Huergo, E. and Trenado, Mayte / M. and Ubierna, Andrés / A. (2013): Impact of low-interest credits on business R&D expenditures: Spanish firms and CDTI loans for R&D projects.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44221.pdf Download (127kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Our objective is to estimate the effect of low-interest loans for R&D projects on business R&D. We take into account that the participation of firms in this kind of public programme probably depends on the same characteristics that determine their investment decisions. We also consider the possibility of persistence in R&D expenditures over time. The estimations provide evidence of the effectiveness of low-interest loans, being the stimulus effect larger for SMEs than for large firms and also higher for manufacturing than for services. Participants are approximately 25 percentage points more likely to self-finance their R&D investments than non-supported firms. The effect is quite relevant if we consider that the probability of self-financing R&D activities is 53.2 percentage points higher when the firm has invested in R&D activities in the previous year. This result suggests that firms can be induced persistently to perform R&D activities by means of loans.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Impact of low-interest credits on business R&D expenditures: Spanish firms and CDTI loans for R&D projects |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Low-interest credits, R&D projects, impact analysis |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H81 - Governmental Loans ; Loan Guarantees ; Credits ; Grants ; Bailouts L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L24 - Contracting Out ; Joint Ventures ; Technology Licensing |
Item ID: | 44221 |
Depositing User: | Elena Huergo |
Date Deposited: | 05 Feb 2013 20:37 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 18:21 |
References: | Aerts, K., and T. Schmidt (2008): “Two for the price of one? On additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany”, Research Policy 37(5), pp. 806-822. Aerts, K., Czarnitzki, D., and A. Fier (2007): “Evaluación econométrica de las políticas públicas de I+D: situación actual”. En: Heijs, J. and Buesa, M. (Eds.), Cooperación en innovación en España y el papel de las ayudas públicas, (pp. 79-104). Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Madrid. Arqué-Castells, P. and P. Mohnen (2012): “Sunk costs, extensive R&D subsidies and permanent inducement effects”, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 029, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. Arrow, K. J. (1962): “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Innovation”, en Nelson, editor, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, NBER book, Princeton University Press, Princeton. Arvanitis, S. and Hollenstein, H. (1994): “Demand and supply factors in explaining the innovative activity of Swiss manufacturing firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3, pp. 15-30. Audretsch, D. (1995): Innovation and Industry Evolution, MIT Press Blanes, J. V. and I. Busom (2004): “Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms”, Research policy 33(10), pp 1459-1476. Busom, I. (2000): “An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9(2), pp. 111-148. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002): “Complementarity in the innovation strategy: internal R&D, external technology acquisition, and cooperation in R&D”, Research paper Nº 457, IESE, Universidad de Navarra. Clausen, T. H. (2007): “Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovations activities at the firm level?”, TIK Working papers on Innovation Studies No. 20070615, Centre for technology, innovation and culture, Oslo. Czarnitzki, D. and G. Licht (2005): “Additionality of Public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany”, The Economics of Transition 14(1), pp. 101-131. David, P., Hall, B. H. and A. A. Toole (2000): “Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of econometric evidence”, Research Policy 29, pp. 497-529. Duguet, E. (2004): “Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data”, Revue d’Economie Politique 114(2), pp. 263-292. García-Quevedo, J. (2004): “Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence”, KYKLOS 57(1), pp. 87-102. Geroski, P.A., Van Reenen, J. and Walters, C.F. (1997): “How persistently do firms innovate?”, Research Policy 26, pp. 33-48. González, X., Jaumandreu, J. and C. Pazó (2005): “Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness”, The Rand Journal of Economics 36(4), pp. 930-949. González, X. and C. Pazó (2008): “Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?”, Research Policy 37(3), pp. 371-389. Heijs, J. (2005): “Identification of firms supported by technology policies: the case of Spanish low interest credits”, Science and Public Policy 32(3), pp. 219-230. Heckman, J.J. (1978): “Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system”, Econometrica 46(4), pp. 931-959. Heckman, J.J., Urzua, S. and E. Vytlacil (2006): “Understanding instrumental variables in models with essential heterogeneity”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3), pp. 389-432. Herrera, L., and J. Heijs (2007): “Difusión y adicionalidad de las ayudas públicas a la innovación”, Revista de Economía Aplicada 44, pp.177–197. Huergo, E. and Jaumandreu, J. (2004): “Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth”, International Journal of Industrial Organization 22(4), pp. 541-559. Huergo, E. and Trenado, M. (2010): “The Application for and the Awarding of Low-Interest Credits to Finance R&D Projects”, Review of Industrial Organization 37(3), pp. 237-259. Klepper, S. (1996): “Entry, exit, and innovation over the product life-cycle”, American Economic Review 86, pp. 562-583. Klette, T. J., Moen J. and Z. Griliches (2000): “Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies”, Research Policy 29, pp. 471–495. Lach, S. (2002): “Do R&D subsidies stimulate or Displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel”, Journal of Industrial Economics 50(4), pp. 369-390. Mañez-Castillejo, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis-Llopis, A. and Sanchis-Llopis, J. (2009): “The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R&D”, Journal of Industrial Economics 57(4), pp. 712-735. OECD (2006): Government R&D funding and company behaviour. Measuring behavioural additionality. OECD report. Peters, B. (2009): “Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence”, The Journal of Technology Transfer 34(2), pp. 226-243. Raymond, W., Mohnen, P., Palm, F., and Schim van der Loeff, S. (2010): “Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious?”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 92(3), pp. 495-504. Takalo, T., Tanayama, T. and O. Toivanen (forthcoming): “Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D sub-sidies”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00280. Wallsten, S. J. (2000): “The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program”, The Rand Journal of Economics 31(1), pp. 82-100. Wooldridge, J. (2005): “Simple Solutions to the Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 20(1), pp. 39–54. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44221 |