y su Interés para América Latina. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, 1995. Agricultural Trade: Entering a new Era? The State of Food and Agriculture. 1995. FAO Agriculture Series, No. 28. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Favareto, A. 2010. A abordagem territorial do desenvolvimento rural – mudança institucional ou inovação por adição? Estudos Avançados. Vol. 24, n. 68: 299-319. São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Favareto, A., 2009. La nueva ruralidad brasileña. Lo que cambió (y lo que no cambió) en el ámbito rural. In Nueva Sociedad n. 223: 146–63. Gobierno de Chile, 2006. Lineamientos programáticos de la política agroalimentaria y forestal chilena.Santiago, Chile. Gobierno de Chile, Ministerio de Agricultura. Gobierno de Chile; IICA, 2006. Pequeña Agricultura en Chile. Rasgos socioproductivos, institucionalidad y clasificación territorial para la innovación. Santiago, Chile. Editores Alfredo Apey Guzmán – Alex Barril García. Gobierno de Chile; Chile Emprende, 2005. Guía Metodológica de Desarrollo Territorial. Programa de Desarrollo Económico Territorial Chile Emprende. Santiago, Chile: Gobierno de Chile. Gómez, S.H., 2008. La nueva ruralidad. Qué tan nueva? Revisión de la bibliografía, intento por definir sus límites y propuesta conceptual para investigaciones. Segunda versión ampliada. Universidad Acedemica de Humanismo Cristiano. Grupo de Investigaciones Agrarias. Santiago, Chile. LOM Ediciones. Hirschman, A.O., 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development, Yale University Press, New Haven. Kay, C., 2009. Development strategies and rural development: exploring synergies, eradicating poverty. In Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 36, n.1: 103–37. Kay, C., 2008. Reflections on Latin American Rural Studies in the Neoliberal Globalization Period: A New Rurality? Development and Change. Vol. 39, n. 6: 915–43. Kay, C., 1997. Latin America’s Exclusionary Rural Development in a Neo-Liberal World. Paper presented at the 1997 Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA) Guadalajara, Mexico, April 17–19, 1997. Kilkenny M.; Nalbarte L., 2002. Keystone Sector Identification. In Trade, Networks, Hierarchies, ed. G. J. D. Hewings, M. Sonis, and D. Boyce. Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag. McGilvray, J.W., 1977. Linkages, Key Sectors and Development Strategies. In Structure, Systems and Economic Policy, ed. Leontief. Cambridge University Press. MIDEPLAN, 2009. La situacion de pobreza en Chile. In Serie analisis de resultados de la Encuesta de Caracterizacion Socioeconomica Nacional, No. 1. Santiago, Chile. Gobierno de Chile. ODEPA, 2005. Agricultura Chile 2014. Una perspectiva de mediano plazo, Santiago, Chile. Gobierno de Chile. OECD, 2009. OECD Territorial Reviews. Chile. Paris. OECD Publishing. Perroux, F., 1955. Note sur la notion de pole de croissance. Economie Appliquée 307-20. Pike, A.; Rodríguez-Pose, A.; Tomaney, J. 2007. What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom? Regional Studies. Vol. 41, n.9: 1253–1269. Pisani, E. 2009. Il contributo della ruralità allo sviluppo. Il Cile quale laboratorio applicativo. Milano, Franco Angeli. Pisani, E.; Franceschetti G. 2009. Evolution of the economic agrarian thought: from agribusiness to new rurality. Rev. FCA Cuyo. Vol. XLI, n.2: 85-108. Reardon, T.; Berdegué J.; Escobar, G., 2001. Rural Non Farm Employment and Income in Latin America: Overview and Policy Implications. World Development. Vol. 29, n. 33: 395–409. Schejtman, A.; Berdegué, J., 2003. Desarrollo Territorial Rural. Santiago, Chile. RIMISP. Sepúlveda, S.; Chavarría H.; Rojas P. 2005. Metodología para estimar el nivel de desarrollo sostenible de los territorios rurales (El Biograma). San José, Costa Rica: IICA. Sepúlveda, S.; Rodríguez, A.; Echeverri, R.; Portilla, M., 2003. El Enfoque Territorial Del Desarrollo Rural. San José, Costa Rica. IICA. Tacoli, C, 2004. Rural-Urban Linkages and Pro-Poor Agricultural Growth: An Overview. Prepared for OECD DAC POVNET Agriculture and Pro-Poor Growth Task Team Helsinki Workshop, June 17–18, 2004. Tacoli, C., 1998. Rural-urban interactions: a guide to the literature. Environment and Urbanization. Vol. 10, n. 1: 147–66. UNDP, 2010. Human Development Report 2010 – 20th Anniversary Edition. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/ website consulted on December 2010. Valdés, A.; Foster, W., 2005. Externalidades de la Agricultura Chilena. Santiago, Chile. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. Van der Ploeg, J.D., 2000. Revitalizing Agriculture: Farming Economically as Starting Ground for Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis. Vol. 40, n.4: 498–511. Van der Ploeg, J.D.; J.D., Renting, H.; Brunori, G.; Knickel, K.; Mannion, J.; Marsden, T.; de Roest, K.; Sevilla-Guzmán, E.; Ventura, F., 2000. Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theories. Sociologia Ruralis. Vol. 40, n. 4: 391–408. Ward, N.; Brown, D.L., 2009. Placing the Rural in Regional Development. Regional Studies. Vol. 43, n. 10: 1237–1244. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/42807 |