Which Industry is Greener? Empirical Study for Nine Industries in OECD Countries

Fujii, Hidemichi and Managi, Shunsuke (2012): Which Industry is Greener? Empirical Study for Nine Industries in OECD Countries.

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationship between CO2 emissions of different industries and economic growth in OECD countries from 1970 to 2005. We tested an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis and found that total CO2 emissions from nine industries show an N-shaped trend instead of an inverted U or monotonic increasing trend with increasing income. The EKC hypothesis for sector-level CO2 emissions was supported in (1) paper, pulp and printing industry, (2) wood and wood products industry, and (3) construction industry. We also found that emissions from coal and oil increase with economic growth in steel and construction industries. Meanwhile, non-metallic minerals, machinery, and transport equipment industries tend to have increased emissions from oil and electricity with increased economic development. Finally, the EKC turning point and the relationship between GDP per capita and sectoral CO2 emissions differ among industries according to the fuel type used. Therefore, the environmental policies for CO2 reduction need to consider these differences in industrial characteristics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: environmental Kuznets curve; CO2 emission; industrial sector; OECD countries
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q40 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming

References

Auffhammer, M., Carson, R.T., 2008. Forecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55, 229-247.

Akbostanci, E., Turut-Asik, S., Tunc, G.I., 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37(3), 861-867.

Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., Nguyen-Van, P., 2006. Economic development and CO2 emissions: A nonparametric panel approach. Journal of Public Economics 90, 1347-1363.

Barros, C.P., Managi, S. forthcoming. French nuclear electricity plants: Productivity and air pollution. Energy Sources Part B.

Bruvoll, A., Medin, H., 2003. Factors Behind the Environmental Kuznets Curve - A Decomposition of the Changes in Air Pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics 24, 27–48.

Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics 49(4), 431–455.

Farzin, Y.H., Bond, C.A., 2006. Democracy and environmental quality. Journal of Development Economics 81, 213– 235.

Fujii, H., Managi, S., (forthcoming). Decomposition of toxic chemical substance management in three U.S. manufacturing sectors from 1991 to 2008. Journal of Industrial Ecology.

Franklin, R.S., Ruth, M., 2012. Growing up and cleaning up: The environmental Kuznets curve redux. Applied Geography 32(1), 29-39.

Galeotti, M., Manera, M., Lanza, A., 2009. On the robustness of robustness checks of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics 42, 551-574.

Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353-377.

He, J., Richard, P., 2010. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecological Economics 69(5), 1083-1093.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2011a. Light Truck. Technology Brief T08, Energy Technology System Analysis Programme, IEA, Paris.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2011b. Heavy Truck. Technology Brief T08, Energy Technology System Analysis Programme, IEA, Paris.

Iwata, H., Okada, K., Samreth, S., 2010. Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: The role of nuclear energy. Energy Policy 38(8), 4057-4063.

Jalil, A., Mahmud, S.F., 2009. Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12), 5167-5172.

Kijima, M., Nishide, K., Ohyama, A., 2010. Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34(7), 1187-1201.

Kim, S.W., Lee, K., Nam, K., 2010. The relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth: The case of Korea with nonlinear evidence. Energy Policy 38(10), 5938-5946.

Kuosmanen, T., Bijsterbosch, N., Dellink, R., 2009. Environmental cost–benefit analysis of alternative timing strategies in greenhouse gas abatement: A data envelopment analysis approach. Ecological Economics 68(6), 1633-1642.

Lindmark, L., Bergquist, A.K., Andersson, L.F., 2011. Energy transition, carbon dioxide reduction and output growth in the Swedish pulp and paper industry: 1973–2006. Energy Policy 39(9), 5449–5456.

Managi, S., Hibki, A., Tsurumi, T., 2009. Does Trade Openness Improve Environmental Quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58 (3), 346-363.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2009. The Economics of climate change mitigation: Policies and options for global action beyond 2012. OECD, Paris.

Perkins, R., Neumayer, E., 2012. Do recipient country characteristics affect international spillovers of CO2-efficiency via trade and foreign direct investment? Climatic Change 112 (2), 469-491.

Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., Kindermann, G., Nakicenovic, N., Rafaj, P., 2011. RCP 8.5 - A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change 109(1-2), 33-57.

Selden, T. M., Forrest, A. S., Lockhart, J. E., 1999, Analyzing reductions in U.S. air pollution emissions: 1970 to 1990. Land Economics 75, 1-21.

Southworth, K., 2009. Corporate voluntary action: A valuable but incomplete solution to climate change and energy security challenges. Policy and Society 27(4), 329-350.

Stern, D.I., 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32(8), 1419-1439.

Suri, V., Chapman, D., 1998. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 25(2), 195–208.

Tavoni, M., Cian, E.D., Luderer, G., Steckel, J.C., Waisman, H., 2012. The value of technology and of its evolution towards a low carbon economy. Climatic Change 114, 39-57.

Tsurumi, T., Managi, S., 2010. Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects. Environmental Economics and Policy Study 11, 19-36.

Turner, K., Hanley, N., 2011. Energy efficiency, rebound effects and the environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Economics 33(5), 709-720.

United State Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) 2009. Potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the construction sector. Sector strategies. U.S. EPA, Washington.

Wagner, M., 2008. The carbon Kuznets curve: A cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resource and Energy Economics 30, 388-408.

Yanai, M., Koch, J., Dayan, U., 2010. Trends in CO2 emissions in Israel - an international perspective. Climatic Change 101(3-4), 555-563.