How consumers’ socio-economic background influences satisfaction: Insights for better utility regulation

Clifton, Judith and Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel and Fernández-Gutiérrez, Marcos (2013): How consumers’ socio-economic background influences satisfaction: Insights for better utility regulation.

Abstract

Augmenting consumer welfare was a key justification behind the reform of utilities from the 1980s. But, three decades later, evidence is mounting that consumer satisfaction with household utilities is quite uneven. Moreover, governments, regulators and international organizations are increasingly recognizing that consumers from specific socio-economic backgrounds may be less satisfied than those from other backgrounds. To attend to this, instances of demand-side regulation have been implemented, but there remains a lack of empirical research on the precise links between consumers’ socio-economic background and their satisfaction. This article contrasts consumers’ stated and revealed preferences for three major household utility services (electricity, gas and telecommunications, including internet) across twelve European countries. Contrasting stated and revealed preferences has been applied to policy on transportation, marketing and the environment: this article pioneers the application of this technique to the analysis of satisfaction with household utilities across multiple countries. We find strong evidence that consumers’ socio-economic category matters: consumers with lower levels of education, the elderly and those who are not employed exhibit particular expenditure patterns and lower satisfaction levels vis-à-vis some of or all the services under analysis. We conclude by highlighting how our findings may be of use to regulators in the ongoing quest to improve the quality of utility regulation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Utilities, regulation, satisfaction, socio-economic background, consumers, stated and revealed preferences.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D18 - Consumer Protection; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L97 - Utilities: General; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L98 - Government Policy

References

Andreasen A. R. and Manning, J. (1990) The dissatisfaction and complaining behavior of vulnerable consumers. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, 3, 12-20.

Armstrong, M. and Sappington, D. (2006) Regulation, competition and liberalization. Journal of Economic Literature, XLIV, 325–366.

Australian Government (2007) Behavioural Economics and Public Policy: Roundtable Proceedings. Australian Government, Productivity Commission: Melbourne. Last accessed 12 June 2012 at: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/79250/behavioural-economics.pdf

Briglauer, W., Schwarz, A. and Zulehner, C. (2011) Is fixed-mobile substitution strong enough to de-regulate fixed voice telephony? Evidence from the Austrian markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 39, 50-67.

Cardona, M., Schwarz, A., Yurtoglu, B.B. and Zulehner, C. (2009) Demand estimation and market definition for broadband Internet services. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 35, 70-95.

Clifton, J., Comín, F. and Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2005) Empowering Europe´s Citizens? On the prospects for the Charter of Services of General Interest. Public Management Review, 7 (3), 417-443.

Clifton, J. and Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2010) Evaluating EU policies on public services: a citizens’ perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81 (2), 281-311.

Clifton, J., P. Lanthier and H. Schroeter (2011) Regulation and Deregulation of Utilities in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Business History, 5 (3), 659-672.

Consumer Focus (2010) What´s the deal? http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/files/2010/10/Whats-the-deal-2010.pdf

Cooper, J. C. and Kovacic, W. E. (2012) Behavioral economics: implications for regulatory behavior. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 41 (1), 41-58.

Crew, M. and Kleindorfer, P. R. (2002) Regulatory Economics: Twenty Years of Progress? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21 (1), 5-22.

EC (1997) Eurobarometer 47.0: L´Europe des Consommateurs, Brussels: EC.

EC (2000) Eurobarometer 53.0: Les Européens et les services d´intérêt généraux, Brussels: EC.

EC (2002) Eurobarometer 58.0: Consumers´ opinions on Services of General Interest in the EU 15, Brussels: EC.

EC (2003) CCEB Eurobarometer: Consumers' opinions on services of general interest in the New Member States, Brussels: EC.

EC (2004) EU competition policy and the consumer, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

EC (2005) Eurobarometer 62.1: Consumers opinions on Services of General Interest, Brussels: EC.

EC (2007) Eurobarometer 65.3: Consumers opinions on Services of General Interest, Brussels: EC.

