Building a New World: An Ecosystemic Approach for Global Change & Development Design

Pilon, André Francisco (2013): Building a New World: An Ecosystemic Approach for Global Change & Development Design.

Abstract

Problems of difficult settlement or solution in the world cannot be solved by segmented academic formats, market-place interests or mass-media headlines; instead of dealing with taken for granted issues (the apparent “bubbles” in the surface), public policies, research and teaching programmes should detect the issues and deal with them deep inside the boiling pot. Policy discussions and policy making require new paradigms of growth, power, wealth, work and freedom embedded into the cultural, social, political and economical institutions (more critical than individual motives and morals). Urban planning cannot be subordinated to the interests of business corporations, cities cannot remain as privileged centers for profit and capital accumulation, transforming citizens in mere users and consumers, but must preserve and develop mankind heritage, encompassing history, values, architecture, landscapes, the arts, the letters. Being-in-the-world is more than living on it, it demands an ecosystemic approach, the construction of a new social fabric, as new structures emerge in the socio-cultural learning niches and develop critical capacities to operate changes in the system. Problem solving implies dynamic and complex configurations intertwining four dimensions of being-in-the-world, as they combine, as donors and recipients, to induce the events (deficits and assets), cope with consequences (desired or undesired) and contribute for change (diagnosis and prognosis): intimate (subject’s cognitive and affective processes), interactive (groups’ mutual support and values), social (political, economical and cultural systems) and biophysical (biological endowment, natural and man-made environments). An integrated ecosystemic approach to education, culture, environment, health, politics, economics and quality of life should develop the connections and seal the ruptures between the different dimensions of being-in-the-world, in view of their mutual support and dynamic equilibrium.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: culture, politics, economics, environment, ecosystems, education
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General > I00 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

ACKOFF, R. L. Differences That Make a Difference: An annotated glossary of distinctions important in management. Triarchy Press, Axminster, 2010.

AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOC., Bringing the Past into the Present. 104th Annual Meeting, Washington, 2005.

ASHLEY, P. A. and CROWTHER, D. Territories of Social Responsibility. Opening the Research and Policy Agenda, Gower Publ., Surrey, 2012.

BAIOCCHI, G. The Citizens of Porto Alegre. Boston Review, March/April 2005. [online]: http://bostonreview.net/BR31.2/baiocchi.html

BECK, U. Cosmopolitan Vision, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007.

BEDFORD, T. Parliament Committee on Environmental Audit. United Kingdom, 2002. [online]: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmenvaud/472/3022702.htm

BINSWANGER, L. Being-in-the-World: Selected Papers of Ludwig Binswanger. Condor Books, London, 1963.

BOOKCHIN, M. The Ecology of Freedom. Knopf, New York, 1982.

BOOKCHIN, M. Limits of the City Black Rose Books, Montreal, 1996.

BOOSTROM, R. Teaching by the Numbers, in Burbules, N. C. and Hansen, D. T. Teaching and its Predicaments. Westview Press, Boulder, 1997: 45-64.

BOWN, L. What do we Mean by Development? Development Education Centre [Birmingham] and Educating and Acting for a Better World [Ireland], 2007 [online]: http://www.developmenteducation.ie/files/resources/What.pdf

BROWN, P. G. and Garver, G Right Relationship: Building a Whole Earth Economy, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, 2009.

BUELL, F. From Apocalypse to Way of Life: Environmental Crisis in the American Century; Routledge, 2003.

CHERMAYEFF, S. & TZONIS, A. Shape of Community, Realization of Human Potential. Middlesex, Penguim Books, 1971.

COLEMAN, J. The Asymmetric Society, New York, Syracuse University Press, 1985.

DIETZ, T., The Art of Influence, Nature, 479:176: 2011

DOUGLAS, M. Natural symbols: explorations in cosmology, Routledge, New York, 1996

DRENGSON, A. The Practice of Technology: Exploring Technology, Ecophilosophy, and Spiritual Disciplines for Vital Links. Suny, Albany, 1995.

ELOHIM, J. L. The Performance of the World System. A Critical Viewpoint in Parra-Luna, F. The Performance of Social Systems: Perspectives and Problems. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000.

ETZIONI, A., Toward a New Socio-Economic Paradigm, Socio-Economic Review, 1, (1) 105-118: 2003). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2157130

EWALD, F. Le retour du malin genie. Ésquisse d’une philosophie de la précaution. In Godard, O. and Long, M. Le principe de précaution dans la conduite des affaires humaines. Association NSS-Dialogues. Editions Quae, 1997.

