Prokop, Jacek (2005): Monopolization through acquisition. Published in: The National Economy No. Special Issue (2006): pp. 163-176.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43683.pdf Download (320kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper considers the possibility of monopolizing a three-firm industry through acquisition of rivals in the absence of the restrictions imposed by the antitrust authorities. The analysis is conducted in two models: a static and a dynamic model of monopolization by a single buyer. In contrast to preceding models, a firm owner is allowed to use mixed strategies in order to decide whether to sell his firm or not. The static model implies that the monopolization through acquisition can be profitable. However, the dynamic formulation of the problem suggests that the expected profits are much smaller, and may not be sufficient to cover any fixed costs associated with the acquisition process. Moreover, the probability of selling the firm by its owner is almost zero, which makes the whole monopolization process extremely unlikely.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Monopolization through acquisition |
English Title: | Monopolization through acquisition |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | monopolization; acquisitions; antitrust policy |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L41 - Monopolization ; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices |
Item ID: | 43683 |
Depositing User: | Jacek Prokop |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jan 2013 23:18 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 19:37 |
References: | Carlton D.W., Perloff J.M., [2000], Modern Industrial Organization, Addison-Wesley. Church J., Ware R., [2000], Industrial Organization. A Strategic Approach, The McGraw-Hill . Compte O., Jenny F., Rey P., [2002], Capacity Constraints, Mergers and Collusion, European Eco¬nomic Review, 46(1), pp. 1-29. Fudenberg D., Tirole J., [1992], Game Theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harris E.G., [1994], Why One Firm Is the Target and the Other the Bidder in Single-Bidder Synergistic Takeovers, Journal of Business, 67, pp. 263-80. Kamien M.I. and Zang I., [1990], The Limits of Monopolization Through Acquisition, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, pp. 465-99. Kamien M.I. and Zang I., [1993], Monopolization Through Sequential Acquisition, Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 9, pp. 205-29. Kuhn K.U., Motta M., [1999], The Economics of Joint Dominance, mimeo. Lehto P. and Tombak M.M., [1996], Consolidation and the Sequence of Acquisitions to Monopoly, mimeo. Perry M.K., Porter R., [1985], Oligopoly and the Incentive for Horizontal Merger, American Eco¬nomic Review, 75, pp. 219-227. Samuelson W.F., Marks S.G., [2003], Managerial Economics, J. Wiley & Sons. Tirole J., [1988], The Theory of Industrial Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachu¬setts. Varian H.R., [1999], Intermediate Microeconomics. A Modern Approach, W.W. Norton & Co., New York. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43683 |