Impact of IFRS transition on audit and non-audit fees: evidence from small and medium-sized listed companies in Finland.

Vieru, Markku and Schadewitz, Hannu (2010): Impact of IFRS transition on audit and non-audit fees: evidence from small and medium-sized listed companies in Finland. Published in: The Finnish Journal of Business Economics , Vol. 59, No. 1 (2010): pp. 11-41.

Abstract

This study focuses on fees paid to auditors during a major accounting change associated with extra audit risk and work. Specifically, we analyse how a major accounting change from local GAAP to IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) affects the audit and non-audit fees paid to auditors. Prior research had evidenced that several auditee-specific properties are associated with audit fees. However, there is lack of specific knowledge on how a major accounting change affects audit and, especially, non-audit fees. Our sample comprises Finnish listed firms that adopted IFRS for the first-time. The Finnish data are employed since prior research findings suggest that there are large differences between Finnish accounting standards (FAS) and IFRS anticipating extra audit risk and work at the accounting move. Therefore, it is highly likely that extensive supply for audit and non-audit services during the transition from FAS to IFRS would occur. When taking into account several control variables, in line with prior research, our analyses based on unique, hand-collected data provide evidence that a company with a high FAS-IFRS disparity is associated with more costly non-audit services during the transition phase than one with low disparity. Furthermore, the results reveal that audit fees, where audit markets are more competitive, are not significantly related to the magnitude of IFRS adjustments. Overall, the research findings inform, among other things, audit firms and their clients about the type and the level of costs incurred during a major accounting change.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: audit supply, non-audit fees, audit fees, IFRS, transition
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M42 - Auditing

References

Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. An empirical investigation of audit fees, nonaudit fees, and audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20, 215-234.

Abdel-Khalik, A. R. 1990. The jointness of audit fees and demand for MAS: A self-selection analysis, Contemporary Accounting Research, 6, 295-322.

Adams, C. A., P. Weetman, E. A. E. Jones, and S. J. Gray. 1999. Reducing the burden of US GAAP reconciliations by foreign countries listed in the United States: the key question of materiality, European Accounting Review, 8, 1-22.

Airaksinen, M., P. Pulkkinen, and V. Rasinaho. 2007. Osakeyhtiölaki I [Corporate Law I], Helsinki: Talentum.

Alexander, D. 2006. Legal certainty, European-ness and realpolitik. Accounting in Europe, 3, 65-80.

Antle, R., E. Gordon, G. Narayanamoorthy, and L. Zhou. 2006. The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 27, 235-266.

Arens, A. A., and J. K. Loebbecke. 1994. Auditing: an Integrated Approach (6th edn), London: Prentice Hall.

Ball, R. 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research 36 (Special issue), 5-27.

Bell, T.B., W. R. Landsman, and D. A. Shackelford. 2001. Auditors’ perceived business risk and audit fees: analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research , 39, 35- 43.

Camaran, M. 2005. Audit fees and the large auditor premium in the Italian market, International Journal of Auditing, 9, 129-146.

Chung, S., and R. Narasimhan. 2002. An international study of crosssectional variations in audit fees, International Journal of Auditing, 6, 79-91.

Cobbin, P. E. 2002. International dimensions of the audit fee determinants literature, International Journal of Auditing,6, 53-77.

Committee of European Securities Regulators. 2003a. European regulation on the application of IFRS in 2005; Recommendation for additional guidance regarding the transition to IFRS. Ref: CERS/03-323e.

Committee of European Securities Regulators. 2003b. Standard no. 1 on financial information. enforcement on standards on financial information in Europe, March. http://www.europefesco.org.

Corbin J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd edn), Los Angeles: Sage.

Corporate governance recommendation for listed companies. 2003. A publication by the Helsinki Stock Exchange, the Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland, and Confederation of Finnish Industries. www.keskuskauppakamari.fi/kkk/julkaisuja/publications/en_GB/corporate_governance/.

Corporate Governance Working Group. 2004. Corporate governance recommendation for listed companies. 2004. HEX Plc, Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland, Confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers. www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/recommendation_en_final.pdf.

