Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2013): Confused confusers. How to stop thinking like an economist and start thinking like a scientist.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44046.pdf Download (139kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The present paper takes it as an indisputable fact that subjective-behavioral thinking leads, for deeper methodological reasons, with inner necessity to inconclusive filibustering about the agents’ economic conduct and therefore has to be replaced by something fundamentally different. The key argument runs as follows: (a) the subjective-behavioral approach can not, as a matter of principle, afford a correct profit theory, (b) without a correct profit theory it is impossible to comprehend how the monetary economy works, (c) without this knowledge economic policy proposals are unjustifiable, (d) thinking like an economist may be hazardous to the economy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Confused confusers. How to stop thinking like an economist and start thinking like a scientist |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | new framework of concepts; structure-centric; axiom set; objectivestructural; income; profit; General Complementarity; subjective-behavioral; methodological individualism; opus magnum |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E00 - General D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D00 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 44046 |
Depositing User: | Egmont Kakarot-Handtke |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jan 2013 00:08 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 18:16 |
References: | Akerman, J. (1936). Annual Survey of Economic Theory: The Setting of the Central Problem. Econometrica, 4(2): 97–122. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1905243. Arnsperger, C., and Varoufakis, Y. (2006). What Is Neoclassical Economics? The Three Axioms Responsible for its Theoretical Oeuvre, Practical Irrelevance and, thus, Discursive Power. Paneconomicus, 1: 5–18. Arrow, K. J. (1994). Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 84(2): 1–9. URL http: //www.jstor.org/stable/2117792. Arrow, K. J., and Hahn, F. H. (1991). General Competive Analysis. Amsterdam, New York, NY, etc.: North-Holland. Boland, L. A. (2003). The Foundations of Economic Method. A Popperian Perspective. London, New York, NY: Routledge, 2nd edition. Coates, J. (2007). The Claims of Common Sense. Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, New York, NY, etc.: Cambridge University Press. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. Dennis, K. (1982). Economic Theory and the Problem of Translation (I). Journal of Economic Issues, 16(3): 691–712. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4225211. Desai, M. (2008). Profit and Profit Theory. In S. N. Durlauf, and L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, pages 1–11. Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition. URL http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000213. Feynman, R. P. (1992). The Character of Physical Law. London: Penguin. Goodwin, R. M. (1967). A Growth Cycle. In C. H. Feinstein (Ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Essays Presentend to Maurice Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hicks, J. R. (1937). Mr. Keynes and the "Classics": A Suggested Interpretation. Econometrica, 5(2): 147–159. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907242. Hutchison, T.W. (1960). The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory. New York, NY: Kelley. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011a). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (I). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1895268: 1–26. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1895268. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011b). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (II). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1903663: 1–19. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903663. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011c). Squaring the Investment Cycle. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1911796: 1–25. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911796. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2012). Primary and Secondary Markets. Levy Economics Institute Working Papers, 741: 1–27. URL http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1654. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2013). Why Post Keynesianism is Not Yet a Science. Economic Analysis and Policy, forthcoming. URL http://www.eap-journal.com/forthcoming.php. Kaldor, N. (1956). Alternative Theories of Distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 23(2): 83–100. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2296292. Kalecki, M. (1942). A Theory of Profits. Review of Economic Studies, 52: 258–267. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2225784. Keen, S. (2011). Debunking Economics. London, New York, NY: Zed Books, rev. edition. Keynes, J. M. (1973). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes Vol. VII. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan. Klant, J. J. (1994). The Nature of Economic Thought. Aldershot, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar. Knight, F. H. (2006). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Mineola, NY: Dover. Laidler, D. (1993). The Golden Age of the Quantity Theory. New York, NY, London, etc.: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Laidler, D. (1999). Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marshall, A. (2009). Principles of Economics. New York, NY: Cosimo, 8th edition. Mill, J. S. (2006). Principles of Political Economy With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, volume 3, Books III-V of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (1866). Minsky, H. P. (2008). Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New York, NY, Chicago, IL, San Francisco, CA: McGraw Hill, 2nd edition. Mirowski, P. (1986). Mathematical Formalism and Economic Explanation. In P. Mirowski (Ed.), The Reconstruction of Economic Theory, pages 179–240. Boston, MA, Dordrecht, Lancaster: Kluwer-Nijhoff. Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine Dreams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ricardo, D. (1981). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge, New York, NY, etc.: Cambridge University Press. (1821). Samuelson, P. A., and Nordhaus, W. D. (1998). Economics. Boston, MA, Burr Ridge, IL, etc.: Irwin, McGraw-Hill, 16th edition. Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick, NJ, London: Transaction Publishers. (1934). Smith, A. (2008). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1776). Stiglitz, J. E. (1996). Principles of Microeconomics. New York, NY, London: Norton. von Mises, L. (2007). Human Action. A Treatise on Economics, volume II. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (1949). Wickens, M. (2008). Macroeconomic Theory. A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44046 |