Marchionni, Mariana and Gluzmann, Pablo (2010): Distributional Incidence of Social, Infrastructure, and Telecommunication Services in Latin America. Published in: Documento de Trabajo - CEDLAS , Vol. 97, (April 2010): pp. 1-57.
Download (1MB) | Preview
This paper performs a distributional incidence analysis to study the patterns describing access to, and expenditures on, basic services (education, health, public transport, water, electricity, gas and telecommunications) in Latin American countries. We find that household expenditures on these services are pro-rich distributed, mainly because poorest households face limited access to services. Also, services with the highest expenditure shares (education, health, and transport) are characterized by moderate to small Kakwani indices, while services with high Kakwani indices (telecommunication and gas) represent a small part of total household consumption, suggesting small distributional effects of potential reforms of services sectors.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Distributional Incidence of Social, Infrastructure, and Telecommunication Services in Latin America|
|English Title:||Distributional Incidence of Social, Infrastructure, and Telecommunication Services in Latin America|
|Keywords:||Distributional Incidence, Social Services, Infrastructure, Telecommunication, Services, Latin America|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being|
|Depositing User:||Pablo Gluzmann|
|Date Deposited:||30. Nov 2012 17:40|
|Last Modified:||28. Feb 2013 19:11|
Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced Econometrics. Hardvard University Press.
Bourguignon, F and Pereira da Silva (eds.) (2003). The impact of economic policies on poverty and income distribution. The World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Card, D. and A. B. Krueger (1992). “Does school quality matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United States.” Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(1), pp. 1-40, February.
CEDLAS (2007). A Guide to SEDLAC. www.depeco.econo.unlp.edu.ar/cedlas/sedlac.
Cont, W., Hancevic, P. And Navajas, F. (2009). “Energy populism and household welfare”, AAEP, November 2009.
Deaton, A. and S. Zaidi (2002). “Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis.” Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper: 135. v. 104, pp. xi, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank
Kingdon, G. (1996). “The quality and efficiency of private and public education: a case study of rural India.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 58(1), pp. 57-82, February.
Komives, K., V. Foster, J. Halpern, and Q. Wodon (2005). Water, Electricity and the Poor. Who Benefits from Utility Subsidies?. The World Bank.
Lambert, P. (2001). The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester University Press.
Marchionni, M., W. Sosa Escudero and J. Alejo (2008). “La incidencia distributiva del acceso, gasto y consumo de los Servicios Públicos.” In Navajas F. (editor), La Tarifa Social en los Sectores de Infraestructura en la Argentina, Buenos Aires: TEMAS.
Van de Walle, D. (2003). “Behavioral incidence analysis of public spending and social programs.” In Bourguignon and Pereira da Silva (eds.), The impact of economic policies on poverty and income distribution. The World Bank and Oxford University Press.