Najda-Janoszka, Marta (2012): Matching imitative activity of high-tech firms with entrepreneurial orientation. Published in: Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation , Vol. 8, No. 1 (2012): pp. 52-67.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43922.pdf Download (322kB) | Preview |
Abstract
As pointed by numerous scholars high technology sectors are very apt for studying entrepreneurial activities due to their high levels of innovativeness. However, taking into account the highly dynamic and substantially hostile environment in those sectors innovation may often not be the best strategic choice for market entry. In high-tech industries the boundaries between the innovation and imitation are often blurred. Hence, following the pioneer does not eliminate risk of market entry and is not necessarily equal to lack of capabilities, weak market position or inability to recognize market opportunities. In fact the business practice confirms the extensive utilization of imitation strategy by technology entrepreneurs. Meanwhile, the literature on entrepreneurship focuses almost exclusively on original innovators underestimating the importance of imitation in the growth process and indicating shortage of research on imitative activities of entrepreneurs. Therefore this article presents discussion on the applicability of entrepreneurial orientation to imitators from the high-tech industries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Matching imitative activity of high-tech firms with entrepreneurial orientation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | imitation, innovation, market-entry strategy, high-technology firms, entrepreneurial orientation |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D |
Item ID: | 43922 |
Depositing User: | Marta Najda-Janoszka |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jan 2013 20:30 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 02:11 |
References: | Afuah, A. (2009). Strategic Innovation: New Game Strategies for Competitive Advantage, New York: Routledge Bednarczyk M. (ed.) (2010). Przedsiębiorczość w turystyce. Zasady i praktyka, Warszawa, Wydawnictwa Wachowe CeDeWu; Cefis E., Marsili O. (2011). Born to flip. Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech and low-tech industries, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(3), 473-498 Covin J.G., Slevin D.P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7-25 Droege S.B., Dong L.C. (2008). Strategic entrepreneurship: imitation versus substitution, Journal of Small Business Strategy, 19(1), 51-62 Fagerberg J. (2005) Innovation: A Guide to the Literature. In: J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 1-26), New York: The Oxford University Press Fischer T. (2011). Managing Value Capture: Empirical Analyses of Managerial Challenges in Capturing Value, Heidelberg: Gabler Verlag – Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH Grandstrand O. (19980. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm, Research Policy, 27(5), 465-489 Henkel J., Baldwin C.Y. (2009). Modularity for Value Appropriation – Drawing the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, Harvard Business School Working Paper 09-097 ‘High technology’ and ‘knowledge based services’ aggregates based on NACE Rev.2, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/Annexes/htec_esms_an3.pdf Khandwalla P.N. (1977). Some top management styles, their context and performance, Organization & Administrative Sciences, 7(4), 21-51 Kreiser P.M., Marino L.D., Weaver K.M. (2002). Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: a Multi-Country Analysis, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 71-94 Lee R.P., Zhou K.Z. (2012), Is Product Imitation Good for Firm Performance? An Examination of Product Imitation Types and Contingency Factors, Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 1-16; Lindelof P., Lofsten H. (2006). Environmental hostility and firm behavior – an empirical examination of new technology-based firms on science parks, Journal of Small Business Management, 44 (3), 386-406 Lumpkin G. T., Dess G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance, Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), 135-172 Luo Y., Sun J., Wang S.L. (2011). Emerging Economy Copycats: Capability, Environment, and Strategy, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 37-56 Mansfield E. (1985). How rapidly does new industrial technology leak out? The Journal of Industrial Economics, 34(2), 217-223 Miller D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms, Management Science, 29 (7), 770-791 Miller D., Friesen P.H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link, Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-235 Najda-Janoszka M. (2011), Zatrzymywanie wartości w sieciach kooperacyjnych przedsiębiorstw, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, (169), 48 – 62 Palich L.E., Bagby D.R. 91995). Using Cognitive Theory to explain Entrepreneurial Risk-taking: Challenging the conventional wisdom, Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425-438 Park J.S. (2005). Opportunity recognition and product innovation in entrepreneurial hi-tech start-ups: a new perspective and supporting case study, Technovation, 25, 739-752 Schewe G. (1996). Imitation as a strategic option for external acquisition of technology, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 13(1), 55-82 Schmitz J.A. (1989). Imitation, Entrepreneurship, and Long-Run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 721-739 Schnaars S.P. (1994). Managing imitation strategies, New York: The Free Press Shane S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Organizational Science, 11(4), 448-469 Shenkar O. (2010). Copycats, Boston: Harvard Business Press Simon M., Houghton S.M., Aquino K. (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies, Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113-134 Sorensen J.B., Stuart T.E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81-112 Teece D.J. (2002). Managing Intellectual Capital, New York: Oxford University Press Zahra S.A. (1993). New product innovation in established companies: Associations with industry and strategy variables, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 47-69 Zahra S.A., Neubaum D.O. (1998). Environmental adversity and the entrepreneurial activities of new ventures, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 123-140 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43922 |