FORTUIN, K. P. J. et al. The European Workshop: a course aimed at educating students to cross boundaries. Engineering Education in Sustainable Development (EESD) Conference, Graz, 2008 [online]: http://www.esa.wur.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B2FA6130-462D-43BF-8D67-B797439AA538/70366/030908_paper_Fortuin_Bush_Henriksen.pdf

FLYVBJERG, B. et al. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge University Press, 2003.

FRANTZESKAKI, N. and Loorbach, D. A transition research perspective on governance for sustainability, Sustainable Development: A Challenge for European Research Conference, Brussels, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/research/sd/conference/2009/papers/9/derk_loorbach_and_niki_frantzeskaki__transition_research.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none

GADAMER, H. G. Philosophical hermeneutics. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1977.

GIDDENS, A. The Global Third Way Debate.: Polity Press, Cambridge, 2001.

HANNIGAN, J A Environmental sociology, a social constructionist perspective. Routledge, London, New York, 1995. HARVEY, D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, 2005.

HARVEY, D. Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Verso, 2006.

HELD, D. Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity, 2004.

HUGONNIER, B. Education For Sustainable Development in OECD Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. Workshop on Education for Sustainable Education, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2008 [online]: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/39/12/41308608.pdf

HUPPES, G. Eco-efficiency: From focused technical tools to reflective sustainability analysis. Ecological Economics, 68 (6), 2009: 1572-1574.

IRISH AID Development Education: an Introduction. Irish Foreign Office Publication, 2007 [online]: http://www.irishaid.gov.ie/Uploads/Irish%20Aid%20and%20Development%20Education.pdf

JONES, N. A. et al. Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods, Ecology and Society, (16) 1; 46, 2011 [online]: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/

KAHAN, D.M. et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Clim. Change, 2, 732–735, 2012.

KASSER, T., & Ryan, R. M. Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280-287, 1996.

KLINTMAN, M. Citizen-Consumers and Evolution: Reducing Environmental Harm through our Social Motivation, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

KROL, G.-J. Environmental problems, morals and incentives in modern societies. Institute of Economic Education, University of Münster, 2005 [online]: http://www.wiwi.unimuenster.de/ioeb/downloads/forschen/Krol/EnvironmentalProblems.pdf

KULL, K. On Semiosis, Umwelt, and Semiosphere. Semiotica, 3/4 (120), 1998: 299-310 [on line]: http://www.zbi.ee/~kalevi/jesphohp.htm

LABONTE, R. 2004. Social inclusion/exclusion: dancing the dialectic. Health Promotion International, 19 (1): 115-121.

LAYZER, J. A. The Environmental Case: Translating Values into Policy. Sustaining Cities: Environment, Economic Development, and Empowerment Conference. MIT Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2008 [on line]: http://mitworld.mit.edu/stream/572/

LEFEBVRE, H. The Urban Revolution, University of Minnesota Press, 2003

LIND, G., The meaning and measurement of moral judgement competence revisited - A dual-aspect model. In: D. Fasko & W. Willis, Eds. Contemporary Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives on Moral Development and Education. Hampton Press, Cresskill, 2003.

LINDBERG, C. The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. UNECE High-Level Meeting of Environment and Education Ministries, Vilnius, 2005. [online]: http://www.unece.org/env/esd/HLM.intervent/UNESCO.Carl.doc

MARCH, J. G. and. Olsen, J. P. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics, Free Press, 1989.

MASON, M. The Governance of Transnational Environmental Harm: Addressing New Modes of Accountability/Responsibility. Global Environmental Politics (8) 3: 8-24, 2008.

MASSUMI, B. A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 2003.

MAX-NEEF, M. A. Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections, New York, Apex Press, 1991.

MEISEL, N. Governance Culture and Development: A different Perspective on Corporate Governance, OECD Development Centre Study, Paris, 2004.

NELSON, R. R. Evolutionary Theories of Cultural Change: An Empirical Perspective. Columbia University, 2005 [online]: http://etss.net/files/Nelson_Cultural_Change.pdf

NONAKA, I. and Konno, N. The concept of "Ba’: Building foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review (40) 3, 1998.

NORTH, D., Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.

O’ SULLIVAN, P. E. Environment science and environment philosophy. The Int’l J. of Environment Studies, 28; 257-267, 1987.

