Information technology, organizational change and firm productivity: A panel study of complementarity effects and clustering patterns in Manufacturing and Services

Zand, Fardad and Van Beers, Cees and Van Leeuwen, George (2011): Information technology, organizational change and firm productivity: A panel study of complementarity effects and clustering patterns in Manufacturing and Services.

Abstract

Organizational complementarities are an essential factor in the process of creating business value from information technology (IT) investments. Organizational change (OC) is an important complementarity. This paper investigates complementarities between IT capital and OC initiatives of the firm. It analyzes the productivity impact of different clusters of IT and OC in the manufacturing and services sectors of the economy. Three dimensions of OC are studied: process, structure, and boundary changes. Two distinct econometric approaches are applied to a unique and detailed sample of 32,619 firm-level observations in the Netherlands for the period 1994-2006. The results reveal that the productivity effect of IT significantly increases when technology investments are accompanied by relevant organizational changes. The observed complementarity effects between IT and OC are stronger for services than for manufacturing firms. The effects become stronger if different types of change are combined with each other and form clusters. In contrast to IT capital, non-IT capital and OC exhibit a substitutability relationship. As to another finding of the research, IT seems to play a dual role with respect to change: generating or stimulating it and complementing or supporting it. The first role is more dominant among manufacturing, while the second is among services firms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Information Technology, Organizational Change, Firm Productivity, Complementarities, Clusters, Manufacturing, Services.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

References

Acemoglu, D., D. Autor. 2011. Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings.in Handbook of Labor Economics, O. Ashenfelter and D. E. Card (eds.), Volume 4. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam (forthcoming).

Alavi, M., D. E. Leidner. 2001. Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly 25(1) 107-136.

Amit, R., P. Schoemaker. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14 33-46.

Aral, S., P. Weill. 2007. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science 18(5) 763-780.

Armbruster, H., A. Bikfalvi, S. Kinkel, G. Lay. 2008. Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation 28 644–657.

Arvanitis, S. 2005. Computerization, Workplace Organization, Skilled Labor and Firm Productivity: Evidence for the Swiss Business Sector. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14(4) 225-249.

Athey, S., S. Stern. 1998. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER and SSRN Working Paper.

Bahrami, H. 1992. The emerging flexible organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley. California Management Review 34(4) 33-52.

Bartel, A., C. Ichniowski, K. Shaw. 2007. How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(4) 1721-1758.

Barua, A., C. H. Kriebel, T. Mukhopadhyay. 1995. Information Technologies and Business Value-an Analytic and Empirical Investigation. Information Systems Research 6 3-23.

Beers, van C., F. Zand. 2010. R&D Cooperation, Partner Diversity and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Analysis. DRUID Working Paper.

Bertschek, I., U. Kaiser. 2004. Productivity Effects of Organizational Change: Microeconometric Evidence. Management Science 50(3) 394-404.

Bharadwaj, S. G., Bharadwaj, A. S., E. Bendoly. 2007. The Performance Effects of Complementarities Between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes. Information Systems Research 18(4) 437-453. Bharadwaj, A. S., S.G. Bharadwaj, B. R. Konsynski. 1999. Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q. Management Science 45(7) 1008-1024.

Black, S. E., L. M. Lynch. 2001. How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics 83 434-445.

Bocquet, R., O. Brossard, M. Sabatier. 2007. Complementarities in organizational design and the diffusion of information technologies: An empirical analysis. Research Policy 36 367–386.

Bresnahan, T. F., E. Brynjolfsson, L. M. Hitt. 2002. Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-level Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 339-376.

Broadbent, M., P. Weill, D. St. Claire. 1999. The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quarterly 23(2) 159–182.

Brynjolfsson, E. 1993. The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology: Review and Assessment. Communication of the ACM 36(12) 67-77.

Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt. 1995. Information Technology as a Factor of Production: The Role ofDifferences among Firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(3–4) 183–99.

Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt. 1996. Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending.Management Science 42(4) 541-558.

Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt. 2000. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4) 23-48.

Brynjolfsson, E. L. M. Hitt. 2003. Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence.Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4) 793–808.

Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt, S. Yang. 2002. Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1 137-198.

Brynjolfsson, E., T. W. Malone, V. Gurbaxani, A. Kambil. 1994. Does Information Technology Lead to Smaller Firms? Management Science 40(12) 1628-1644.

Brynjolfsson, E., H. Mendelson. 1993. Information systems and the organization of modern enterprise. Journal of Organizational Computing 3(3) 245-255.

Caroli, E., J. Van Reenen. 2001. Skill-based organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments.Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 1449-1492.

Carree, M., B. Lokshin, R. Belderbos. 2010. A note on testing for complementarity and substitutability in the case of multiple practices. Journal of productivity Analysis (forthcoming).

Chari, M. D. R., S. Devaraj, P. David. 2008. The Impact of Information Technology Investments and Diversification Strategies on Firm Performance. Management Science 54(1) 224-234.

Choi, B., S. K. Poon, J. G. Davis. 2008. Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementarity theory-based approach. Omega 36 235–251.

