Almunia, Miguel and Lopez-Rodriguez, David (2012): The efficiency cost of tax enforcement: evidence from a panel of spanish firms.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44153.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In modern tax systems, firms remit the majority of tax revenues raised by the government, which gives them opportunities to avoid and evade taxes by misreporting their activities. In this paper, we use a natural policy experiment to analyze how firms respond to different tax enforcement regimes. The Spanish Large Taxpayers’ Unit (LTU) monitors and enforces the taxation of companies with operating revenue above €6 million, resulting in more frequent tax audits and more information requirements for those firms. We exploit this discontinuity in enforcement intensity to estimate the impact of low enforcement on tax reporting behavior, using a panel dataset of financial statements for 85% of Spanish firms in the period 1999-2007. We apply two different identification strategies. First, we find an excess mass of firms locating (“bunching”) just below the revenue threshold. Based on the number of bunching firms, we estimate that firms reduce reported revenue by 1.4% to 7.5% to avoid falling in the high enforcement regime. Second, we run panel regressions with firm fixed effects and find that reported input costs do not respond significantly to the change in tax enforcement. This suggests that firms react to the enforcement discontinuity mostly by reporting lower revenues, without significantly distorting production. The efficiency costs of tax enforcement are thus likely to be small because tax evasion constitutes a reallocation of income to tax-evading firms. A back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that the loss in tax revenue due to tax evasion by non-LTU firms is, however, significant. In light of these results, we discuss potential reforms to improve tax enforcement policies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The efficiency cost of tax enforcement: evidence from a panel of spanish firms. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | corporate tax evasion; tax enforcement; efficient taxation |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M48 - Government Policy and Regulation H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion and Avoidance |
Item ID: | 44153 |
Depositing User: | David Lopez-Rodriguez |
Date Deposited: | 03 Feb 2013 15:44 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:21 |
References: | A.E.A.T. (Several years): “Memoria de Administración Tributaria,” Discussion paper, Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria (Spanish Tax Agency). Allingham, M., and A. Sandmo (1972): “Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338. Andreoni, J., B. Erard, and J. Feinstein (1998): “Tax Compliance,” Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818–860. Bastani, S., and H. Selin (2012): “Bunching and Non-Bunching at Kink Points of the Swedish Tax Schedule,” CESifo Working Paper No. 3865. Bayer, R., and F. Cowell (2009): “Tax compliance and firms’ strategic interdependence,” Journal of Public Economics, 93, 1131–1143. BOE (Several years): “Ley de Presupuestos Generales del Estado,” Boletín Oficial del Estado. Cabral, L., and J. Mata (2003): “On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory,” American Economic Review, 93(4), 1075–1090. C.B.O. (2011): “Budget and Economic Outlook: Historical Budget Data,” Congressional Budget Office. Chetty, R. (2009): “Is the Taxable Income Elasticity a Sufficient Statistic to Calculate Deadweight Loss? The Implications of Evasion and Avoidance,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 31–52. Chetty, R. (2012): “Bounds on Elasticities with Optimization Frictions: A Synthesis of Micro and Macro Evidence on Labor Supply,” Econometrica, 80(3), 969–1018. Chetty, R., J. Friedman, T. Olsen, and L. Pistaferri (2011): “Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: Evidence from Danish Tax Records,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 749–804. Chetty, R., J. Friedman, and E. Saez (2012): “Using Differences in Knowledge Across Neighborhoods to Uncover the Impacts of the EITC on Earnings,” NBER Working Paper 18232. Chetty, R., A. Looney, and K. Kroft (2009): “Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence,” American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–1177. Christensen, K., R. Cline, and T. Neubig (2001): “Total Corporate Taxation: "Hidden", Above-the-Line, Non-Income Taxes,” National Tax Journal, LIV(3), 495–506. Dharmapala, D., J. Slemrod, and J. D. Wilson (2011): “Tax policy and the missing middle: Optimal tax remittance with firm-level administrative costs,” Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1036–1047. Feldstein, M. (1995): “The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panely Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act,” Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 551–572. Feldstein (1999): “Tax Avoidance and The Deadweight Loss of Income Taxation,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 674–680. I.E.F. (2011): “Evolución del Sistema Fiscal Español: 1978-2010,” Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. I.M.F. (2002): “Improving Large Taxpayers’ Compliance: A Review of Country Experience,” Team led by Katherine Baer. Kleven, H., K. Kreiner, and E. Saez (2009): “Why Can Modern Governments Tax So Much? An Agency Model of Firms as Fiscal Intermediaries,” NBER Working Paper 15218. Kleven, H., and M. Waseem (2012): “Using Notches to Uncover Optimization Frictions and Structural Elasticities: Theory and Evidence from Pakistan,” Working Paper, LSE. LaCaixa (2012): “¿Por Qué No Aumenta la Dimension de la Empresa Española?,” . Lucas, R. (1978): “On the Size Distribution of Business Firms,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508–523. O.E.C.D. (2011): “Tax Administration in OECD and Selected non-OECD Countries: Comparative Information Series (2010),” Discussion paper, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Paula, Á. D., and J. Scheinkman (2010): “Value-Added Taxes, Chain Effects, and Informality,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2, 195–221. Pomeranz, D. (2011): “No Taxation Without Information: Deterrence and Self-Enforcement in the Value-Added Tax,” Harvard University. Reinganum, J., and L. Wilde (1985): “Income Tax Compliance in a Principal-Agent Framework,” Journal of Public Economics, 26, 1–18. Saez, E. (2010): “Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points?,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(3), 180–212. Schneider, F., A. Buehn, and C. Montenegro (2010): “Shadow Economies all over the World: New Estimates for 162 Countries from 1999 to 2007,” Working Paper 322, Universidad de Chile. Slemrod, J. (2004): “The economics of corporate tax selfishness,” National Tax Journal, LVII(4), 877–900. Slemrod, J. (2008): “Does it Matter Who Writes the Check to the Government? The Economics of Tax Remittance,” National Tax Journal, LXI(2), 251–275. Slemord, J. (2010): “Buenas Notches: Lines and Notches in Tax System Design,” Working Paper, University of Michigan. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44153 |
Available Versions of this Item
- The efficiency cost of tax enforcement: evidence from a panel of spanish firms. (deposited 03 Feb 2013 15:44) [Currently Displayed]