Random queues and risk averse users

De Palma, André and Fosgerau, Mogens (2013): Random queues and risk averse users. Published in: European Journal of Operational Research , Vol. 230, No. 2 (2013): pp. 313-320.

Abstract

We analyse Nash equilibrium in time of use of a congested facility. Users are risk averse with general concave utility. Queues are subject to varying degrees of random sorting, ranging from strict queue priority to a completely random queue. We define the key "no residual queue" property, which holds when there is no queue at the time the last user arrives at the queue, and prove that this property holds in equilibrium under all queueing regimes considered. The no residual queue property leads to simple results concerning the equilibrium utility of users and the timing of the queue.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Congestion; Queuing; Risk aversion; Endogenous arrivals
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D00 - General; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General

References

Arnott, R. A., de Palma, A. and Lindsey, R. (1993) A structural model of peak-period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand American Economic Review 83(1), 161-179.

Arnott, R. A., de Palma, A. and Lindsey, R. (1999) Information and time-of-usage decisions in the bottleneck model with stochastic capacity and demand European Economic Review 43(3), 525-548.

Arnott, R. J. (1979) Unpriced transport congestion Journal of Economic Theory 21(2), 294-316.

Barro, R. J. and Romer, P. M. (1987) Ski-Lift Pricing, with Applications to Labor and Other Markets American Economic Review 77(5), 875-890.

Becker, G. S. (1991) A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influences on Price Journal of Political Economy 99(5), 1109-1116.

Blanc, J. P. C. (2009) Bad luck when joining the shortest queue European Journal of Operational Research 195(1), 167-173.

Daniel, J. I. (1995) Congestion Pricing and Capacity of Large Hub Airports: A Bottleneck Model with Stochastic Queues Econometrica 63(2), 327-370.

de Palma, A. and Arnott, R. A. (1989) The temporal use of a telephone line Information Economics and Policy 4(2), 155-174.

Gross, D., Shortle, J. F., Thomson, J. M. and Harris, C. (2008) Fundamentals of Queueing Theory fourth edn John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ.

Hassin, R. (1985) On the Optimality of First Come Last Served Queues Econometrica 53(1), 201-202.

International Transport Forum (2007) The Extent of and Outlook for Congestion. Briefing Note.

Knudsen, N. C. (1972) Individual and Social Optimization in a Multiserver Queue with a General Cost-Benefit Structure Econometrica 40(3), 515-528.

Lancaster, T. (1990) The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data Econometric Society Monographs Cambridge University Press New York.

Naor, P. (1969) The regulation of queue size by levying tolls Econometrica 37(1), 15-24.

Newell, G. F. (1982) Applications of Queueing Theory 2nd. edn Chapman & Hall.

Small, K. (1982) The scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips American Economic Review 72(3), 467-479.

Small, K. A. and Verhoef, E. T. (2007) Urban transportation economics Routledge London and New York.

Texas Transportation Institute (2007) The 2007 Urban Mobility Report, September.

Vickrey, W. S. (1969) Congestion theory and transport investment American Economic Review 59(2), 251-261.

Yoshida, Y. (2008) Commuter arrivals and optimal service in mass transit: Does queuing behavior at transit stops matter? Regional Science and Urban Economics 38(3), 228-251.