Craswell, A. T. 1999. Does the provision of non-audit services impair auditor independence? International Journal of Auditing, 3, 29-40.

Davis, L. R., D. N. Ricchiute, and G. Trompeter. 1993. Audit effort, audit fees, and the provision of nonaudit services to audit clients, The Accounting Review, 68, 135-150.

DeBerg, C. L., S. E. Kaplan, and K. Pany. 1991. An examination of some relationships between non-audit services and audit change, Accounting Horizons, 5, 17-28.

Ding, Y., O.-K. Hope, T. Jeanjean, and H. Stolowy. 2007. Differences between domestic accounting standards and IAS: Measurement, determinants and implications. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26:1, 1-38.

European Parliament and Council. 2002. Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l26040.htm.

Ezzamel, M., D. R. Gwilliam, and K. M. Holland. 1996. Some empirical evidence from publicly quoted UK companies on the relationship between the pricing of audit and non-audit services, Accounting and Business Research, 27:1, 3–16.

Financial Supervision Authority. 2005. FIN-FSA’s study on IFRS transition (in Finnish only, Selvitys listayhtiöiden IFRS-siirtymätiedottamisen laadusta ja siirtymän vaikutuksista. Working paper. Financial Supervision Authority. Market monitoring.

Financial Supervision Authority. 2006. Selvitys listayhtiöiden vuoden 2005 IFRS-tilinpäätöksistä. (in Finnish, press release in English Listed companies' IFRS financial statements still need developing http://www.fin-fsa.fi/Eng/FIN-FSA_News/Press_releases/9_2006.htm). Working paper. Financial Supervision Authority. Market monitoring.

Firth, M. 1997. The provision of non-audit services and the pricing of audit fees. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 3&4, 511-525.

Firth, M. 2002. Auditor-provided consultancy services and their association with audit fees and audit opinions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 5&6, 661-693.

Francis, J. R. and D. T. Simon. 1987. A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review, 62:1, 145-157.

Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K.K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77, 71-105.

Fredriksson, A. 2009. Interview with the author on 14 Sep 2009.

Geiger, M. A., and D. V. Rama. 2003. Audit fees, non-audit fees and auditor reporting on stressed companies, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22:2, 53–69.

Glaum, M., and D. L. Street. 2003. Compliance with the disclosure requirements of Germany's New Market: IAS versus U.S. GAAP. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 14:1, 64-74.

Griffin, P. A., and D. H. Lont. 2007. An analysis of audit fees following the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 14:2, 161–192.

Griffin, P. A., D. H. Lont, and Y. Sun. 2009. Governance regulatory changes, International Financial Reporting Standards adoption, and New Zealand audit and non-audit fees: empirical evidence. Accounting and Finance, 49:4, 697-724.

Hackenbrack, K., and W. R. Knechel. 1997. Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements, Contemporary Accounting Research; 14, 481-499.

Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics., Econometrica. 46: 1251-1271.

Haller, A. 2002. Financial accounting developments in the European Union: past events and future prospects, European Accounting Review, 11, 153-190.

Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23, 141-191.

Hodgdon, C., R. H. Tondkar, A. Adhikari, and D. W. Harless. 2009. Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards and auditor choice: New evidence on the importance of the statutory audit. The International Journal of Accounting, 44, 33-55.

Hoogendoorn, M. 2006. International accounting regulation and IFRS implementation in Europe and beyond–experiences with first-time adoption in Europe, Accounting in Europe, 3, 23-26.

Hope, O.-K. 2003. Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts’ forecast accuracy: an international study. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 235-272.

Horton, J., and G. Serafeim. 2008. Market reaction to and valuation of IFRS reconciliation adjustments: first evidence from the UK. Working paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=923582.

Hung, M., and K. R. Subramanyam. 2007. Financial Statement Effects of Adopting International Accounting Standards: The Case of Germany. Review of Accounting Studies 12, 623-657.

ICAEW. 2004. Auditing implications of IFRS transition. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Technical releases, April 03/04. Audit and Assurance Faculty. London.

