Yefimov, Vladimir (2009): Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_48173.pdf Download (743kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper tries to explain the extraordinary expansion in the 20th century of the English-born neoclassical economics and at the same time the decline of the German historical tradition. Methodology used in this paper is evolutionary institutionalist, which can be called, following American political scientists, Historical Institutionalism. The link between science and university was created first in Germany at the beginning of the 19th century with the reform of Wilhelm Humboldt. At the end of the 19th century when the institutionalization of economics took place, curriculum of English and most of the American universities were dominated by classics and theology. This was the determinant factor of institutionalization of economics as abstract science with its a priori method. On the contrary, German economics was institutionalized in new research universities in which experimental approach was highly valued. The continuation and very successful development in the United States of the scientific economic tradition born in Germany in the form of the Wisconsin Institutionalism was due to the economic support of its research by the big business interested at that time to find solutions to the “labour problem”. The paper also contains the description of institutional mechanism of stability and expansion of neoclassical economics. For a century and a half, economics claims to be a science having as model natural sciences. It used in this claim a modernist-type of discourse. Bruno Latour and other specialists of Science Studies have shown that this type of discourse never corresponded to the realities of scientific research: “We have never been modern”. The paper shows what kind of lessons the economists should learn from science studies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics |
English Title: | Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | institution of economics, German and English approaches to economics, institutional mechanism of stability and expansion of neoclassical economics, Bruno Latour’s model of scientific research, interpretive/pragmatic paradigm. |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B13 - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Stockholm School) B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B15 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 48173 |
Depositing User: | Dr Vladimir Yefimov |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2013 07:59 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 18:34 |
References: | Amable B. et S. Palombarini. L’économie politique n’est pas une science morale. Paris: Raison d’Agir. 2005. Balabkins N. W. Not by Theory Alone . . . : The Economics of Gustav von Schmoller and Its Legacy to America. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. 1988. Bateman B.W. “Clearing the Ground: The Demise of the Social Gospel Movement and the Rise of Neoclassicism in American Economics” in (Morgan and Rutherford, 1998). pp. 29 –52. Beauchamp Ph. Analysis of the Influence of Natural Religion on the Temporal Happiness of Mankind. London: R. Carlile. 1822. Berger P. and T. Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality, London: Penguin Books. 1991. Blaug M. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985. Blaug M. Great Economists before Keynes. London: Whitesheaf Books Ltd. 1986. Blumer H Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 1969. Boyle R. The Christian Virtuoso showing that by being addicted to experimental philosophy, a man is rather assisted, than indisposed, to be a good Christian. London: T. H. R. B. 1690. Brennan G. and J. Buchanan The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Liberty Fund Inc.,U.S. 2000. Bryant A. and K. Charmaz. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2007. Burtt E.A. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science. NY : Dover Publications. 2003. Bush P.D. “The Methodology of Institutional Economics: A Pragmatic Instrumentalist Perspective”, in (Tool, 1993), pp. 59 – 118. Caillé A. « Présentation ». Revue du MAUSS, No 30, 2007. pp. 5 – 28. Charle Ch. et J. Verger. Histoire des universités. Paris: PUF. 2007. Carlson M.J. “Mirowski's Thesis and the "Integrability Problem" in Neoclassical Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 31, 1997. Chavance B. Institutional Economics. New York : Routledge. 2008. Coats A.W. The Sociology and Professionalization of Economics. British and American economic essays. Volume II. London and New York: Routledge. 1993. Colander D. and A. Klamer The Making of an Economist. Boulder, Colorado : Westview. 1990. Collander D. The Making of an Economist, Redux. