Santosh Kumar, Sahu and K., Narayanan (2011): Energy Intensity and Firm Performance: Do Energy Clusters Matter?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43457.pdf Download (377kB) | Preview |
Abstract
According to the basic law of supply and demand, as the cost of energy input rises, ceteris paribus, producer prefers to employ smaller quantity of energy input and substitute cheaper inputs for more expensive energy during the production process (Schurr, 1982; Jorgenson, 1984). Hence, the question arises whether determinants of profitability of firms differ based on different types of energy consumption. In analyzing this phenomenon for Indian manufacturing industries, this study tries to find out the determinants of profitability of firms based on three energy clusters (natural gas, petroleum and coal) of Indian manufacturing industries. This study uses data from the PROWESS database provided by the Center for Monitoring Indian Economy from 2000-2008. The finding of the study suggests that capital intensity, age of the firm and MNE affiliation of firms are the common determinants of profitability for different energy clusters in Indian manufacturing industries. However, the determinants of profitability differ for variables such as energy intensity, size of firm and R&D intensity and based on the choice of primary source of energy consumption. In the debate of CDM, climate change; shifting from traditional fuel sources to recent fuel source might help in reducing CO2 emissions, specifically for developing country such as India. Fiscal policies support to industries such as value-added tax exemption for new energy conservation products, import duty reduction and exemption for energy conservation technology might help Indian manufacturing industries to increase the profitability as well as energy efficiency.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Energy Intensity and Firm Performance: Do Energy Clusters Matter? |
English Title: | Energy Intensity and Firm Performance: Do Energy Clusters Matter? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Energy, Profitability, Cluster, Indian Manufacturing Industries |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B23 - Econometrics ; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy |
Item ID: | 43457 |
Depositing User: | Santosh Kumar Sahu |
Date Deposited: | 29 Dec 2012 01:20 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 08:02 |
References: | Beije, P. R., and Nuys, H. O., (1995), The Dutch Diamond: The Usefulness of Porter in Analyzing Small Countries, Leuven-Apeldoorn Bernard, A. B. and Jensen B. (2001), Why Some Firms Export?, NBER Working Paper No. W8349 Brush, T. H., Philip B., Margaretha H., (1999), “The Relative Influence of Industry and Corporation on Business Segment Performance: An Alternative Estimate,” Strategic Management Journal Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 519-547 Chari, S., (2000), The Agrarian Origins of the Knitwear Industrial Cluster in Tiruppur, India, World Development, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp 579-599 Clancy, P. and Twomey, M., (1997), The Irish Popular Music Industry: An Application of Porter’s Cluster Analysis, Research Series Paper No. 2, Dublin, National Economic and Social Council Clancy, P., O’malley, E., O’connell, L., and Egeraat, C. V., (1998), Culliton’s Clusters: Still the Way to Go?, in National Economic and Social Council, Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Proceedings of NESC Seminar, Research Series, Dublin, National Economic and Social Council Cornillie, J., and Samuel F., (2004), The Energy Intensity of Transition Countries, Energy Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 283-295 Couto, A., and Daniel G., (2009), The Determinants of Efficiency and Productivity in European Railways. Applied Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 2827 – 2851 Faruq, H. A., and David T. Yi., (2010), The Determinants of Technical Efficiency of Manufacturing Firms in Ghana. Global Economy Journal, Vol. 10, Issue 3, Article 7 Goldar, B., (2010), Energy Intensity of Indian Manufacturing Firms: Effect of Energy Prices, Technology and Firm Characteristics, Working Papers id:2483, eSocialSciences Groot, H., Erik, L. F., Verhoef, T., and Nijkamp, P., (2001) Energy Saving by Firms: Decision-making, Barriers and Policies. Energy Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 717-740 Hansen, G. and Wernerfelt, B., (1989), Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 399-511 Hernesniemi, H., Markku, L., and Pekka Y., (1996), Advantage Finland: The Future of Finnish Industries, Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy/ETLA-The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Hirschey, Mark and W. Wichern (1984), “Accounting and Market-Value Measures of Profitability: Consistency, Determinants, and Uses,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 375-383 Hrovatin, N., and Urib, S. 2002. The Determinants of Firm Performance after Ownership Transformation in Slovenia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 35 (June):169-190 Industrial Policy Review Group, (1992), A Time for Change: Industrial Policy for the 