IFAC. 2008. Handbook of international auditing, assurance, and ethics pronouncements. International Federation of Accountants. http://www.ifac.org.

Jermakowicz, E. K., and S. Gornik-Tomaszewski. 2006. Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 15:2, 170-196.

Joshi, P. L., and H. Al-Bastaki. 2000. Determinants of audit fees: evidence from the companies listed in Bahrain. International Journal of Auditing, 4, 129-138.

Kallunki, J.-P., P. Sahlström, and M. Zerni. 2007. Propensity to switch auditors and strictness of legal liability environment: The role of audit mispricing. International Journal of Auditing, 11, 165-185.

Kane, G. D, and N. L. Meade. 1998. Ratio analysis using rank transformation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 10, 59-74.

Kettunen, P. 1993. Financial accounting and reporting in Finland. European Accounting Review, 2:3, 592–602.

Kinnunen, J., J. Niskanen, and E. Kasanen. 2000. To whom are IAS earnings informative? Domestic versus foreign shareholders’ perspectives. The European Accounting Review, 9, 499-517.

KPMG. 2002. Implementing IAS. IAS compared with US GAAP and Finnish GAAP. KPMG International, Switzerland.

KPMG. 2003. Implementing IAS. Extract from IAS compared with US GAAP and Finnish GAAP.

KPMG International, Switzerland KPMG. 2006. IFRS-artikkelikokoelma. IFRSview. Audit, tax advisory. August. KPMG.

KPMG. 2009. IFRS Advisory Services. http://www.kpmg.fi/page.aspx?Section=1305&Item=2694.

Leuz, C. 2003. IAS Versus U.S. GAAP: Information asymmetry-based evidence from Germany’s new market. Journal of Accounting Research, 41:3, 445-472.

Leuz, C., and R. E. Verrecchia. 2001. The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20, 129-153.

Levitt, A. 2000. Renewing the covenant with investors, Speech at the New York University Center for Law and Business (May 10, available at http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch370.htm).

Marden, R. E., and K. S. Brackney. 2009. Audit risk and IFRS. CPA Journal, 79:6, 32-36.

Miettinen, J. 2008. The effect of audit quality on the relationship between audit committee effectiveness and financial reporting quality. Acta Wasaensia no 197. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino.

Miihkinen, A. 2008. Efficiency of authoritative disclosure recommendations: Evidence from IFRS transition disclosure in Finland. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 16:4, 384-413.

Ministry of Trade and Industry. 2003a. IAS supervision. Proposal of the MTI Working Group for the organisation of the supervision of the compliance of the financial information with the International Accounting Standards (IAS) in Finland. Ad hoc committee reports 7/2003 [English summary]. Helsinki: Edita.

Ministry of Trade and Industry. 2003b. Final report by the IAS working group. Ad hoc committee reports 9/2003 [English summary]. Helsinki: Edita.

Moizer, P. 1997. Auditor reputation: The international empirical evidence, International Journal of Auditing 1, 61-74.

Niemi, L. 2002. Do firms pay for audit risk? Evidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort. International Journal of Auditing, 6, 37-51.

Niemi, L. 2005. Audit effort and fees under concentrated client ownership: Evidence from four international audit firms, The International Journal of Accounting, 40, 303– 323.

Nikkinen, J., and P. Sahlström. 2005. Risk in audit pricing: the role of different dimensions of risk. Advances in International Accounting, 18, 141-151.

Nobes, C. W. 2006. Revenue recognition and EU endorsement of IFRS, Accounting in Europe, 3, 81-89.

O’Keefe, T.B., D.A. Simunic, and M.T. Stein. 1994. The production of audit services: evidence from a major public accounting firm, Journal of Accounting Research, 32:2, 241-261.

Pajamo, P. 2009. Interview with the author at the KPMG office on 2 Oct 2009 between 09.00-11.00.

Palmrose, Z.-V. 1986. The effect of nonaudit services on the pricing of audit services: Further evidence Journal of Accounting Research, 24, 405-411.

