New Evidence on Gibrat’s Law for Cities

González-Val, Rafael and Lanaspa, Luis and Sanz, Fernando (2012): New Evidence on Gibrat’s Law for Cities.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to test empirically the validity of Gibrat’s law on the growth of cities, using data on the complete distribution of cities (without size restrictions) from three countries (the US, Spain and Italy) for the entire twentieth century. In order to achieve this, different techniques are used. First, panel data unit root tests tend to confirm the validity of Gibrat’s law in the upper-tail distribution. Second, when the entire distribution is considered using nonparametric methods, it is found that Gibrat’s law does not hold exactly in the long-term (in general, size affects the variance of the growth process but not its mean). Moreover, the lognormal distribution works well as a description of city size distributions across the whole century when no truncation point is considered.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gibrat’s Law; city size distribution; urban growth
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General > R00 - General

References

Ades, A. F. and Glaeser, E. L. (1995). Trade and circuses: explaining urban giants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 195–227.

Anderson, G. and Ge, Y. (2005). The Size Distribution of Chinese Cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35: 756–776.

Azagra, J., Chorén, P., Goerlich, F. J. and Mas, M. (2006). La localización de la población española sobre el territorio. Un siglo de cambios: un estudio basado en series homogéneas (1900–2001). Fundación BBVA.

Banerjee, A., Massimiliano M. and Osbat, C. (2005). Testing for PPP: should we use panel methods? Empirical Economics, 30: 77–91.

Black, D. and Henderson, V. (2003). Urban evolution in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(4): 343–372.

Bosker, M., Brakman S., Garretsen H. and Schramm, M. (2008). A century of shocks: the evolution of the German city size distribution 1925–1999. Regional Science and Urban Economics 38: 330–347.

Brakman, S., Garretsen, H. and Schramm, M. (2004). The Strategic Bombing of German Cities during World War II and its Impact on City Growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 201–218.

Cheshire, P. C. and Magrini, S. (2006). Population growth in European cities: weather matters - but only nationally. Regional Studies, 40(1): 23–37.

Clark, J. S. and Stabler, J. C. (1991). Gibrat's Law and the Growth of Canadian Cities. Urban Studies, 28(4): 635–639.

Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 829–836.

Córdoba, J. C. (2008). A generalized Gibrat’s Law for Cities. International Economic Review, 49(4): 1463–1468.

Davis, D. R. and Weinstein D. E. (2002). Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity. American Economic Review, 92(5): 1269–1289.

Duranton, G. (2006). Some Foundations for Zipf´s Law: product proliferation and local spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36: 542–563.

Duranton, G. (2007). Urban evolutions: the fast, the slow, and the still. American Economic Review, 97(1): 197–221.

Eaton, J. and Eckstein, Z. (1997). Cities and growth: theory and evidence from France and Japan. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27(4–5): 443–474.

Eeckhout, J. (2004). Gibrat's Law for (All) Cities. American Economic Review, 94(5): 1429–1451.

Eeckhout, J. (2009). Gibrat’s Law for (all) Cities: Reply. American Economic Review, 99(4): 1676–1683.

Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s Law for Cities: An Explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3): 739–767.

Gabaix, X. and Ibragimov, R. (2011). Rank-1/2: A simple way to improve the OLS estimation of tail exponents. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(1): 24–39.

Gabaix, X. and Ioannides, Y. M. (2004). The Evolution of City Size Distributions. In Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, vol. 4, ed. John V. Henderson and Jean. F. Thisse, 2341–2378. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland.

Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités Économiques. París: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.

Giesen K. and Südekum J. (2011). Zipf’s Law for cities in the regions and the country. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(4): 667–686.

Giesen, K., Zimmermann A. and Suedekum J. (2010). The size distribution across all cities – double Pareto lognormal strikes. Journal of Urban Economics, 68: 129–137.

Glaeser, E. L. and Shapiro, J. M. (2002). Cities and warfare: the impact of terrorism on urban form. Journal of Urban Economics, 51: 205–224.

Glaeser, E. L. and Shapiro, J. M. (2003). Urban Growth in the 1990s: Is city living back? Journal of Regional Science, 43(1): 139–165.

González-Val, R. (2010). The evolution of the US city size distribution from a long-run perspective (1900–2000). Journal of Regional Science, 50(5): 952–972.

González-Val, R. (2012). A nonparametric estimation of the local Zipf exponent for all US cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(6): 1119–1130.

González-Val, R., Lanaspa L. and Sanz-Gracia, F. (2013). Gibrat’s law for cities, growth regressions and sample size. Economics Letters, 118(2): 367–369.

Guérin-Pace, F. (1995). Rank-size distribution and the process of urban growth. Urban Studies, 32(3): 551–562.

Härdle, W. (1990). Applied Nonparametric Regression. In Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Henderson, V. and Wang, H. G. (2007). Urbanization and city growth: the role of institutions. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(3): 283–313.

Ioannides, Y. M. and Overman, H. G. (2003). Zipf’s Law for cities: an empirical examination. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33: 127–137.

Kalecki, M. (1945). On the Gibrat Distribution. Econometrica, 13(2): 161–170.

Kim, S. (2000). Urban Development in the United States. Southern Economic Journal, 66: 855–880.

Kim, S. and Margo R. A. (2004). Historical Perspectives on U.S. Economic Geography. Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, vol. 4, J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland, Chapter 66, pp. 2982–3019.

Levy, M. (2009). Gibrat’s Law for (all) Cities: A Comment. American Economic Review, 99(4): 1672–1675.

Michaels, G., Rauch F. and Redding S. J. (2012). Urbanization and Structural Transformation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2): 535–586 .

Moon, H.R., Perron B., and Phillips P. C. B. (2007). Incidental trends and the power of panel unit root tests. Journal of Econometrics, 141(2): 416–459.

Parr, J. B. and Suzuki, K. (1973). Settlement populations and the lognormal distribution. Urban Studies, 10: 335–352.

Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22: 265–312.

Petrakos, G., Mardakis, P. and Caraveli, H. (2000). Recent developments in the Greek system of urban centres. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(2): 169–181.

Reed, W. (2002). On the rank-size distribution for human settlements. Journal of Regional Science, 42: 1–17.

Resende, M. (2004). Gibrat’s Law and the growth of cities in Brazil: a panel data investigation. Urban Studies, 41(8): 1537–1549.

Santarelli, E., Klomp, L. and Thurik, R. (2006). Gibrat's Law: An Overview of the Empirical Literature. In Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Innovation: the Dynamics of Firms and Industries, ed. Enrico Santarelli, 41–73. New York: Springer.

Soo, K. T. (2007). Zipf's Law and urban growth in Malaysia. Urban Studies, 44(1): 1–14.

Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat's Legacy. Journal of Economic Literature. 35(1): 40–59.