Colombo, M. G., M. Delmastro. 2002. The Determinants of Organizational Change and Structural Inertia: Technological and Organizational Factors. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 11(4) 595–635.

Dedrick, J., V. Gurbaxani, K. Kraemer. 2003. Information Technology and Economic Performance: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence. ACM Computing Surveys 35(1) 1–28.

Devanna, M. A., N. Tichy. 1990. Creating the Competitive Organization of the 21stCentury: The Boundaryless Corporation. Human Resource Management 29 455-471.

Devaraj, S., R. Kohli. 2003. Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? Management Science 49(3) 273-289.

Davenport, T. 1993. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Ennen, E., A. Richter. 2010. The whole is more than the sum of its parts or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. Journal of Management 36 207-233.

Fiedler, F. E. 1967. A theory of leadership effectiveness.McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Freeman, S. J., K. S. Cameron. 1993. Organizational downsizing: A convergence and reorientation framework. Organization Science 4(1) 10–29.

Faulkner, D. O. 1994. International strategic alliances: Co-operating to compete. McGraw-Hill, London, UK.

Froot, K. A. 1989. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24 333–355.

Fulk, J., G. DeSanctis. 1995. Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science 6 337–349.

Geroski, P. P. Gregg. 1994. Corporate restructuring in the UK during the recession. Business Strategy Review 5(2) 1–19.

Giuri, P., S. Torrisi, N. Zinovyeva. 2008. ICT, skills, and organizational change: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 17(1) 29-64.

Gouriéroux, C., A. Holly, A. Monfort. 1982. Likelihood ratio test, Wald test, and Kuhn-Tucker test in linear models with inequality constraints on the regression parameters. Econometrica 50(1) 63-80.

Greenan, N. 2003. Organizational change, technology, employment and skills: an empirical study of French manufacturing. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27(2) 287-316.

Gulati R., D. Lavie, H. Singh. 2009. The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management Journal 30(11) 1213-1233.

Hammer, M., J. Champy. 1993. Re-Engineering the Corporation. Nicholas Brealey, London, UK.

Handy, C. 1992.Balancing corporate power: A new Federalist Paper. Harvard Business Review 70(6) 59–72.

Hedlund, G. 1994. A model of knowledge management and the N-Form corporation. StrategicManagement Journal 15 73–90.

Hempell, T. 2005. What’s spurious, what’s real? Measuring the productivity impacts of ICT at the firm-level. Empirical Economics 30 427–464.

Hitt, L. M. 1999. Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Panel Data. Information Systems Research 10(2) 134-149.

Hitt, L. M., E. Brynjolfsson. 1997. Information technology and internal firm organization: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 81-101.

Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw, G. Prennushi. 1997. The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines. The American Economic Review 87(3) 291-313.

Jarvenpaa, S., B. Ives. 1994. The global network organization of the future: Information management opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(4) 25-58.

Jeffers, P. I., W. A. Muhanna, B. R. Nault. 2008. Information Technology and Process Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Interaction Between IT and Non-IT Resources. Decision Sciences 39(4) 703-735.

Kanter, R. M. 1991. Transcending Business Boundaries: 12,000 World Managers View Change. Harvard Business Review 69(3) 151­164.

Kast, F., J. Rosenzweig. 1973. Contingency Views of Organization and Management. Science Research Associates, Chicago, IL.

Kelley, M. R. 1994. Productivity and Information Technology: The Elusive Connection. Management Science 40(11) 1406-1425.

Kodde, D., F. Palm. 1986. Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica 54(5) 1243-1248.

Koellinger, P. 2008. The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance-Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe. Research Policy 37 1317-1328.

Lawler, E. D., S. A. Mohrman, E. Ledford Jr. 1998. Strategies for High Performance Organizations: Employee Involvement, TQM and Reengineering Programs in Fortune 1000 Corporations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Leonardi, P. M. 2007. Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change. Organization Science 18(5) 813–831.

Leonardi, P. M., D. E. Bailey. 2008. Transformational technologies and the creation of New Work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quarterly 32(2) 411-436.

Levinthal, D. A. 1997. Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes. Management Science 43(7) 934-950.

Malone, T. W., J. Yates, R. I. Benjamin. 1987. Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies. Communications of the ACM 30(6) 484–97.

Martinsons, M. G. 1995. Radical Process Innovation Using Information Technology: The Theory, the Practice and the Future of Reengineering. International Journal of Information Management 15(4) 253-269.

Melville, N., V. Gurbaxani, K. Kraemer. 2007. The productivity impact of information technology acrosscompetitive regimes: The role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decision Support Systems 43 229-242.

Melville, N., K. Kraemer, V. Gurbaxani. 2004. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly 28 283-322.

Merchant, H., D. Schendel. 2000. How do international joint ventures create shareholder value? Strategic Management Journal 21 723-737.

Miles, R. E., C. C. Snow, J. A. Mathews, H. J. Coleman. 1997. Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form. Academy of Management Executive 11(4) 7–20.

