Kolesnik, Georgiy and Leonova, Natalia (2011): Исследование равновесий налоговой конкуренции в условиях монополистической конкуренции налогоплательщиков. Published in: Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Прикладная математика No. 34 (2011): pp. 111-125.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_47314.pdf Download (639kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The effect of taxpyers' competition at jurisdictions' local markets on the properties of the tax competition equilibrium is studied. The general equilibrium model is considered with mobile firms acting under monopolistic competition on local markets. It is shown that equilibrium tax rate tends to grow when the conditions of the firms' functioning are worsening because of any reason. The peculiar effect is multiple equilibria appearance if the profit of the firms is not monotonic function of their quantity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Исследование равновесий налоговой конкуренции в условиях монополистической конкуренции налогоплательщиков |
English Title: | Tax competition equilibria analysis under taxpayers' monopolistic competition |
Language: | Russian |
Keywords: | taxation, tax competition, race to the bottom, multi-level competition, hierarchical system, extensive form game, subgame-perfect equilibrium |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 47314 |
Depositing User: | Georgiy Kolesnik |
Date Deposited: | 31 May 2013 23:47 |
Last Modified: | 11 Oct 2019 01:22 |
References: | 1. Ferrett, B., Wooton, I. Competing for a duopoly: international trade and tax competition // Canadian Journal of Economics. – 2010. – Vol. 43. – No 3. – P. 776-794. 2. Janeba, E. Tax Competition in Imperfectly Competitive Markets // Journal of International Economics. – 1998. – Vol. 44. – No 1. – P. 135-153. 3. Baldwin, R., Krugman, P. Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonization // European Economic Review. – 2004. – Vol. 48. – P. 1-23. 4. Davies, R.B., Eckel, C. Tax Competition for Heterogeneous Firms with Endogenous Entry // American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. – 2010. – Vol. 2. – No 1. – P. 77-102. 5. Dixit, A.K., Stiglitz, J.E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity // American Economic Review. – 1977. – Vol. 67. – P. 297–308. 6. Friedman, J. Oligopoly theory // In: K.J. Arrow, M. Intriligator (Eds), Handbook of Mathematical Economics. Vol. 2. – Elsevier, 1993. – P. 491–534. 7. Wilson, J.D. A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition // Journal of Urban Economics. – 1986. – Vol. 19. – P. 296–315. 8. Zodrow, G., Mieszkowski, P. Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods // Journal of Urban Economics. – 1986. – Vol.19. – P. 356-370. 9. Колесник Г.В. Моделирование вертикальных эффектов конкуренции в иерархических системах // Труды 6 Московской международной конференции по исследованию операций ORM-2010. – М.: МАКС Пресс, 2010. – С. 418–420. 10. Колесник Г.В., Леонова Н.А. Модель налоговой конкуренции в условиях локальной конкуренции налогоплательщиков // Математическая теория игр и ее приложения. - 2011. - Т. 3. - No 1. - С. 60-80. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47314 |