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 2007. Comte A. Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Part 1. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing, LLC. 2003. Commons J.R. Legal Foundations of Capitalism (1924), reprinted New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1995. Commons J.R. Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy (1934a), reprinted New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1990. Commons J.R. “The problem of correlating law, economics and ethics”, in Recueil d’études sur les sources du droit en l’honneur de François Gény, Tome III, Paris : Recueil Sirey, (1934b), pp. 124-144. Commons J.R. Myself. The Autobiography of John R. Commons (1934c), reprinted Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1964. Commons J.R. Social Reform and the Church. NY: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1967. Cunningham W. “Why had Roscher so little influence in England ?”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. November, 1894. pp. 317 – 334. Cunningham W. The Gospel of Work: Four lectures on Christian Ethics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 1902. Cunningham W. The Moral Witness of the Church on the Investment of Money and the Use of Wealth. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 1909. Davis D.B., D.W. Hands and U. Maki (Eds.). The Handbook of Economic Methodology, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. 1998. Davis D.D. and C.A. Holt. Experimental Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 1993. Degnbol-Martinussen J. Policies, Institutions and Industrial Development. Coping with Liberalisation and International Competition in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications. 2001. Denzin N.F. and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2005. Dey I. Grounding Grounded Theory. Guidelines for Qualitative Research, London: Academic Press. 1999. Edelman G. M. Second Nature. Brain Science and Human Knowledge. New Haven and London : Yale University Press. 2006. Ely R.T. The Past and the Present of Political Economy. Baltimore: N. Murray. 1884. (reprinted by Adamant Media Corporation in 2005). Ely R.T. Social Aspects of Christianity, and other Essays. NY: Thomas Y. Crowell & Company Publishers. 1889. Ely R.T. Ground under our Feet. NY: Macmillan. 1938. Engels F. The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844. New York: Cosimo Inc. 2009. Feyerabend P. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso. 1978. Fichte J.G. The Vocation of the Scholar. London: John Chapman. 1851. Fourcade M. Economists and Societies. Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 2009. Foss N.J. and G. Garzarelli. “Institutions as knowledge capital: Ludwig M. Lachmann’s interpretative institutionalism”. Cambridge Journal of Economics. May 2007. Friedman M. “Methodology of Positive Economics”, in Milton Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953. pp. 3 - 43. Furner M.O. Advocacy & Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science 1865-1905. Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. 1975. Furubotn E.G. and R. Richter Institutions and Economic Theory. The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 1998. Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. 1973. Gillespie M.A. The Theological Origins of Modernity. Chicago : Chicago University Press. 2008. Glaser B.G. and A.L. Straus. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategy for Qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. 1967. Goodwin C.D. “The Patrons of Economics in a Time of Transformation” in (Morgan and Rutherford, 1998). pp. 53 – 81. Greenwood D.J. and M. Levin. Introduction to Action Research. Social Research for Social Change, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 1998. Gribbin J., Science. A History. 1543 – 2001. London : Penguin Books. 2003. Grimmer-Solem E. The Rise of Historical Economics and Social Reform in Germany 1864 – 1894. Oxford : Clarendon Press. 2003. Hall P.A. and R.C.R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three Institutionalisms”. Political Studies. Vol. 44, N° 5, 1996. pp. 936 – 957. HamiltonW.H. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (Mar., 1919), pp. 309-318. Harter L.G. John R. Commons: His Assault on Laissez-Faire. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press. 1962. Heilbroner R. Behind the Veil of Economics: Essays in the Worldly Philosophy. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Co.,1988. Heilbroner R. and W. Milberg. The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1995. Heilbroner R. “Economics as Universal Science”. Social Research, Vol. 71, N° 3, 2004. pp. 615 – 632. Heisenberg W. Der Teil und das Ganze: Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphysik. Münich: Piper. 