Estimating the value of additional wind and transmission capacity in the rocky mountain west

Godby, Robert and Torell, Greg and Coupal, Roger (2013): Estimating the value of additional wind and transmission capacity in the rocky mountain west. Forthcoming in: Resource and Energy Economics

Abstract

The expansion of wind-generation in the United States poses significant challenges to policy-makers, particularly because wind’s intermittency and unpredictability can exacerbate problems of congestion on a transmission constrained grid. Understanding these issues is necessary if optimal development of wind energy and transmission is to occur. This paper applies a model that integrates the special concerns of electricity generation to empirically consider the challenges of developing wind resources in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States. Given the lack the high frequency data needed to address the special problems of intermittency and congestion, our solution is to create a dispatch model of the region and to use simulations to generate the necessary data, then use this data to understand the development patterns that have occurred as wind resources have been developed.

Our results indicate that the price effects caused by changes in power output at intermittent sources are strongly dependent on supply conditions and the presence of market distortions caused by transmission constraints. Peculiarities inherent in electric grid operation can cause system responses that are not always intuitive. The distribution of the rents accruing to wind generation, particularly in unexpectedly windy periods are strongly dependent on the allocation of transmission rights when congestion occurs, which impacts potential returns to developing wind resources. Incidents of congestion depend on the pace of development of wind and transmission capacity. Not accounting for such distortions may cause new development to worsen market outcomes if mistaken estimates of benefits or costs lead to sub-optimal development of wind and transmission facilities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: transmission, wind integration, wind energy, renewable energy, electricity grid, transmission value, dispatch model
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q40 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q49 - Other

References

Beck Inc., R.W. (2009), “Renewable Energy Development Infrastructure (REDI) Project: Regulatory and Economic Analysis”, Prepared for Colorado Governor’s Energy Office, September 21, 2009.

Department of Energy (2009), National Electric Transmission Congestion Study, US Department of Energy, December 2009. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2011), “Program on Technology Innovation: Integrated Generation Technology Options,” 1022782 Technical Update, June 2011

Green, R., 2007. “Nodal Pricing of electricity: how much does it cost to get it wrong?” Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 31, pp. 125-149.

Green, R. and Vasilakos, N., 2010. "Market behaviour with large amounts of intermittent generation,"Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3211-3220, July

Navigant (2010), “2010 Colorado Utilities Report,” Colorado Governor’s Energy Office.

NERC – North American Electric Reliability Corporation, (2008) “2008 Summer Reliability Assessment,” http://www.nerc.com/files/summer2008.pdf.

NREL – National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (2010) “Western Wind and Solar Integration Study,” http://www.nrel.gov/wind/systemsintegration/pdfs/2010/wwsis_final_report.pdf

Pratson,L., Haerer, D., and Patiño-Echeverri, D. (2013), “Fuel Prices, Emission Standards, and Generation Costs for Coal vs. Natural Gas Power Plants,” Environmental Science and Technology, forthcoming.

Stoft, S. (2002), Power System Economics, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.

Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) (2011), “10-Year Regional Transmission Plan, WECC Path Reports,” September 2011.

Beck Inc., R.W. (2010), “Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Electricity Generation Plants, November 2010,” U. S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Analysis U.S. Department of Energy, November 2010.

Beér, János (2006), “High Efficiency Electric Power Generation; the Environmental Role,” manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Brooks, Frank J. (2000), “GE Gas Turbine Performance Characteristics,” GE Power Systems Schenectady, NY.

California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) (2007), “GHG Modeling Assumptions: New Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) Generation Resource, Cost, and Performance Assumptions,” manuscript, CCGT ver 4. 11/7/07

Hassler, D. (2009), “Coal-Fired Power Plant Heat Rate Reductions,“ SL-009597 Final Report January 22, 2009, Sargent & Lundy LLC., Chicago

Kaplan, S. (2008), “Power Plants: Characteristics and Costs,” Congressional Research Service, Energy and Environmental Policy Resources, Science, November 13, 2008, Order Code RL34746.

Klein, J., and Rednam, A., (2007), “Comparative Costs of California Central Station electricity Generation Technologies,” California Energy Commission, Final Staff Report, December.

Nichols, C, Vaux, G., Zaremsky, C., Murphy, J. and Ramezan, M. (2008), “Reducing CO2 Emissions by Improving the Efficiency of the Existing Coal-fired Power Plant Fleet,” July 23rd 2008, DOE/NETL-2008/1329, National Energy Technology Laboratory.

Northwest Power Planning Council (NWPP) (2002), “New Resource Characterization for the Fifth Power Plan: Natural Gas Combined-cycle Gas Turbine Power Plants,” August 8, 2002

Nyberg, M. (2011), “Thermal Efficiency of Gas-fired Generation in California,” Staff paper, Economic Analysis Office, Electricity Supply Analysis Division, California Energy Commission.

Ragland, A. and Stenzel, W. (2000), “Combined cycle Heat Recovery Optimization,” Proceedings of 2000 International Joint Power Generation Conference Miami Beach, Florida, July 23-26, 2000.

Ramsey/Washington Counties Resource Recovery Project (RWCRRP) (2001), “Comparison of Potential Electricity Production from RDF and LFG,” Ramsey/Washington Counties Resource Recovery Project, Scope ID: 01R006.

Simon, Sarah J., Singleton, Amanda R. and Carter, John F., (2007), “Landfill Gas as Fuel for Combined Heat and Power,” Vol. 22, No. 4 2007, Cogeneration and Distributed Generation Journal, pp. 33-44.l

Wärtsilä Corp., (2005), “Engine technology 16 and 20V34SG,” Wärtsilä Commercial Document.