Patel, A., V. S. Varma, and P. Prasad. 2009. Provision of non-audit services, low balling, audit tenure and auditor type. ICFAI University Journal of Audit Practice, 6:1, pp. 62-70.

Penman, S. 2001. Financial statement analysis and security valuation. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Pirinen, P. 2005. Economic and normative pressures as drivers for the adoption of international accounting standards in Finland since 1976. European Accounting Review, 14:1, 213-235.

Pong, C. M., and G. Whittington. 1994. The determinants of audit fees: some empirical models. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21:8, 1071-1095.

Pratt, J., and J. D. Stice. 1994. The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees, The Accounting Review, 69, 639-656.

PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2004a. International financial reporting standards, ready to take the plunge, (May). http://www.pwc.com/pl/eng/ins-sol/publ/2004/ifrs_survey06.pdf.

PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2004b. Adopting IFRS, (June). http://www.pwc.com/ifrs.

Rawlings, J. O. 1988. Applied regression analysis: a research tool. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks.

Rees, R. 1995. Financial analysis. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Great Britain.

Reynolds, J.-K., D. E. Deis, and J. R. Francis. 2004. Professional service fees and auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23:1, 29-52.

Räty, P. 1992. Reforming Finnish accounting legislation. European Accounting Review, 1:2, 413–20.

Salmi, T. 1996. A comparative review of the Finnish Expenditure-Revenue accounting. Based on working paper 78-2. European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, Jan 1978. Rewritten for electronic publication in 1993. Technically revised in 1996. http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/comp/comp.html.

Schadewitz, H., and M. Vieru. 2006. Relevance and sufficiency of pre-reporting: transition of Finnish small and medium-sized listed companies to IFRS. Working paper. Available at SSRN.

SEC. 2000. Hearing on auditor independence. September 21, 2000. http://www.sec.gov/rules/extra/audmin4.htm.

SEC. 2007. SEC Takes Action to improve consistency of disclosure to U.S. investors in foreign companies. http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-235.htm.

Sharma, D. S., and J. Sidhu. 2001. Professionalism vs. commercialism: the association between non-audit services (NAS) and audit Independence, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 28, 5 & 6, 595–629.

Sharpe, W. 1964. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of Finance 19, 425-442.

Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, 18:1, 161-190.

Simunic, D. A. 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence’, Journal of Accounting Research, 22:2, 679–702.

Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1996. The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15, 120-134.

Solomon, I. 1990. Discussion of ‘The jointness of audit fees and demand for MAS: a self-selection analysis’’, Contemporary Accounting Research, 6:1, 323–28.

Street, D. L., S. J. Gray, and S. M. Bryant. 1999. Acceptance and observance of International Accounting Standards: An empirical study of companies claiming to comply with IASs. The International Journal of Accounting, 34:1, 11-48.

Street, D. L., N. B. Nichols, and S. J. Gray. 2000. Assessing the acceptability of international accounting standards in the US: An empirical study of the materiality of US GAAP reconciliations by non-US companies complying with IASC standards, The Journal of International Accounting, 35, 27-63.

Street, D. L., and S. M. Bryant. 2000. Disclosure level and compliance with IASs: A comparison of companies with and without U.S. listings and filings. The International Journal of Accounting, 35:3, 305-329.

Tarca, A. 2004. International convergence of accounting practices: Choosing between IAS and US GAAP. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 15:1, 60-91.

Taylor, M. H., and D.T. Simon. 1999. Determinants of audit fees: the importance of litigation, disclosure, and regulatory burdens in audit engagements in 20 countries, The International Journal of Accounting, 34, 375-388.

Ucieda Blanco, J. L., and B. García Osma. 2004. The comparability of international accounting standards and US GAAP: An empirical study of Form 20-F reconciliations, International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 1, 5-36.

Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees, Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 721-744.

White, H. 1980. A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica ,48, 817-838.

Wu, J. S. 2008. Discussion of “Will harmonizing accounting standards really harmonize accounting? Evidence from non-U.S. firms adopting U.S. GAAP”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23:2, 265-270.