Brie, Mircea (2009): Male authority vs. female authority in traditional rural society. Published in: Romanian Journal of Population Studies , Vol. Supple, No. Ioan Bolovan (coord.), Families Europe between the 19th and the 21st Centuries. From the Traditional Model to Contemporary PACS (2009): pp. 657-670.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44175.pdf Download (208kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In traditional rural societies, the relationships between the two partners are genuine community patterns. It is not good to mingle male authority with thefe male’s, just like it is not possible to reverse the roles. Each of them has clear-cutt asks on both inter-relational level and on the level of socio-economic activities within or outside the household. The (male or female) authority in point is brought to the foreground as early as the first contacts between the partners. The whole “courtship”, “proposal”, “dealing” with the bride’s father (moment often associated with engagement), wedding rituals, etc., show the division of authority between the two. The community and the Church are on man’s side. The male has authority on his family. Yet, the authority originates in the role of representing the family in front of the community, a role assumed by man. The woman has authority on household. Yet she has internal control only when the mother-in-law and generally female community “consider she is able” to respond to the needs and duties this authority supposes. In several regions in France, for instance, the young wife has to be an “apprentice” for a year by her mother-in-law or another woman, if the former is absent. Man’s authority is granted by civil and religious law, by family and community and especially by socio-professional structure of traditional society, by “male” and “female” professions. Male mortality (the man is the one who is exhausted, toils, sacrifices himself, dies first) entails respect finally leading to authority. The young man looking for a wife is not concerned if she can lead a cart or cope with field work (although they are not excluded). Most of the times, the “village rumours” inform him if the young woman is able to be a good housewife through a well built mental pattern. From another perspective, the relationship between man and woman are most of the times dominated by the relationship between them and their exploitation. Thus, the equation is enlarged to husband – wife – land. The new relationship is framed by a cosmic universe, by meteorological season cycles. It is a unique relationship. Individual (and family!) life is influenced by the slightest whim of weather and nature in general. There are two types of relationships between the spouses: 1. the case of those under their parent, relatives, customs watch, when the woman has an inferior status; 2. the case of those emancipated, “evading” the traditional, when the husband accepts woman’s “equality”. In the latter case, we can speak of a love union, where “happiness” is more present, the husband imposes less authority on his wife, where there is a consensus between the spouses and their relationship is based on tenderness and physical pleasure.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Male authority vs. female authority in traditional rural society |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | family; marriage; male authority; female authority; traditional rural society; status; role; collective mentalities |
Subjects: | N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J11 - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts |
Item ID: | 44175 |
Depositing User: | Mircea Brie |
Date Deposited: | 03 Feb 2013 15:55 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 16:59 |
References: | A.N-D.J. BH, CRSC: Arhivele Naţionale, Direcţia Judeţeană Bihor, Colecţia Registrelor de Stare Civilă A.N-D.J. BH, FEOO: Arhivele Naţionale, Direcţia Judeţeană Bihor, Fondul Episcopiei Ortodoxe Oradea Bock, 2002: Gisela Bock, Femeia în istoria Europei. Din Evul Mediu pînă în zilele noastre, ediţie în limba română tradusă de Mariana Cristina Bărbulescu, Polirom, Iaşi, 2002 Bozon, 1991: Michel Bozon, „Le mariage: montée et déclin d’une institution”, in La famille l’état des savoirs, volum coordonat de François de Singly, La Découverte, Paris, 1991 Chirilă, 2003: Georgeta Chirilă, „Aspecte privind statul juridic al femeii căsătorite din Ţara Românească şi Moldova reflectat de pravilele domneşti din secolul al XVII-lea”, in Studia Universitatis Petru Maior, Historia, 3, Târgu Mureş, 2003 Ciobănel, 1996: Alina Ioana Ciobănel, „Tipologia relaţiilor de rudenie”, in Anuarul Institutului de Etnografie şi Folclor „C. Brăiloiu”, nr. 7, Bucureşti, 1996 Ciupală, 2003: Alin Ciupală, Femeia în societatea românească a secolului al XIX-lea, Editura Meridiane, Bucureşti, 2003 Collomp, 1997: Alain Collomp, „Familii. Locuinţe şi coabitanţi”, in Istoria vieţii private, vol. VI, Editura Meridiane, Bucureşti, 1997 Dagenais, 2000: Daniel Dagenais, La fin de la famille moderne. La signification des transformations contemporaines de la famille, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2000 Ghibu, 1934: Onisifor Ghibu, Contribuţii la istoria poeziei noastre populare şi culte, Bucureşti, 1934 Goody, 2001: Jack Goody, La famille en Europe (ediţie în limba franceză tradusă de Jean-Perre Bardon şi prefaţată de Jacques Le Goff), Polirom, Paris, 2001 Guillaume, 1985, Pierre Guillaume, Individus, familles nations. Essai d’histoire démographique XIXe – XXe siècles, Paris, 1985 Marian, 2000: Simion Florea Marian, Nunta la români. Studiu istorico-comparativ, ed. îngrijită, introducere, bibliografie şi glosar de Iordan Datcu, Editura Saeculum I.O., Bucureşti, 2000 Mitu, 2000: Sorin Mitu, Imagini europene şi mentalităţi româneşti din Transilvania la începutul epocii moderne, Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, 2000 Mureşan, 2005: Florin Valeriu Mureşan, Satul Românesc din nord-estul Transilvaniei la mijlocul secolului al XVIII-lea, Institutul Cultural Român, Centrul de Studii Transilvane, Cluj-Napoca, 2005 Nicoară, 1997: Toader Nicoară, Transilvania la începuturile timpurilor moderne (1680-1800). Societate rurală şi mentalităţi colective, Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 1997 Platon, 2000: Alexandru-Florin Platon, Societate şi mentalităţi în Europa medievală. O introducere în antropologia istorică, Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Iaşi, 2000 Segalen, 1980: Martine Segalen, Mari et femme dans la société paysanne, Flammarion, Paris, 1980 Segalen, 1980: Martine Segalen, Sociologie de la famille, Armand Colin, Paris, 2002 Shorter, 1977: Edward Shorter, Naissance de la famille moderne XVIIIe-XXe siècle, Édition du Seuil, Paris, 1977 Ştefănescu, 2004: Barbu Ştefănescu, Sociabilitate rurală, violenţă şi ritual, Editura Universităţii din Oradea, Oradea, 2004 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44175 |