Guo, Xu and Zhu, Xuehu and Wong, Wing-Keung and Zhu, Lixing (2013): A Note on Almost Stochastic Dominance.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44365.pdf Download (91kB) | Preview |
Abstract
To satisfy the property of expected-utility maximization, Tzeng et al. (2012) modify the almost second-degree stochastic dominance proposed by Leshno and Levy (2002) and define almost higher-degree stochastic dominance. In this note, we further investigate the relevant properties. We define an almost third-degree stochastic dominance in the same way that Leshno and Levy (2002) define second-degree stochastic dominance and show that Leshno and Levy's (2002) almost stochastic dominance has the hierarchy property but not expected-utility maximization. In contrast, Tzeng et al.'s (2012) definition has the property of expected-utility maximization but not the hierarchy property. This phenomenon also holds for higher-degree stochastic dominance for these two concepts. Thus, the findings in this paper suggest that Leshno and Levy's (2002) definitions of ASSD and ATSD might be better than those defined by Tzeng et al. (2012) if the hierarchy property is considered to be an important issue.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Note on Almost Stochastic Dominance |
English Title: | A Note on Almost Stochastic Dominance |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Almost stochastic dominance; expected-utility maximization; hierarchy of stochastic dominance |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions |
Item ID: | 44365 |
Depositing User: | Wing-Keung Wong |
Date Deposited: | 14 Feb 2013 08:47 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 00:50 |
References: | Bali, T.G., Demirtas, K. O., Levy, H., Wolf, A. (2009), Bonds versus stocks: Investors' age and risk taking. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(6), 817-830. Denuit, M. M., Eeckhoudt, L. (2010), A general index of absolute risk attitude. Management Science, 56(4), 712-715. Eeckhoudt, L., Schlesinger, H. (2006), Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96(1), 280-289. Hadar J., Russell W.R. (1969), Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects, American Economic Review, 59, 25-34. Leshno, M., Levy, H. (2002), Preferred by ``all'' and preferred by ``most'' decision makers: Almost stochastic dominance. Management Science, 48(8), 1074-1085. Levy, H. (2006), Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making Under Uncertainty, Springer, New York. Levy, M. (2009), Almost Stochastic Dominance and stocks for the long run, European Journal of Operational Research 194, 250-257. Levy, H., Leshno, M, Leibovitch, B. (2010), Economically relevant preferences for all observed epsilon, Annals of Operations Research, 176, 153-178. Tzeng, L. Y., Huang, R. J., Shih, P-T. (2012), Revisiting Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance, Management Science, DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1616. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J. Whitmore G.A. (1970), Third-degree Stochastic Dominance, American Economic Review, 60, 457-459. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44365 |