1990s, Dublin, Stationery Office Jacobs, D., Boekholt, P., and Zegveld, W., (1990), The Competitive Advantage of the Netherlands, The Hague, SMO Jorgenson, Dale W.1984. The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth. The EnergyJournal 5 (May): 11-26. Juneja J.S., (1998), Small & Medium Enterprises-Challenges and Opportunities, All India Management Association, New Delhi Kagawa, S., Y. Oshita, K. Nansai, S. Suh, (2009), How has dematerialization contributed to reducing oil price pressure? A qualitative input–output analysis for the Japanese economy during 1990–2000, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43, pp 245–252 Kelton, C.L., M. K. Pasquale, R. P. Rebelein, (2008), Using the North American industry classification system (NAICS) to identify national industry cluster templates for applied regional analysis, Regional Studies, Vol. 42, pp 305–321 Kessides, I. N. (1990), “Internal Versus External Market Conditions and Firm Profitability: An Exploratory Model”, Economic Journal, Vol. 100, No. 402, pp. 773 Kumar N. and N.S. Siddharthan (1994), “Technology, Firms Size and Export behavior in Developing Countries: The Case of Indian Enterprises, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 289-309 Lachaal, Lassaad , Boubaker Karray, Dhehibi Boubaker, and Ali Chebil. 2005. Technical Efficiency Measures and Its Determinants for Olive Producing Farms in Tunisia: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. African Development Review 17, (December): 580–591. Lenzen, M., (2003), Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 14, pp 1–34 Martínez, Clara Inés Pardo. 2010. Energy Efficiency Development in German and Colombian Non-energy-intensive Sectors: a Non-parametric Analysis. Energy Efficiency 4 (March):115-131. Metcalf, G., (2008), An empirical analysis of energy intensity and its determinants at the state level, Energy Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 1-26 Metcalf, Gilbert E. 2008. An Empirical Analysis of Energy Intensity and Its Determinants at the State Level. The Energy Journal 29 (January): 1-26. Murillo-Zamorano, Luis R. 2005. The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth: A Controversial Issue? The Energy Journal 26. Issue 2:.69-88 National Economic and Social Council, (1998), Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Proceedings of NESC Seminar, Research Series, Dublin: National Economic and Social Council Newell R, Jaffe A, Stavins R., (1999), The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal Economics, Vol. 114, pp. 941–975 O’connell, L., Chris V. E., and Pat, E., (1997), The Irish Dairy Processing Industry: An Application of Porter’s Cluster Analysis, Research Series Paper No. 1, Dublin, National Economic and Social Council O’donnell, R., (1998), Post-Porter: Exploring Policy for the Irish Context Sustaining Competitive Advantage, in National Economic and Social Council, Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Proceedings of NESC Seminar, Research Series, Dublin: National Economic and Social Council. Oczkowski, Edward, and Kishor Sharma. 2005. Determinants of Efficiency in Least Developed Countries: Further Evidence from Nepalese Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Development Studies 41: 617-630. Oczkowski, Edward, and Kishor Sharma. 2005. Determinants of Efficiency in Least Developed Countries: Further Evidence from Nepalese Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Development Studies 41: 617-630. Oosterhaven, J., D. Stelder, (2002), Net multipliers avoid exaggerating impacts: with a bi-regional illustration for the Dutch transportation sector, Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 42, pp 533–543 Porter, M., (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London, Macmillan Roberts, Mark J. and James Tybout (1997) “The Decision to Export in Colombia: an Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs”, American Economic Review, 87(4), 545-64. Rose, Adam, and C. Y. Chen, 1991. Sources of Change in Energy Use in the U.S. Economy, 1972–1982: A Structural Decomposition Analysis. Resources and Energy 13 (April): 1-21. Sahu, S. K., Narayanan, K, (2009), Determinants of Energy Intensity: A Preliminary Investigation of Indian Manufacturing, MPRA Paper 16606, University Library of Munich, Germany Sahu, S. K., Narayanan, K, (2010), Determinants of Energy Intensity in Indian Manufacturing Industries: A Firm Level Analysis, MPRA Paper 21646, University Library of Munich, Germany Schurr, Sam H. 1982. Energy Efficiency and Productive Efficiency. Some Thoughts Based on American Experience. The Energy Journal 3 (July): 1-14. Sue-Wing, I, (2008), Explaining the declining energy intensity of the U.S. economy, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 21-49 Zelenyuk, Valentin, and Vitaliy Zheka. 2006. Corporate Governance and Firm's Efficiency: the Case of Transitional Country, Ukraine. Journal of Productivity Analysis 25: 143-168. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W and Poh, K. L., (2008), A Survey of Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies. European Journal of Operational Research 189 (August): 1 –18. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43457 |