ORHAN, O. Three Modes of Environmental Justice in World Politics. The annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Aug 27, 2003 [online]: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62643_index.html

ORR, D. Earth in Mind, Island Press, 1994.

PILON, A. F. The Bubbles or the Boiling Pot? An Ecosystemic Approach to Culture, Environment and Quality of Life. Environmental Geology, 57 (2) 2009. [online]: http://www.springerlink.com/content/w6l306m214813077

PILON, A. F. Living Better in a Better World: Development and Sustainability in the Ecosystemic Model of Culture. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2 (4): 25-36, 2010 [on line]: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1713371

PLUMWOOD, V. The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Routledge, New York and London, 2002. RICHMOND, B. The ‘‘Thinking’’ in Systems Thinking: Seven Essential Skills. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications, 2000.

ROBBINS, P. Political Ecology: a Critical Introduction. Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

ROTMANS, J. and Loorbach, D. Complexity and Transition Management, Journal of Industrial Ecology (13) 2: 184-196, 2009.

SASSEN, S. Cities are at the center of our environmental future, S.A.P.I.EN.S, (2) 3, 2010, [online]: http://sapiens.revues.org/index948.html.

SCHEFFER, M. et al., Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413: 591-596, 2001.

SOSKOLNE, C.L. Ethical, Social, and Legal Issues Surrounding Studies of Susceptible Populations and Individuals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 145 supplement 4, 1977

STERLING, S. Whole Systems Thinking as a Basis for Paradigm Change in Education: Explorations in the Context of Sustainability. Doctoral Thesis, University of Bath, 2003. [online]: http://www.bath.ac.uk/cree/sterling/sterlingtitle.pdf

STERLING, S. ‘Mission impossible’ - or ‘never ending story’? CREE seminar University of Bath, 2009 [on line]: http://www.bath.ac.uk/cree/seminars/BathSterlingJuly09.ppt

SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE CONFERENCE, Culture and the Making of Worlds, Università Bocconi, 2010 [on line]: http://www.esaculturebocconi2010.org/the-conference/the-theme.html

SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS RESEARCH NETWORK, Mission Statement, 2010 [on line]: http://www.transitionsnetwork.org/files/STRN_research_agenda_20_August_2010(2).pdf

TILBURY, D. et al. A National Review of Environmental Education and its Contribution to Sustainability in Australia. Australian Dept. of the Environment and Heritage and Research Institute in Education for Sustainability, Canberra, 2005 [online]: http://www.aries.mq.edu.au/pdf/Volume2_brochure.pdf

TAKASHI, M. Diversity, Trans-disciplinarity and Sustainability Science Education. The 2nd International Conference on Sustainability Science – ICSS, Rome, 2010 [on line]: http://icss2010.net/download/documents/24-JUNE/Sessione-5_Sustainability-science-education/3_T-Mino.pdf

THROSBY, D. Linking Cultural and Ecological Sustainability. The International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, (8), 1: 15-20, 2008.

TRAINER, F.E. Where are we, where do we want to be, how do we get there?: The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy .(6), 2, 2000 [on line]: http://www.inclusivedemocracy.org/dn/vol6/trainer_where.htm

TRAINER, F.E. Natural Capitalism Cannot Overcome Resource Limit Minnesotans For Sustainability, 2001 [on line]: http://www.mnforsustain.org/trainer_fe_simon_lovins_critique.htm

UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, 2008 [on line]: http://www.eolss.net/

UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY, Website on Sustainable Development Governance, 2010: http://www.ias.unu.edu/sub_page.aspx?catID=155&ddlID=17

VIRILIO, P. and TURNER, C. The Information Bomb, Verso, 2005.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The Modern World-System, New York, Academic Press, 1974.

WHITE H., Figural Realism, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1999.

WHITTON, H. Teaching ethics in highly corrupt societies: Concerns and opportunities. Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. 2009 [on line]: http://www.cmi.no/publications/file/?3345=teaching-ethics-in-highly-corrupt-societies

WILCOX, L. S. Onions and bubbles: models of the social determinants of health. Prev Chronic Dis 2007; 4 (4). [on line]: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/oct/07_0126.htm

YANG, M: Introduction, International Conference on Architecture and Cities for the 21st Century, Valencia, 1998. [online]: http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-489-1.pdf

ZNANIECKI, F. Ludzie terazniejsi a cywilizacja przyszlosci (The People of Today and the Civilization of Tomorrow), Ksiaznica Atlas, Lwow, Poland, 1935.