2006. Hodgson, G.M. Economics and Institutions, Cambridge: Polity Press. 1988. Hodgson, G.M., W.J. Samuels and M. R. Tool (Eds.). The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, in two volumes, Aldershot: Edward Elgar. 1994. Hodgson, G.M. “John R. Commons and the Foundations of Institutional Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXVII, N° 3, September, 2003. pp. 547-576. Humboldt, W. Gesammelte Schriften: Ausgabe Der Preussischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften. Bd. I—XVII, Berlin. 1903–36. Keynes J.M. Essays in Biography. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1963 Keynes J.M. General theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: MacMillan & Co., Ltd., 1936. Knorr Cetina K. “Epistemic Cultures: Forms of Reason in Science”, History of Political Economy, No 1, v. 23, 1991, p. 105 – 122. Knorr Cetina K. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Mussachusetts: Harvard University Press. 1999. Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1970. Lampman R.J. (Ed.) Economists at Wisconsin. Madison, Wisconsin: The Board of regents of the University of Wisconsin system. 1993. Latour B. and S. Woolgar. Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Losangeles, London: Sage. 1979. Latour B. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris : La Découverte. 1997. Latour B. “When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences”. British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 51, N° 1. pp. 107-123. 2000. Latour B. et V.A. Lépinay. L’économie, science des intérêts passionnés. Introduction à l’anthropologie économique de Gabriel Tarde. Paris : La Découverte. 2008. Lecours A. (Ed.). New Institutionalism. Theory and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2005. Levin M. and D. Greenwood. “Pragmatic Action Research and the Struggle to Transform University into Learning Communities”, in (Reason and Bradbury, 2001), pp. 103 – 113. Locke K. Grounded Theory in Management Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2001. Mazlish B. James and John Stuart Mill. London: Hutchinson. 1975. McCarthy Ch. The Wisconsin Idea. New York : Macmillan. 1912. Ménard C. (Ed.) Institutions, Contracts and Organizations. Perspectives from New Institutional Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2000. Ménard C. and M.M. Shirley (Eds.) Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Dordrecht: Springer. 2005. Menger C. Untersuchungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften und der politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Dunker u. Humblot. 1883. Merriam S.B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: John Wi1ey & Sons. 2001. Mill J.S. « On the definition and method of political economy » (1836). in D.M. Hausman (Ed.) The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1994. Mill J.S. System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive Being a Connected View of the the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (1843). London: Longmans. 1886. Mill J.S. Autobiography of John Stuart Mill (1873). Rockville, Maryland: Arc Manor. 2008. Mini P. “Cartesianism in Economics”, in (Hodgson, Samuels and Tool, 1994), pp. 38 - 42) Mirowski Ph. “The Philosophical Bases of Institutionalist Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXI, N° 3, September, 1987. pp. 1001 – 1038. Mirowski Ph. More Heat than Light. Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1989. Mittag G. (Leiter des Kollektivs) Politische Ökonomie des Sozialismus und ihre Anwendung in der DDR. Berlin: Dietz Verlag. 1969. Morgan M.S. and M. Rutherford (Eds.). From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham and London: Duke University Press. 1998. Mucchielli A. (Ed), Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales, Paris: Armand Colin. 1996. Nelson R.H. Economics as Religion. From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 2001. North D.C. “Understanding institutions”, 2000. in (Ménard, 2000), pp. 7 – 10. North D.C. The Role of Institutions in Economic Development, Occasional paper No.1, New York and Geneva: Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations. 2003. North D.C. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton and Oxford : Princeton University Press. 2005. Peirce C.S. “The Fixation of Belief”. 1877. In (Peirce, 1992, pp. 107 – 123). Peirce C.S. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear”. 1878. In (Peirce, 1992, pp. 124 – 141). Peirce C.S. “What Pragmatism Is”. 