Milgrom, P., Y. Qian, J. Roberts. 1991. Complementarities, momentum and the evolution of modern manufacturing. American Economic Review 81 84-88.

Milgrom, P., J. Roberts. 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review 80 511-528.

Milgrom, P., J. Roberts. 1994. Complementarities and systems: Understanding Japanese economic organization. Estudios Economicos 9 3-42.

Milgrom, P., J. Roberts. 1995. Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19(2,3) 179-208.

Miller, D. 1987. The genesis of configuration.Academy of Management Review 12 686–701.

Miller, D. 1996. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal 17(7) 505–12.

Miller, D., P. H. Friesen. 1984. Organizations: A quantum view. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Mintzberg, H. 1979. The structuring of organizations.Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Mohnen, P., L.-H.Roller. 2005. Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review 49 1431–1450.

Montoya, M. M., A. P. Massey, Y.-T.C. Hung, C. B. Crisp. 2009. Can you hear me now? Communication in virtual product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(2) 139–155.

Nonaka, I., H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Osterman, J. 1994. How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it? Industrial &Labor Relations Reviews 47(2) 173–188.

Otley, D. T. 1980. The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5(4) 413-428.

Prahalad, C. K., G. Hamel. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68(3) 79–91.

Pickering, J. M., J. L. King. 1995. Hardwiring weak ties: Inter-organizational computer-mediated communication, occupational communities, and organizational change. Organization Science 6(4) 479-486.

Piva, M., E. Santarelli, M. Vivarelli. 2005. The skill bias effect of technological and organizational change: evidence and policy implications. Research Policy 34 141-157.

Polder, M., G. van Leeuwen, P. Mohnen, W. Raymond. 2010. Product, process and organizational innovation: drivers, complementarity, and productivity effects. UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2010-035.

Quinn, J. B., J. J. Baruch, P. C. Paquette. 1987. Technology in Services. Scientific American 257(6).

Radner, R. 1993. The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica 62 1109–1146.

Rivkin, J. W. 2000. Imitation of Complex Strategies.Management Science 46 824-844.

Roach, S.S. 1991. Services under siege. The restructuring imperative, Harvard Business Review 69(5) 82-92.

Sahaym, A., H. K. Steensma, M. A. Schilling. 2007. The Influence of Information Technology on the Use of Loosely Coupled Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis. Organization Science 18(5) 865-880.

Sambamurthy, V., A. Bharadwaj, V. Grover. 2003. Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly 27 237-263.

Sankaranarayanan, R., A. Sundararajan. 2010. Electronic Markets, Search Costs, and Firm Boundaries. Information systems Research 21(1) 154-169.

Shah, R., P. T. Ward. 2007. Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management 25(4) 785-805.

Siggelkow, N. 2002.Misperceiving Interactions among Complements and Substitutes: Organizational Consequences.Management Science 48(7) 900-916.

Sircar, S., J. Choi. 2009. A study of the impact of information technology on firm performance: a flexible production function approach. Information Systems Journal 19 313-339.

Sircar, S., J. L. Turnbow, B. Bondoloi. 2000. The impact of information technology investments on firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 69–97.

Statistics Canada. 2007. Depreciation Rates for the Productivity Accounts. Research Paper: The Canadian Productivity Review.

Train, K. 2003.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Triplett J. E. 1999. The Solow’s productivity paradox: what do computers do to productivity? Canadian Journal of Economics 32(2) 309-334.

White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 817–830.

White, R. E., J. N. Pearson, J. Wilson. 1999. JIT Manufacturing: A Survey of Implementations in Small and Large U.S. Manufacturers. Management Science 45(1) 1–15.

Whittington, R., A. Pettigrew, S. Peck, E. Fenton, M. Conyon. 1999. Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: a European Panel Study, 1992–1996. Organization Science 10 583–600.

Wolak, F. 1989. Testing inequality constraints in linear econometric models.Journal of Econometrics 41 205-235.

Zammuto, R. F., T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D. J. Dougherty, S. Faraj. 2007. Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization. Organization Science 18(5) 749-762.

Zack, M. H. 1999. Developing a knowledge strategy.California Management Review 41(3) 125–145.

Zand, F., C. van Beers. 2010. Enterprise Systems Adoption and Firm Performance in Europe: The Role of Innovation. DRUID Working Paper.

Zand, F., 2010. Information Technology and Firm Performance: The Role of Innovation. PhD Dissertation: Delft University of Technology, Department of Management and Economics of Innovation.

Zeffane, R. 1992. Organizational structures: Design in the 1990s. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 13(6) 18–23.

Zell, D. 1997. Changing by Design: Organizational Innovation at Hewlett-Packard.Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

Zenger, T. R., W. S. Hesterly. 1997. The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives and molecular units. Organization Science 8(3) 209–222.

Zornoza, C. C., R. L. Alcamí. 1999. The Enabling Role of Information Technologies on the Emergence of New Organizational Forms.Management (special issue: Organizational Downsizing) 2(3)251-261.

Zuboff, S. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books, New York, NY.