EC (2008) How Can Behavioral Economics Improve Policies Affecting Consumers? Details and Presentations from the international conference organized by DG Health and Consumer Protection: Brussels. Last accessed 15 June 2012 at: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/dyna/conference/economics_en.htm

EC (2010a) The Monitoring of Consumer Markets in the European Union http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/strategy/docs/EC_Market_Monitoring_2010_en.pdf

EC (2010b) Behavioral Economics, So What: Should Policy Makers Care? Material from the International Conference organized by DG Health and Consumers, Brussels, November 22. Last accessed on 22 June 2012 at: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/conferences/behavioural_economics2/links_en.htm

EC (2011) The Monitoring of Consumer Markets in the European Union http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/strategy/docs/EC_Market_Monitoring_2011_en.pdf

European Parliament (2012) On a strategy for strengthening the rights of vulnerable consumers. (2011/2272(INI)). European Parliament: Brussels.

EUROSTAT (2011) Household Budget Survey, Luxembourg: EUROSTAT.

Faruqui, A. and Sergici, S. (2011) Dynamic pricing of electricity in the mid-Atlantic region: econometric results from the Baltimore gas and electric company experiment. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 40, 82-109.

Federal Trade Commission (2007) Behavioral Economics and Consumer Policy, New Jersey, September 14. Conference materials last accessed 22 June 2012 at: http://www.ftc.gov/be/consumerbehavior/index.shtml

Frey, B. S. And Stutzer (2002) What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research. Journal of Economic Literature, XL, 402-435.

Giulietti, M. Waddams Price, C. and Waterson, M. (2005) Consumer Choice and competition Policy: a study of UK Energy Markets. The Economic Journal, 115, 949-968.

Glass, V. and Stevanova, S.K. (2010) An empirical study of broadband diffusion in rural America. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 38, 70-85.

Gómez-Lobo, A. (1996) The Welfare Consequences of Tariff Rebalancing in the Domestic Gas Market. Fiscal Studies, 17 (4), 49-65.

Hancock, R. and Waddams Price, C. (1996) Competition in the British Domestic Gas Market: Efficiency and Equity. Fiscal Studies, 16 (3), 81-105.

Haynes, G. A. (2009) Testing the Boundaries of the Choice Overload Phenomenon: The Effect of Number of Options and Time Pressure on Decision Difficulty and Satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 26 (3), 204-212.

HMSO (2000) Utilities Act, last accessed 16 June 2012 at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/27/pdfs/ukpga_20000027_en.pdf

Institute for Government (2010) Mindspace. Influencing behaviour through public policy, London: Institute for Government, Cabinet Office.

Iyengar, S. S. and Lepper, M. R. (2000) When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79 (6), 995-1006.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R. H. (2006) Anomalies. Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (1), 221-234.

Kaserman, D. L. and Mayo, J. W. (1994) Cross-subsidies in Telecommunications: Roadblocks on the Road to More Intelligent Telephone Pricing, Yale Journal on Regulation, 119-146.

Mullainathan, S. and Thaler, R. (2000) Behavioural economics. Working Paper Series, 00-27. Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

OECD (2008) Enhancing Competition in Telecommunications: Protecting and Empowering Consumers. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2009) Privatisation in the 21st Century: Recent Experiences of OECD Countries Report on Good Practices. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2010) Consumer Policy Toolkit. Paris: OECD.

OFGEM (2005) OFGEM´s response to the super-complaint on billing processes made by the gas and electricity consumer council (Energywatch) http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Markets/RetMkts/Compet/Documents1/11070-16305.pdf

OFGEM (2012) Proposals for a new Consumer Vulnerability Strategy, OFGEM: London, Last accessed 20 February 2013 at: http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Sustainability/SocAction/Documents1/Proposals%20for%20a%20new%20Consumer%20Vulnerability%20Strategy.pdf

OFCOM (2009) Consumer Bulletin, http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/consumer-bulletins/consumer_oct09.pdf

Office of Fair Trading (1998) Vulnerable Consumer Groups: quantification and analysis. http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_protection/oft219.pdf

Samuelson, P. A. (1938) A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour. Economica, 5 (17), 61-71.

Stern, J., (2012) Tackling Consumer Vulnerability, Consumer Focus, http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/files/2012/12/Tackling-consumer-vulnerability.pdf

Whitehead, J. C., Pattanayak, S. K., Van Houvten G. L. and Gelso B. R. (2008) Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the service. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), 872–908.

Wilson, C. M. and Waddams Price, C. (2010) Do Consumers Switch to the Best Supplier? Oxford Economic Papers, 62, 647-668.