1905. In (Peirce, 1998, pp. 331 – 345). Peirce C.S. The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1992. Peirce C.S. The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 2, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1998. Peukert H. “The Schmoller Renaissance”, History of Political Economy, Vol. 33, N° 1, Spring 2001a, pp. 71-116. Peukert H. “Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller and Douglass C. North, Seen with Oldinstitutionalists’ Eyes”, European Journal of Law and Economics , Vol. 11, N° 2, 2001b, pp. 91-130. Prasch, R. E. “The Origins of the A Priori Method in Classical Political Economy: A Reinterpretation”. Journal of Economic Issues, N° 4 (December). Vol. 30, 1996, pp. 1105-1125. Priddat B. P. Die andere Ökonomie. Marburg: Metropolis.1995. Prigogine I. and I. Stengers. Order out of Chaos. Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. London: Flamingo. 1985. Rader B.G. The Academic Mind and Reform. The Influence of Richard T. Ely in American Life. University of Kentucky Press. 1966. Reason P. and H. Bradbury (Eds.). Handbook of Action Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2001. Raushenbush P.A. & E.B. Raushenbush. Our “U.C.” Story (1930 – 1967). Madison, Wisconsin. 1979. Rubinstein A. “Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist”. Econometrica, Vol. 74, No. 4 (July), 2006. pp. 865–883. Rutherford M. « Wisconsin Institutionalism : John R. Commons and his Students ». Labor History, 2006, 47 (May), p. 161 – 188. Samuelson P.A. and W.A. Barnett. Inside the Economist’s Mind. Conversations with Eminent Economists. Oxford: Blackwell. 2007. Schellschmidt H. Ökonomische Institutionenanalyse und Sozialpolitik. Marburg: Metropolis. 1997. Schlabach T.F. “An Aristocrat on Trial : The Case of Richard T. Ely “. The Wisconsin Magazine of History, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Winter), 1963 – 1964. pp. 149 – 159. Schleiermacher F. Hermeneutics and Criticism: And Other Writings Cambridge University Press. 1998. Schmoller G. « Zur Methodologie der Staats- und Sozial-Wissenschaften » in (Schmoller, 1998, S. 159 – 184) Schmoller G. Historisch-ethnische Nationalökonomie als Kulturwissenschaft. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag. 1998. Schumpeter J.A. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. 1954. Seckler D. Thorstein Veblen and the Institutionalists: A Study in the Social Philosophy of Economics. Boulder, Colorado: Colorado Associated University Press, 1975. Shapin S.and S. Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press. 1985 Shapin S. A Social History of Truth. Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 1994. Shapin S. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.1996. Skocpol T. States & Social revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, & China. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1979. Skocpol T. „Why I am a Historical Social Scientist”. Extensions: Journal of the Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center (Fall 1999) pp. 16-19. Steimo S., Thelen K. and F. Longstreth (Eds.) Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992. Strauss A. and J. Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 1998. Stringer E.T. Action Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 1999. Szenberg M. , Gottesman A. and L. Rarattan, Paul Samuelson. On being an Economist. New York: Jorge Pinto Books, Inc. 2005 Thomas W.I. and F. Znaniecki The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, 2 vols., New York: Knopf. 1926. Tool M. R. (Ed.). Institutional Economics: Theory, Method, Policy, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1993. Traweek Sh. Beamtimes and Lifetimes. The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 1988. Tribe K. Historical Schools of Economics: German and English. .Keele Economics Research Paper No 2, Keele University. 2002. Usunier J.-C., Easterby-Smith M. et R. Thore. Introduction à la recherche en gestion, Paris : Economica. 2000. Veblen T. The Place of Science in Modern Civilization. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. 1990. Ward B. “Institutions and Economic Analysis”, in Krupp R. The Structure of Economic Science, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1966, pp. 184 - 200. Witte E.E. The Government in Labor Disputes. New York and London: McGrow-Hill Company, Inc. 1932 Yefimov V. “On the Nature of Management Simulation Games”, Economicko-Matematicky Obzor (Review of Econometrics), vol. 15, N°.4, Prague: Academia, 1979, pp.403 -416. Yefimov V. “Gaming-simulation of the Functioning of Economic Systems”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 2, N° 2, 1981, pp.187 - 200. Yefimov V. Economie institutionnelle des transformations agraires en Russie. Paris: l’Harmattan. 2003. Yonay Y.P. The Struggle over the Soul of Economics. Institutional and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 1998. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/48173 |