Use of contingent valuation to assess farmer preference for on-farm conservation of minor millets: case from South India

Raghu, Prabhakaran T. and Das, Sukanya and S, Bala Ravi and E.D.I, Oliver King (2012): Use of contingent valuation to assess farmer preference for on-farm conservation of minor millets: case from South India. Published in: Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics , Vol. 3, No. 67 (2012): pp. 294-307.

Abstract

Smallholder farmers all over the world, particularly in regions of rich agro-biodiversity contribute to on-farm conservation. Past and present agricultural progress could not have happened neither without these genetic resources nor the associated farmer knowledge. Six species of minor millets are grown in India on more than 2 million hectares. The Kolli Hills in Tamil Nadu has been a region where five of these millet species have been under cultivation over the last several hundred years. These minor millets are currently under threat due to high competition from tapioca (cassava) as well as easy access to PDS rice at low cost. Over last three decades there has been decline in the millet area and number of farmers cultivating these species. It is in this context that this study attempts to examine the role of farmer incentive mechanisms to conserve minor millets in Kolli Hills. The millet varieties existing in the study area were classified either as most preferred varieties (MPVs) or least preferred varieties (LPVs) by the farmer respondents based on their yield and consumption preferences. The farmer willingness to accept compensation to participate in the conservation programme is estimated using a contingent valuation method (CVM). Seemingly unrelated bivariate probit regression was used to estimate the determinants of willing to participate in on-farm conservation of minor millets. The result shows that the impact of bid value is significant and positive to participate in the on-farm millet conservation of MPVs. The farmers participating is millet related organization are willing to accept lower compensation for MPVs and higher for LPVs compared to farmers who are not participating in such organization.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Agro-biodiversity, contingent valuation method, food security, neglected and underutilized crops, willingness to accept
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation

References

Birol, E., E.R. Villalba and M. Smale (2007), Farmer Preferences for Milpa Diversity and Genetically Modified Maize in Mexico: A Latent Class Approach, IFPRI Discussion Paper 726, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Birol, E., E.R. Villalba and M. Smale (2009), “Farmer Preferences for Milpa Diversity and Genetically Modified Maize in Mexico: A Latent Class Approach”, Environment and Development Economics,Cambridge University Press, Vol. 14, No.4, pp.521-540.

Desaigues, B. and D. Ami (2001), “An Estimation of The Social Benefits of Preserving Biodiversity”,Int. Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Vol. 1, No.1, pp.73-86.

Dupraz, P., D. Vermersch, B. Henry De Frahan and L. Delvaux (2003), “The Environmental Supply of Farm Households: A Flexible Willingness to Accept Model”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 25, pp.171-189.

Freeman, A.M. (2002), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Gruere, G.P., L. Nagarajan and E.D.I.O. King (2007), Marketing Underutilised Plant Species for the Poor: A Case Study of Minor Millets in Kolli Hills, Tamil Nadu, India, Report published by the Global Facilitation Unit for Underutilised Species (GFU), Bioversity International, Rome, Italy.

Gruere, G.P., L. Nagarajan and E.D.I.O. King (2007) Collective Action and Marketing of Underutilised Plant Species: The Case of Minor Millets in Kolli Hills, Tamil Nadu, India, CAPRi Working Paper 69.

Gruere, G.P, L. Nagarajan and E.D.I.O. King (2009) “The Role of Collective Action in The Marketing of Underutilised Plant Species: Lessons From A Case Study on Minor Millets in South India”,Food Policy, Vol. 34, No.1, pp.39-45.

Horna, J.D., M. Smale and M. Von-Oppen, (2005), Farmer Willingness to Pay for Seed-Related Information: Rice Varieties in Nigeria and Benin, EPTD Discussion Papers 142, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

King, E.D.I.O., V.A. Nambi and L. Nagarajan (2009), “Integrated Approaches in Small Millets Conservation: A Case From Kolli Hills, India”, International Society for Horticulture Science, Vol.806, Vol.(2), pp.79–84.

Kumaran, M. (2004), “Assessment of Development Interventions of M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation in Kolli Hills Using Geographical Information Systems”, Dissertation, Department of Rural Development, Gandhigram Rural Institute – Deemed University, Gandhigram, (Tamil Nadu).

Kumar-Range, S. (2001), Like Paddy in Rock: Local Institutions and Gender Roles in Kolli Hills, M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF), Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF), (2002), Rural and Tribal Women in Agrobiodiversity Conservation, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) RAP Publication 2002/08, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nagarajan, L., E.D.I.O. King, M. Smale and T.J. Dalton (2010), “Access to Minor Millet Genetic Resources in Rural Market Towns of Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India”, in L. Lipper, C. L. Anderson and T. J. Dalton (Eds.) (2010), Seed Trade in Rural Markets: Implications for Crop Diversity and Agricultural Development, pp. 125-149.

Narloch, U., A.G. Drucker and U. Pascual (2011a), “Payments for Agrobiodiversity Conservation Services for Sustained On-Farm Utilisation of Plant and Animal Genetic Resources”, Ecological Economics, Vol.70, pp. 1837-1845.

Narloch, U., U. Pascual A.G. Drucker (2011b), “Cost-Effectiveness Targeting Under Multiple Conservation Goals and Equity Considerations in the Andes”, Environmental Conservation, Vol.38, No.4, pp. 417-425.

Ndjeunga, J. and C.H. Nelson (2005), “Toward Understanding Household Preference for Consumption Characteristics of Millet Varieties: A Case Study from Western Niger”, Agricultural Economics,Vol. 32, No.2, pp.151-165.

Pearce, D.W. and D. Moran (2001), Handbook on the Applied Valuation of Biological Diversity, Report prepared for Environment Directorate, OECD, Paris.

Pradeep, V. and J. Rajasekeran (2006), Classification and Characterisation of Self Help Groups (SHG’s) Enterprises in Kolli Hills Developed by MSSRF, Report submitted for Master of Arts in Social Works, Department of Social Work, The American College, Madurai, Unpublished.

Scarpa, R., A. Drucker, S. Anderson, N. Ferraes-Ehuan, V. Gomez, C.R. Risopatron and O. Rubio-Leonel (2003a), “Valuing Animal Genetic Resources in Peasant Economies: The Case of the Box Keken Creole Pig in Yucatan”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 45, No.3. pp. 427- 443.

Scarpa R., E.S.K. Ruto, P. Kristjanson, M. Radeny, A.G. Drucker and J.E.O. Rege (2003b), “Valuing Indigenous Cattle Breeds in Kenya: An Empirical Comparison of Stated and Revealed Preference Value Estimates”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 45, No.3, pp.409-426.

Swanson, T. and A. Kontoleon (2000), “Why Did the Protected Areas Fail the Giant Panda? The Economics of Conserving Endangered Species in Developing Countries”, World Economics, Vol.1, No.4, pp.135-148.

Wale, E., A.G. Drucker and K.K. Zander (2011), The Economics of Managing Crop Diversity On-farm:Case-Studies from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative, Earthscan Publications.