Pohit, Sanjib (2012): Complementarity and Potentials of High Technology Trade, Technology and Skills Transfers between India-Russia.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_45866.pdf Download (178kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines complementarities and potentialities in merchandise trade in general and high technology trade in particular between India and Russia. In this context, we have also looked at the complementarities for bilateral transfer of investment, technology and skills. The analysis shows that bilateral trade flow is small even though trade complementarities in the segment of high technology as well as in merchandise trade in general exist. Inefficient trade logistics networks, absence of mutual recognition of standard, lack of bilateral technology and skill transfer and low level of connectivity between private sectors of either country are some of the factors responsible for not realising the potentials of trade. This is further confirmed by our illustrative CGE modelling exercise which suggest about half a percentage points increase in real GNP in either country if bilateral tariff barriers are abolished. In this context, governments of Russia and India need to play pro-active role to raise the level of economic engagement
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Complementarity and Potentials of High Technology Trade, Technology and Skills Transfers between India-Russia |
English Title: | Complementarity and Potentials of High Technology Trade, Technology and Skills Transfers between India-Russia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | India, Russia, High Technology, CGE model, Trade |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration |
Item ID: | 45866 |
Depositing User: | Professor Sanjib Pohit |
Date Deposited: | 05 Apr 2013 15:39 |
Last Modified: | 16 Oct 2019 07:32 |
References: | 1. Badri Narayanan G. and Terrie L. Walmsley, (Ed). Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 7 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University. 2008. 2. Balassa, B. 1965. “Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage.” The Manchester School, 33, 99-123. 3. Hertel. T. W. (Ed). Global Trade analysis: Modelling and Applications. Cambridge University Press. 1997. 4. Hatzichronoglou, Thomas. 1997. “Revisions of the High Technology Sector and Product Classification,” OECD/GD(97)216, Paris, OECD. 5. Mani, Sunil. 2004. “Exports of High Technology Products from Developing Countries: Are the figures real or are they statistical artefacts,” in Mani, Sunil and HennyRomijn (ed.) Innovation, Learning and Technological Dynamism of Developing Countries, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 12-47. 6. Mani, Sunil. 2010. “India,” in UNESCO Science Report, pp. 363-377, UNESCO Publishing Paris. 7. Meri, Thomas. 2008. “Trade in High Tech Products: Statistics in focus,” Science and Technology, July. 8. Pohit, Sanjib. 2009. “Trends in High-Technology Trade,” in Banerjee, P. (ed.) India Science & Technology 2009, published by NISTADS (CSIR), pp. 131-134. 9. Pohit, Sanjib. 2011. “High Technology Merchandise Trade: Where do India Stands?” NISTADS, unpublished mimeo. 10. Sinha Roy, Saikat. 2004. “Complementarities and Potentials of Intra-regional Transfers of Investments, Technology and Skills in Asia.” RIS Discussion Paper, No. 79/2004. 11. Sen, Amit. 2011. Economic Times, 15-16 June. 12. WTO. 1996. Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres96_e/pr057_e.htm. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/45866 |