Armstrong, J. Scott and Green, Kesten C. (2012): Effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility policies.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43007.pdf Download (191kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article reviews experimental evidence on the effects of policies intended to promote behavior by firms that is more socially responsible and less socially irresponsible. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can provide firms with opportunities for profit, but changes are likely to increase total welfare only if firms adopt them freely and without taxpayer subsidies. Mandated CSR circumvents people’s own plans and preferences, distorts the allocation of resources, and increases the likelihood of irresponsible decisions. Evidence that government policies will increase welfare and a compelling argument that proven benefits justify reductions in freedom are necessary in order to justify CSR mandates. To date, this has apparently not been achieved. Corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) is concerned with whether firms undertake harmful actions that managers would be unwilling to undertake acting for themselves, or that a reasonable person would expect to cause substantive net harm when all parties are considered. Markets in which stakeholders are free to make decisions in their own interests provide some protection against CSI. Tort and contract law provide additional protection. Nevertheless, managers sometimes act irresponsibly. Codes of ethics that require fair treatment of stakeholders while pursuing long-term profit reduce the risk of irresponsible decisions. Management support and stakeholder accounting are important for successful implementation. Firms may wish to consider these measures; many already have.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility policies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | accountability; affirmative action; decision making; ethics; externalities; free markets; minimum wage; paternalism; principal-agent problem; regulation; seer-sucker theory; stakeholder accounting; stakeholder theory; sustainability |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 43007 |
Depositing User: | Kesten Green |
Date Deposited: | 04 Dec 2012 17:19 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:25 |
References: | Arando, S., Freundlich, F., Gago, M., Jones, D. C., & Kato, T. (2010). Assessing Mondragon: stability and managed change in the face of globalization. William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 1003. [Available from http://wdi.umich.edu/files/publications/workingpapers/wp1003.pdf] Armstrong, J. S. (1977). Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 5, 185–213. Armstrong, J. S. (1980). The seer-sucker theory: The value of experts in forecasting. Technology Review, 83, 16–24. Armstrong, J. S. (2010). Persuasive advertising. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Armstrong, J. S. (2012). Illusions in regression analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 26, 689–694. Arnot, C., Boxall, P. C., & Cash, S. B. (2006). Do ethical consumers care about price? A revealed preference analysis of fair trade coffee purchases. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 555–565. Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., & Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. The American Economic Review, 85, 1337–1343. Baumhart, R. (1968). Ethics in business. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Ben-Shahar, O., & Schneider, C. E. (2010). The failure of mandated disclosure. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 159, 647–749. Bentham, J. (1780, 1823). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon. Brief, A. P., Dukerich, J. M., Brown, P. R., & Brett, J. F. (1996). What’s wrong with the Treadway Commission report? Experimental analyses of the effects of personal values and codes of conduct on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 183–198. de Soto, H. (1989). The Other Path. New York: Harper & Row Publishers. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91. Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing, 76, 395–406. Espenshade, T. J. & Radford, A. W. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal: Race and Class in elite college admission and campus life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gorman, L. (2008). Minimum wages. In D. R. Henderson (ed.), The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, 2nd Ed. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved September 10, 2012 from the World Wide Web: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/MinimumWages.html# Green, K. & Armstrong, J. S. (2012). Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Disclaimers in Advertising. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31, 293-304. Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2008). The cost to the firm of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 581¬–612. Karpoff, J. M., & Lott, Jr.. J. R. (1993). The reputational penalty firms bear from committing criminal fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 757–802. Kearl, J. R., Pope, C. L., Whiting, G. C. & Wimmer, L. T. (1979). A confusion of economists? The American Economic Review, 69 (2), 28–37. King, R. C., Hartzel, K. S., Schilhavy, R. A. M., Melone, N. P & McGuire. T. W. (2010). Social responsibility and stakeholder influence: Does technology matter during stakeholder deliberation with high-impact decisions? Decision Support Systems, 48, 536-547. Lincoln Electric (2009). Lincoln Electric Code of Corporate Conduct and Ethics. Cleveland, OH: The Lincoln Electric Company [Available from http://www.lincolnelectric.com/en-us/company/investor-relations/Pages/code-corporate-conduct.aspx] Locke, E. A. & Latham. G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35 year odyssey. American Psychologist. 57, 705–717. Lott, J. R., Jr. (1992). Do we punish high-income criminals too heavily? Economic Inquiry, 30, 583–608. Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row. Miller, T., Holmes, K. R. Feulner, E. J., Kim, A. B., Riley, B., & Roberts, J. M. (2012). 2012 Index of Economic Freedom,.Washington & New York: The Heritage Foundation & The Wall Street Journal. Mintz, M. (1969). FDA and Panalba: A conflict of commercial, therapeutic goals? Science, 165 (August), 875–881. Mohan, S. (2010). Fair trade without the froth. The Institute of Economic Affairs Monographs, Hobart Paper, No. 170. Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. Rizzo, M. J., & Whitman, D G. (2009). The knowledge problem of new paternalism. Brigham Young University Law Review, 905–968. Skousen, M. (1997). The perseverance of Paul Samuelson's economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2): 137–152. Slovic, P. & MacPhillamy, D. J. (1974). Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 172–194. Smith, A. (1776, 2008). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Hamburg, Germany: Management Laboratory. Stecklow, S., & White, E. (2004). What price virtue? At some retailers, ‘fair trade’ carries a very high cost. The Wall Street Journal, 8 June. [Available from http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB108664921254731069,00.html] Target Corporation (2012). 2011 Corporate social responsibility report. online: Target.com. [Available from https://corporate.target.com/_media/TargetCorp/csr/pdf/2011-Target-Corporate-Responsibility-Report.pdf] Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press. The National Center for Public Policy Research (2012). Target executives grilled over company’s costly “sustainability” programs. Washington, D.C.: The National Center for Public Policy Research. [Available from http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Target_061312.html] Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness. in Diener, E. and Sugh, E.M., Culture and subjective wellbeing, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 257–288. Winston, C. (1993). Economic deregulation: days of reckoning for microeconomists. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1263-1289. Winston, C. (2006). Government failure versus market failure: Microeconomics policy research and government performance. Washington, D.C.: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. [Available from http://www.brookings.edu/press/Books/2006/governmentfailurevsmarketfailure.aspx] Winston, C. (2008). The efficacy of information policy: A review of Archeron Fung, Mary Graham, and David Weil’s full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 704–717. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43007 |