Equity in social policy, a human rights and results based approach A welfare state comparison: the case of disability

van geystelen, judit and poi rot, etienne pascal (2012): Equity in social policy, a human rights and results based approach A welfare state comparison: the case of disability. Forthcoming in: conference paper ASMDA 2013

Abstract

The reinforcement of equity and the inclusion of vulnerable population groups in social welfare systems development remains prominent in both, local and global policy arena. This paper assesses the hypothesis that certain welfare regimes produce more equitable social welfare outcomes than others. A human rights and results based perspective is adopted to explore whether there may be a relation between social welfare outcomes in the general population and in less advantaged population groups across welfare systems with different classification. Welfare sample states are consistent with a tripartite classification of welfare regimes, namely: a) social: Denmark, Norway, Sweden; b) corporatist: France, Germany; and c) liberal: United Kingdom, United States of America. For the purpose of this paper “people living with disability” represent vulnerable population groups. A choice founded on the universal characteristics of disability, including its complexity that requires a holistic approach with strong cross sector collaboration. Results from both, the general and vulnerable population were tabulated to calculate a human rights and results based equity index (HREI). The integration of an additional cost factor allowed to explore cost-effectiveness. Findings confirm the hypothesis that certain welfare regimes do produce more equitable social welfare outcomes than others with the social regime to produce best and most equitable results as well as best appreciation of cost-effectiveness. The latter could indicate that welfare systems founded on limited de-commodification, high public investment, priorisation of employment and valuing of collectivity and solidarity are most efficient. Yet, more in-depth research would be required to validate these findings and to better understand causality.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Equity, social policy, welfare state comparison, results based approach, disability.
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General > I00 - General

References

1 Castel F, Mitchell D. Worlds of welfare and families of nations. In: Castles F: Families of Nations. Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company. 1993; 93–128.

2 United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations; 1948.

3 United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: United Nations; 1989.

4 United Nations. Convention on the Rights of People Living with Disabilities. New York: United Nations; 2006.

5 United Nations. Convention on the Rights of People Living with Disabilities, Optional Protocol. New York: United Nations; 2006.

6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Disability programmes in need of reform. Policy brief. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2003. Available from: www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief

7 World Health Organisation. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.

8 Mike O. The individual and social models of disability. Paper presented at the Joint workshop of the living options group and research unit of the Royal College of Physicians on People with established locomotor disabilities in hospitals; 1990. Available from: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Oliver/in%20soc%20dis.pdf Accessed on 15 April 2012

9 World Health Organisation. Classifications, ICF Application areas; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/appareas/en/index.html Accessed on 20 May 2012

10 United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Training manual on disability statistics. Bangkok: United Nations; 2008.

11 Mitchell D. Income Transfer Systems: A Comparative Study Using Microdata. Ph.D. Canberra: Australian National University 1990.

12 Esping-Andersen G. Comparative welfare regimes re-examined. Social foundations of post industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999; 73–94.

13 Arts W, Gelissen J. Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state of the art report. J Eur Soc Policy. 2002; 12(2):137–158.

14 Bambra C. Going beyond The three worlds of welfare capitalism: regime theory and public health research. Epidemiol Community Health. 2007; 61:1098–1102.

15 Carsten J. Worlds of welfare services and transfers. J Eur Soc Policy. 2008; 18 (2):151–162.

16 European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Special needs education, country data 2010. Odense: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education; 2011.

17 Warnock M (2005) Special education needs: a new look, No.11 in a series of policy discussions. Salisbury: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain; 2005.

18 International Labor Office. Disability Discrimination at Work. Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights Work, Factsheet. No date. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@declaration/documents/publication/wcms_decl_fs_87_en.pdf Accessed on March 2012

19 Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook. Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency; 2012. Available from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ Accessed on 10 May 2012

20 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Population Prospects. The 2010 Revision. CD-ROM Edition. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2011.

21 World Health Organisation. Deafness and hearing impairment. Factsheet No 300. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/index.html Accessed on 10 April 2012

22 Mathers C, Smith A, Concha M. Global burden of hearing loss in the year 2000. Geneva: World Health Organisation. No date. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/bod_hearingloss.pdf Accessed on 10 April 2012

23 World Health Organisation. Visual impairment and blindness. Factsheet No 282. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/ Accessed on 5 March 2012

24 Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti S P & Pokharel G P. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Org. 2008; 86:63–70.

25 Gilbert C E, Ellwein L B, Refractive Error Study in Children Study Group. Prevalence and causes of functional Low Vision in School-age Children: Results from Standardized Population Surveys in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(3):877–881.

26 World Health Organisation. Mental and neurological disorders. Fact Sheet: The World Health Report; 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2001/media_centre/en/whr01_fact_sheet1_en.pdf Accessed on 5 May 2012

27 Pallab K M, Mascarenhas M N, Mathers C D, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32(2):419–436.

28 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Social Policy Division. CO1.2: Life expectancy at birth. OECD Family Database; 2011. Available from: www.oecd.org/social/family/database

29 Academic Network of European Disability Experts. Country Reports on Equality of Educational and Training Opportunities for Young Disabled People; 2010. Available from: http://www.disability-europe.net/ Accessed on 11 November 2011

30 United States of America, Department of Education. Thirty Years of Progress in Education Children with Disabilities Through IDEA; 2010. Washington D C: US Department of Education, 2010. Available from: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/idea35/history/idea-35-history.pdf Accessed on 20 November 2011

31 U.S. Department of Education. The SAS System, Table 2-2. Students ages 6 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B, by educational environment and state: Fall 2006. Washington D C; 2007. Available from: http://www.ideadata.org/tables30th%5Car_2-2.htm Accessed on 21 December 2011

32 Ebersold S, Schmitt M J, Priestley M (2011) Inclusive education for young disabled people in Europe: trends, issues and challenges. Academic Network of European Disability Experts; 2011. Available from: http://www.disability-europe.net/ Accessed on 10 October 2011 33 European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Key principles for promoting quality in inclusive education – recommendations for policy makers. Odense: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education; 2009. Accessed on 15 October 2011

34 Danish Disability Council. Danish Disability Policy – equal opportunities through dialogue. Copenhagen: The Equal Opportunities Centre for Disabled Persons; 2002.

35 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Dataset: statistics extracts. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx Accessed between October 2011–May 2012

36 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sickness, Disability and Work. Keeping on track in the economic downturn. Background paper. High-Level Forum, Stockholm, 14-15 May 2009. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2009. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/42/15/42699911.pdf Accessed on 7 December 2011

37 Direction de l'information légale et administrative. La politique du handicap; 2011. Available from: http://www.vie-publique.fr/politiques-publiques/politique-handicap/chronologie/ Accessed on 10 May 2012

38 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Quality of life - Society - Subjective well-being. Factbook 2010: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics - ISBN 92-64-08356-1. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2010.

39 Albrecht G L, Devlieger P J. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med; 1999: 48(8): 977–988.

40 Li L, Moore D. Acceptance of disability and its correlates. J Soc Psychol; 1998:138(1):13–25.

41 Inglehart R. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990 in Pacek P, Freeman B. The welfare state and quality of life: a cross-national analysis. No date. Available from: http://freedownload.is/pdf/the-history-of-the-welfare-state-is-one-of-conflict-12401298.html Accessed on 23 May 2012

42 Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1990; 9–34.